Ну что, никто не хочет?

Channel
Трейды у milchi
@milchi_333
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
180subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003241203771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @milchi_333 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/milchi_333 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 180 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 184 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 185 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 185 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @milchi_333. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 May 2026 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Ктото хочет трейд? Я вам чтото в гаг2 а вы мне брейнрота, как минимум гараму
Или может и то и то?
Про что делать канал?
- Гров э Гарден 227%
- Оставить также но не сильно продвигать64%
- Ваше предложение в комментарии18%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
У кого есть кетупат брос дам 11 гарам
Результаты конкурса: Победитель: 1. Egoist (@Cava_bb) Проверить результаты
В или л? Он вместо ла секрета дал кэш ор кард
РОЗЫГРЫШ НА КЕТЧУРУ ИТОГИ НА 20 ЧЕЛОВЕК
На кого делать розыгрыш?
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
✦ ТРЕЙД ✦ ▸ Начо спайдер — 1.1 б/с ▸ Начо спайдер — 1.3 б/с ▸ Ла лаки гранде рейнбов — 2.1 б/с ▸ Ла романтик гранде рейнбов — 2.3 б/с ▸ Ла секрет дивайн — 1 б/с ▸ Ла лаки гранде — 1.2 б/с ▸ Ла лаки гранде — 1.4 б/с ▸ Ла лаки гранде — 1.2 б/с ◈ ПО ВОПРОСАМ ◈ → @Naotees ───── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ─────
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @milchi_333. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Про что делать канал?
- Гров э Гарден 227%
- Оставить также но не сильно продвигать64%
- Ваше предложение в комментарии18%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@milchi_333 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Трейды у milchi” (@milchi_333), 180 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milchi_333.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.