3 measurements spanning 23 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106–107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 06:37
106
-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:17
107
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:51
107
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 106 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
17 (19 May 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
27
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
40 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
28
70.0%
🔥
11
27.5%
custom 5337080053119336309
1
2.50%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот тебя занесло, Алия!
Сказал коллега, когда увидел проф визитку и счета на оплату членских взносов.
Август - месяц подведения итогов рабочего года и время, когда мой проект уходит в отпуск.
Начну с глобального.
❗️11 лет тружусь онлайн.
Периодами совмещаю офис и удалёнку.
❤️7 лет, как ремесленник) в области коучинга и психологии. И все это время только практика. Факт, которым очень даже горжусь.
Год прол…
Человек, захваченный своими детскими комплексами - это страшно и разрушительно.
Но выгодно для большой гос системы. Это хорошие, управляемые исполнители
Много фото, мало слов
У меня плохо работает (читаем не работает) телефон.
Быть без связи - опыт, который мне определенно нравится😁
Но ровно до того момента, когда надо связаться с близкими или вызвать такси.
Между тем, командировки по Московской области имеют место быть.
В понедельник случился Красногорск, РАНХиГС и соц координаторы с разными судьбами и опытом из регионов России.
В среду Сергиев Посад, Мещер…
- Я не могу сейчас рассматривать офис, потому что подведу новый коллектив.
Я в любой момент готова выехать туда... к нему.
Жёны пропавших без вести, когда есть много больше надежд, что жив...
С каждой такой историей мне всё сложнее и требуется больше времени на восстановление.
Но это моя работа, которую я выбираю ежедневно.
Не помню, где прочитала эти строчки, но кажется им самое место здесь:
Помочь - это не все…
Иногда наша депрессия – это единственный "аварийный выход" из нагромождения вынужденных обязанностей (часто будто бы взятых на себя добровольно) и образов, которые не совпадают с нашими личными потребностями или даже противоречат нашей внутренней сущности.
Симона Мацлиах-Ханох "Сказки обратимой смерти. Депрессия как целительная сила"
Сегодня, уже перед самым закрытием, в кабинет заходит коллега и спрашивает, кто здесь Алия?
Я подняла руку, не отрываясь от компьютера.
• Привела к вам Благодарность!
Поднимаю голову, вижу клиента с которым работаю вот уже 9ый месяц(символично) , в онлайн - формате. Работаю, как психолог.
У нас было всего несколько минут, но….
Такие встречи, безусловно, трепетные и напитаны ресурсом, чтобы оставаться в этой проф…
●В сентябре буду набирать супервизионную группу в полимодальном подходе.
●●Группа под гипервизией доктора психологических наук, профессора кафедры социальной и педагогической психологии.
●●●С возможностью подтверждения часов супервизии для вас, участники.
Это пока все, что могу озвучить, но есть ещё моменты, о которых я (очень надеюсь )смогу рассказать ближе к октябрю.
●●●●Группа будет закрытой.
Разные подходы и …
70% - 80% в терапии - это альянс
И это главный ингредиент в работе не только терапевтов, но всех, кто работает с людьми
В крупных организациях, между сотрудниками чаще всего выстраивается объектное взаимодействие без наличия контакта.
Тема очень горячая с учётом того, что только через контакт происходит влияние и изменения у тех, с кем работаем.
Коснулась темы в статье:
Феномен рабочего альянса в карьерном коу…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mikheevapsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧩Алия Михеева | Портфельное мышление” (@mikheevapsy), 106 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mikheevapsy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.