Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MIGHTY CHIMP PORTAL

@mightychimp

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

632subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001394797267
TypeChannel
Username@mightychimp
DescriptionThe next meta from the ape hype 0 tax Kyc and audit Nfts and utilities Aggressive marketing Presale Renounced and lp locked
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mightychimp

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Zayoncall/458625 Jun 2026, 19:03 UTC@mightychimp/766 · this entry5 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTC1.007 minutes
@mightychimp/767 · this entry12 Jun 2026, 15:14 UTC@Zayoncall/4586312 Jun 2026, 15:15 UTC1.0072 seconds
@Zayoncall/4586416 Jun 2026, 15:23 UTC@mightychimp/768 · this entry16 Jun 2026, 15:29 UTC1.006 minutes
@Zayoncall/4586517 Jun 2026, 18:37 UTC@mightychimp/769 · this entry17 Jun 2026, 18:45 UTC1.007 minutes
@Zayoncall/4586922 Jun 2026, 07:55 UTC@mightychimp/773 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 08:05 UTC1.0010 minutes
@Zayoncall/4587326 Jun 2026, 16:19 UTC@mightychimp/777 · this entry26 Jun 2026, 16:30 UTC1.0012 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Zayoncall16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutes@Zayoncall (142)
@freelutsandpresets16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 minutesthis entry (160)
@cooperacaovoy15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutes@cooperacaovoy (132)
@hANS171WIN15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutes@hANS171WIN (132)
@equipew15 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.009 minutes@equipew1 (32)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 43 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 June 2026 to 24 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @Zayoncall. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6327 Aug 2026, 10:01 — 632 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:17 — 632 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:017 Aug 2026, 10:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 631–633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 10:17632no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:01632first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.158%
avg views ÷ 632 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (2 June 202624 July 2026)
Views total3
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
447
Videos
115
Links
688

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

50$ to 50k$ SOL Challenge! ‼️ Started Tomorrow As promised, i will do another challenge for those who missed the previous one!💪 Last one we completed in 10 days, let’s do this one even quicker! 🐋 🫵🏽 Join my Privet channel now👇 👉🏻 https://t.me/+9PJAzgh_I3k3YjI0 🚨 https://t.me/+9PJAzgh_I3k3YjI0 40 Sol Giveaway live 🎁🎁 The link is limited to the first 100 members only⚠️

21 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨GET VIP SIGNALS FOR FREE🚨 We accept 30 more people without money ✅👇 https://t.me/+OG33ITLrWGRmYmIy We are giving VIP Trial free for those members who are in need. Join VIP Trial group 👇 https://t.me/+OG33ITLrWGRmYmIy

14 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇷France vs 🇪🇸Spain A match prediction from a former professional football commentator and analyst is live! Subscribe to the channel and don’t miss the updates 👉 HandiCap

13 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026

GROUP IS NOW FREE FOR THE NEXT 60 MINUTES 🐳 Join now and enjoy fast signals 🎯 Good analysis and news are shared https://t.me/+OG33ITLrWGRmYmIy The link is limited to the first 25 members only, friends⚠️ #promo

13 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026

▪️JOIN OR CRY LATER ▪️JOIN OR BE THE "I ALMOST BOUGHT" GUY ▪️JOIN OR TELL THE STORY OF HOW YOU FUMBLED IT https://t.me/RecchosHut #promo

9 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026

JOIN NOW OR CURSED 💸 JOIN NOW TO MAKE MONEY🐹 https://t.me/ElectrosHut #promo

2 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨GET VIP SIGNALS FOR FREE🚨 We accept 30 more people without money ✅👇 https://t.me/+OG33ITLrWGRmYmIy We are giving VIP Trial free for those members who are in need. Join VIP Trial group 👇 https://t.me/+OG33ITLrWGRmYmIy #promo

26 Jun 2026, 16:30 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

YOO Time to start the $50 → $100,000 challenge on Solana memecoins‼️ It’s ZERO-RISK, I’ll cover $50 for each participant Last time it took me about 8 days, will try doing it faster this time🫵🏽 If you want to follow along, just join our channel now before it closes. 👇👇👇 JOIN NOW 👇👇👇 🔴 https://t.me/+RmscbKAdq700ZDM0 🧲https://t.me/+RmscbKAdq700ZDM0 60 Sol Giveaway is live 🎁 #promo

24 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026

▪️Daily giveaway ▪️Free trannies ▪️+3 inches ▪️+$1m networth https://t.me/RecchosHut #promo

23 Jun 2026, 15:07 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$500 GIVEAWAY ➡️https://t.me/lunixplayhouse $500 GIVEAWAY ➡️https://t.me/lunixplayhouse $500 GIVEAWAY ➡️https://t.me/lunixplayhouse SIMPLE REQUIREMENT JUST BE IN THE TELEGRAM #promo

22 Jun 2026, 19:24 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026

JOIN OR GAY🏳️‍🌈 https://t.me/thevoidedsol JOIN OR TINY DICK🍆 https://t.me/thevoidedsol JOIN OR GET RUGGED😭 https://t.me/thevoidedsol #promo

22 Jun 2026, 08:05 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026

GROUP IS NOW FREE FOR THE NEXT 60 MINUTES 🐳 Join now and enjoy fast signals 🎯 Good analysis and news are shared https://t.me/+OG33ITLrWGRmYmIy The link is limited to the first 25 members only, friends⚠️ #promo

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mightychimp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 831,787 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MIGHTY CHIMP PORTAL” (@mightychimp), 632 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mightychimp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.