Channel
@miemie37
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004468764903 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miemie37 |
| Description | 私聊： @lalala1895频道: https://t.me/miemie37 机器人： @miemei189_bot |
| Created | 3 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miemie37 |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 23 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 3 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (3 September 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 597 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
报告模板 反馈报告 上课时间:9/29 验证留名：1 所在位置：大朗 老师名称: @lalala1895 上课价格：1000pp 妹子年龄：20 妹子容貌:10 妹子身材：9 服务态度：10 环境设备:10 自由评论：本人比照片漂亮系列，画了一层淡妆，灵动可爱，窈窕如玉，各种姿势都很配合，洗完澡后直接开始口，从女上开始，抱着真的好q弹，之后尝试了各种姿势后结束了，没有敷衍了事，服务满分，环境很好，期待二刷。 大朗松山湖 https://t.me/dgyyyzzz 市区 https://t.me/dgkkkzzz 长安常平 https://t.me/dgssslll 石龙寮步 https://t.me/dglllbbb 虎门厚街 https://t.me/dghhhmmm 园州 https://t.me/dgjjjzzz 会所 https://t.me/dghhhsss 黄江塘厦 https://t.me/dg…
我能说什么呢
报告模板 反馈报告 上课时间:9月29 验证留名:白菜 所在位置：大朗 老师名称：# 初恩 @lalala1895 上课价格：500 妹子年龄：不到20 妹子容貌:8 妹子身材：8.5 服务态度：10 环境设备：公寓 自由评论：最近被好多中介骗，货不对版，无聊刷到初恩妹妹，以为又要踩坑，抱着试试的心态，负责任的人人照基本一样 真人更亲近自然好看一些，很聊得来，服务过程彼此都很享受，看的出来，🐍饱了，下面流了很多水，几把毛都打湿了，500这个价格无敌，无敌，无敌、不敷衍了事、在大朗遇到服务态度最好的一个妞，给了200小费，也是第一次给小姐小费、喜欢服务态度好，而且嫩们的直接冲，我不是拖，是我的真实反馈，无敌存在，五星好评，五星好评…… 公开榜防失联 @tiantianfacai 公开榜 @vcaaa 同城群不开放版 @haha77 同城群开放版 @eee_4 纯狼友群 @DG66DS 麦当劳群 @DGQYXC 抽奖频道 https…
开课啦，好评来了，谢谢哥哥
初恩🉐日常 pinned a photo
Photo, posted without a caption
初恩🉐日常 pinned Deleted message
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @miemie37. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“初恩🉐日常” (@miemie37), 23 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miemie37.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.