Channel
@millakisss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003933437782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @millakisss |
| Description | чета пишу по бойнекстдор инфо: https://t.me/millakisss/3 анон: @anonmillakissbot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/millakisss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 52 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 52 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 51 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 933 |
| Reactions total | 155 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
155 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 27.1% | |
| custom 5276256839397309038 | 40 | 25.8% | |
| custom 5465405498306076070 | 20 | 12.9% | |
| custom 5273969086412394580 | 17 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5453871595560904326 | 16 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5319006409830965724 | 7 | 4.52% | |
| custom 5341564256674395858 | 7 | 4.52% | |
| custom 5458474597911375726 | 6 | 3.87% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#тред /\/\ happy birthday , 𝓶𝔂 𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓴𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻 🎸⋆⭒˚｡⋆ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ꒰ఎ(:̲̅:̲̅:̲̅[̲̅:♥:]̲̅:̲̅:̲̅:̲̅)໒꒱ 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐲, 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐦𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐚 𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 🪽in comments🦋
❤5custom 54584745979113757263custom 52739690864123945802custom 54538715955609043262custom 52762568393973090381
Sticker, posted without a caption
он играет на гитаре больше получаса😭😭😭 для нас 😭😭😭
❤2custom 52739690864123945802custom 52762568393973090382custom 53415642566743958581
Posted without readable text
custom 52739690864123945804custom 54538715955609043263custom 54584745979113757263custom 52762568393973090381custom 53415642566743958581
ура-ура! моя первая полноценная аушка!!! скоро выложу профайлы и 1 часть 🕷️ хехеххе за реакции и репосты буду очень благодарна 🥺🥺🥺
❤3custom 53415642566743958582custom 52739690864123945801custom 54538715955609043261
паук на минималках 🕷️ by @millakisss #snsau / nunsarangz (woonhak+leehan) о человеке-пауке, который может спасти половину города, но не может признаться в чувствах собственной мэри джейн 😩 унхак — человек-паук, который уже привык спасать город, но совершенно не готов к тому, что его лучший друг лихан однажды влюбится в человека под маской, даже не подозревая, кто под ней скрывается. пока унхак ревнует лихана буква…
❤4custom 52739690864123945804custom 52762568393973090384custom 54538715955609043264custom 53415642566743958583custom 54654054983060760703
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54654054983060760702
😭
❤4
в опросе энтузиазма было много, а вот реакций маловато… не переживайте, я уже пишу обещанное с бонедошками хехехехе
custom 54654054983060760705❤1
㋡ пов ㋡ wayf boys! ⠀ ты официантка и оставила свой номер симпатичному клиенту эндрю -> 🖤 джунмён -> 💛 андерсон -> 🩶 самуэль -> 🧡 райан -> 🤍
custom 52762568393973090385❤2custom 54538715955609043262custom 54654054983060760702custom 53190064098309657241
Posted without readable text
custom 52762568393973090384❤2custom 53190064098309657241custom 54538715955609043261custom 54654054983060760701
Posted without readable text
custom 52762568393973090383❤1custom 53190064098309657241custom 54654054983060760701
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @millakisss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
если я напишу какой-нибудь чатик с ними, вы будете не против?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 372,517 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mill a kiss | bnd” (@millakisss), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/millakisss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.