Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝑀𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑢𝑚𝑒 |полурест|𝒴𝒶.𝓁𝓎𝓊𝒷𝓁𝓎𝓊.𝓀𝒶𝓈𝒽𝓊❄️

@milikumee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

158subscribers

+63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002268189512
TypeChannel
Username@milikumee
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/milikumee

Growth

95158126.56 August 2026 — 95 subscribers9 August 2026 — 95 subscribers14 August 2026 — 158 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 86–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:38158+63
9 Aug 2026, 12:3295no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:1995first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
116.4%
avg views ÷ 158 subscribers
Avg views / post
184
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (1 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total3,127
Reactions total304
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

304 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘7625.0%
custom 54497452272061223316521.4%
custom 5370781918461720862309.87%
custom 5391041755938314631268.55%
custom 5246851234136078015206.58%
custom 5307784033948696965175.59%
custom 5368674137491401529175.59%
🍓165.26%
134.28%
custom 5391184963032865027103.29%
custom 526708584726976234872.30%
custom 539109433922290925472.30%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @milikumee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC62 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Низкя ребята вы че.. ого вас много

custom 54497452272061223314custom 53707819184617208621custom 53910417559383146311

8 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTC177 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пробую немного*другой стиль глазок

custom 544974522720612233116custom 53910417559383146318custom 53911849630328650277

7 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC239 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

13custom 54497452272061223317custom 53910417559383146314custom 53707819184617208621

7 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC162 views19 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю што показать!

💘12custom 53707819184617208625custom 53910417559383146312

6 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC176 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔤ommission Открыты!!!! Полный рендер🔤 🌟Хед ;;🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟Халф ;;🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟Полнорост ;; 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟Чиби ;; 🔤🔤🔤🔤 Скетч-Лайн 🔤 🌟Хед ;; 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟Халф ;; 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟Полнорост ;;🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟чиби ;;🔤🔤🔤🔤 Заливка цветом +30р Цена также может меняться и в частности зависит от сложности персонажа и идеи + 150-250р за нсфв версию Если вы заказываете по изначальной идеи нсфв, то доплата не нужна Фон 🔤 🌟Детальный ;; 150-300р 🌟Простой ;; — ‼️‼️ ПОМЕТКА

6 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC158 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот такая няшко вкусняшко🤩 Мне очень понравилось как вышло, если потренируюсь еще то может буду брать на таких чиби заказы😜

custom 544974522720612233110custom 52468512341360780158custom 53077840339486969656💘2

5 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC175 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я тренируюсь рисовать чиби

💘13custom 53077840339486969657custom 53910417559383146315

4 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC194 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Привет новенькие у меня тут кстати реквесты😜 Я кстати постараюсь всех отрисовать!!!🌟🌟

💘7

4 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC189 views27 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет это ужасно, мне приснился оч триггерный сон я проснулась в слезах до сих пор не могу успокоиться Ии эпл джек, заказик🌟🌟

💘12custom 53686741374914015298custom 52468512341360780155custom 53910417559383146312

3 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC201 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @korilelePhoto

Ставьте банан🍌 если хотели бы коммишку от меня😅👍

💘14🍓4custom 53911849630328650271

3 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC189 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сверху был ночной скетчик😜

custom 54497452272061223315custom 53707819184617208622custom 53911849630328650272

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @milikumee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 268,076 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑀𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑢𝑚𝑒 |полурест|𝒴𝒶.𝓁𝓎𝓊𝒷𝓁𝓎𝓊.𝓀𝒶𝓈𝒽𝓊❄️” (@milikumee), 158 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milikumee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.