Siz vaqtingizni "ijaraga berish" (pul evaziga sotish) orqali boy bo'la olmaysiz. Naval Ravikant
💯5⚡3

Channel
@milliyinvestor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
237subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003920922305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @milliyinvestor |
| Description | Maqsadimiz zakotga qodir boylarni ko’paytirish! |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 24 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/milliyinvestor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 15:22 | 237 | no change |
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:47 | 237 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 August 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,241 |
| Reactions total | 71 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
169 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 58 | 34.3% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 18.9% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 16.6% | |
| ⚡ | 18 | 10.7% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 8.28% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 4.73% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 3.55% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.592% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @milliyinvestor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 August 2026 to 5 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Siz vaqtingizni "ijaraga berish" (pul evaziga sotish) orqali boy bo'la olmaysiz. Naval Ravikant
💯5⚡3
Foyda ko‘rish qaror to‘g‘ri bo‘lganini isbotlamaydi Tanishingiz bir loyihadan yaxshi pul topdi. Endi sizga ham kirishni tavsiya qilyapti. Eng muhim savol «Qancha foyda oldingiz?» emas. «Bu natijaga qanday tavakkal bilan erishdingiz?» Yaxshi natija ortida puxta hisob ham, shunchaki omad ham bo‘lishi mumkin. Ularni ajratmasak, birovning muvaffaqiyatini takrorlayman deb, uning ko‘zga ko‘rinmagan xavfini ham o‘z zimmam…
💯2⚡1❤1👍1
Ushbu o'yinimiz deyarli tayyor bo'lib qoldi. O'yinning dastlabki versiyasini sinab ko'rish imkoniyatini 25 kishiga berib ko'rmoqchiman. Shu omadlilar orasida bo'lish uchun @sabaraliev ga murojat qiling.
👍3
🤫
🔥18🤔6👍3⚡1
Sizlar uchun katta sovg'a tayyorlayabman
🔥10😁2❤1
Boylik murakkab formuladan emas, to‘g‘ri odatlardan boshlanadi Charlie Mungerning fikricha, moliyaviy muvaffaqiyat uchun favqulodda aqlning o‘zi yetmaydi. Muhimi — fikrlashdagi xatolarni kamaytirish, o‘z imkoniyatingiz chegarasini bilish va uzoq vaqt davomida oqilona qarorlarni takrorlash. Asosiy tamoyillar: 1. Yaxshi biznesni tanlang. Arzon, ammo sifatsiz aktivni olishdan ko‘ra, vaqtinchalik muammoga duch kelgan …
❤2🔥1
Bir million so‘mlik qaror sizni ikki tomondan erkinlashtiradi Moliyaviy erkinlikda xarajatni kamaytirish oddiy tejashdan kuchliroq ishlaydi. Chunki u bir vaqtning o‘zida ikki natija beradi: bugun ko‘proq mablag‘ yig‘asiz va kelajakda sizga kamroq daromad kerak bo‘ladi. Oddiy misol. Oylik sof daromadingiz 10 mln so‘m, xarajatingiz 8 mln bo‘lsin. Har oy 2 mln so‘m ajratasiz. Endi hayot sifatini buzmaydigan xarajatlar…
❤4👍3🕊1
$1 000: naqd pulmi yoki oltinmi? 2016-yil sentabrida saqlangan $1 000 naqd pulning xarid qobiliyati 2026-yil avgustiga kelib taxminan $722 ga tushdi. Xuddi shu mablag‘ oltinda bo‘lganida, inflyatsiyadan keyingi qiymati qariyb $2 399 bo‘lardi. Ammo bu oltin doim o‘sadi degani emas. Grafikdagi 2018 va 2022-yil pasayishlari uning narxi ham o‘zgaruvchanligini ko‘rsatadi. Hisob jismoniy yoki to‘liq oltin bilan ta’minla…
⚡2👍1
Charchoq solig‘i: ayrim xarajatlarimiz aslida ishning narxi Ko‘pincha budjetimizga qarab, “Men shunchalik ko‘p narsaga muhtoj ekanman”, deb o‘ylaymiz. Ammo ayrim xarajatlar ehtiyojdan emas, charchoqdan tug‘iladi. Og‘ir ish kunidan keyin ovqat buyurtma qilamiz. Kayfiyatni ko‘tarish uchun keraksiz narsa sotib olamiz. Vaqt yetmagani uchun qimmatroq xizmat tanlaymiz. Dam olish kunida esa butun hafta yig‘ilgan bosimni x…
❤4👍4🔥2⚡1💋1
Pulning eng yaxshi vazifasi — uni kamroq o‘ylash Ko‘pchilik boylikni ko‘proq narsaga ega bo‘lish deb tushunadi. Ammo moliyaviy erkinlikning kuchi ko‘rinadigan buyumlarda emas. U sizning kuningizdan pul haqidagi xavotirni asta-sekin olib tashlashida. Qimmat telefon yoki avtomobil bir muddat quvonch beradi. Moliyaviy zaxira esa ishdan ayrilish qo‘rquvini kamaytiradi. Investitsiya portfeli darhol taassurot uyg‘otmasli…
🔥11👍3⚡1
5 yil kechikish qanchaga tushadi? Grafik Imanum platformasiga har oy $100 investitsiya qilish 45 yoshga kelib qanday farq yaratishini ko‘rsatadi. Hisobda yillik 20% nominal daromad oyma-oy taqsimlanib, olingan daromad shu oyning o‘zida qayta investitsiya qilinadi. 20 yoshda boshlagan investorning taxminiy balansi $848 529 ga yetadi. 25 yoshda boshlansa — $310 965, 30 yoshda — $111 570, 35 yoshda — $37 610, 40 yoshd…
⚡5❤4🔥3👍1
Bu kanal mening pul va boylik haqidagi fikrimni ..
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @milliyinvestor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Bu kanal mening pul va boylik haqidagi fikrimni ..
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 5 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Milliy Investor” (@milliyinvestor), 237 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milliyinvestor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.