Channel
@mikroPast
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
649subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002007470692 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mikroPast |
| Description | Здесь информация о медицинском прошлом человечества от практикующего врача-эпидемиолога. По всем вопросам обращаться @sidelnikov2016 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mikroPast |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 649 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 649 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (15 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,816 |
| Reactions total | 111 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
119 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 90 | 75.6% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 5.04% | |
| 🤷♂ | 6 | 5.04% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 3.36% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 3.36% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 3.36% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 2.52% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 1.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mikroPast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ох, друзья... Форс-мажор у меня. Мой верный друг уже как 13 лет, который служил мне верой и правдой, был во многих моих интернет передрягах, который честно служил мне во имя презентаций и статей. Который пахал под ударами моих пальцев о клавиатуру, как невольник на хлопковых плантациях Южной Дакоты... Мой ноутбук перестал нормально подключаться к интернету. Посему постов будет немного, пока его пытаются привести в …
🙏4🤝3
Открытие Франкфурта Карлом Великим. Леопольд Боде, 1888 год. По легенде, Карл Великий с войском франком хотел перебраться через реку Майн. И помогла им в этом лань, которая нашла брод, и войско направилось за ней. Так появилось название Франкфурт - "брод франков". Но это всего лишь легенда... Да и пост не о том, а сегодняшняя СИНН прямиком из этого города, а если быть точнее то из местного аэропорта. ✈️В этом круп…
👍11
1. Известняковая статую фараона Джосера из его пирамиды. Фараон 3-й династии в эпоху Древнего царства. Умер где-то около 2611 года до н.э. 2. Статуэтка Имхотэпа - визирь и советник Джосера, верховный жрец бога Ра. В последствии бог медицины. Древние греки отождествляли его с Асклепием. 3. Стела голода - надпись на иероглифах, расположенная на острове Сихель в долине реки Нил. Итак, голод. Еще до известных всем всадн…
👍9🤝1
Историю какой неинфекционной болячки разберем?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Людвиг Карл Мартин Леонард Альбрехт Коссель (1853-1927) - немецкий биохимик, физиолог, пионер генетики. И это все лауреат нобелевской премии по медицине за 1910 год. в знак признания вклада в наши знания о клеточной химии, внесенного благодаря его работе с белками, включая нуклеиновые кислоты Вот благодаря этому немолодому человеку мы знаем про ДНК, РНК и их структуры, а также за биохимию клетки. 👉1877 - Коссель …
👍9
Сегодняшняя СИНН из Европейского региона. Доброе утро всем! 🏥Тамошний центр по профилактике и контролю заболеваемости заявил, что в некоторых европейских странах (Великобритания, Франция, Германия, Швеция) хорошо так растет число случаев заболевания гонореей... Но это бы ладно, все ж таки болячка является одной из самых распространенных среди всех инфекций, передающихся половым путем. Дело в том, что резко в рост …
👍5🤷♂5🤔2❤1
Порадуемся же за хоть какие-то хорошие новости...
Живые ослабленные вакцины защитили мышей от легочной чумы Рекомбинантные вакцины против чумы защищают не от всех природных штаммов Yersinia pestis — некоторые из них лишены капсульного антигена F1, который служит основным компонентом этих вакцин. Авторы статьи в Science Translational Medicine создали две живые ослабленные вакцины, модифицировав хорошо изученный изолят Y. pestis (он был выделен от пациента, умершего о…
👍7❤1
1. Раймонд Алоизиус Вондерлер (1897-1973) - следующий глава группы исследователей сифилиса в Таскиги. 2. Юджин Хериот Диббл-младший (1893-1968) - на момент исследований глава Мемориальной больницы имени Джона А. Эндрю в Таскиги. В разных источниках сообщают, что либо они оба были главными исследователями на равных правах, либо один был ассистентом другого. 👉1933 - главой научной работы в Таскиги назначен Вондерлер.…
👍5🤔4🤷♂1
1. Кларк Талиаферро - основатель исследовательской группы на базе отдела венерических болезней Службы общественного здравоохранения США. 2. Начальные этапы исследования, 30-е годы. 👉1932 - итак, вдохновившись исследованиями в Осло в Службе общественного здравоохранения задумались, почему бы не устроить нечто подобное у себя в стране?? Давайте посмотрим, что будет, если больному сифилисом человеку не давать никаких …
👍5🤯3
1. Цезарь Петер Мёллер Бёк (1845-1917) - норвежский дерматолог. 🇳🇴 2. Участники Таскигийского исследования по заражению сифилисом чернокожего населения округа Мейкон, штат Алабама, США. Сроки проведения - с 1932 по 1972. Это ж 40 лет получается. В общем, если вы думали, что в исследованиях на сифилис в Гватемале было достигнуто дно, то нет... Снизу постучали. ❓И если вот внимательно присмотреться к датам рождения д…
👍6🤬4
А ты сделал прививку от кори? 🌏 Сегодня корь выявляют практически в каждой стране нашего шарика. Есть уже страны, которых лишили звания свободных от кори. Сегодняшняя СИНН из трех разных точек планеты. Новость раз. 🇬🇧 В Великобритании с начала 2026 года выявлено 883 случая кори, из них 52 процента только в Лондоне. К слову за весь 2025 год было 959 случаев. В 2026 году есть и летальные случаи - 2 ребенка и 1 взросл…
👍14
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mikroPast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Историю какой неинфекционной болячки разберем?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,103,445 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProБолезнь” (@mikroPast), 649 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mikroPast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.