Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for با تلگرام

Channel

با تلگرام

@midinternet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002179014153
TypeChannel
Username@midinternet
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/midinternet

Growth

404140.56 August 2026 — 40 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:4441+1
10 Aug 2026, 18:3240no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:2540first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
123.2%
avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.5
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,010
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26m 11s
Average length
3m 16s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC202 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

قابل توجه مسئولینی که خبر از مشکلات و درد و رنج مردم ندارند🤔😔 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈 📅 #یک‌شنبه #روز۱۸ #مرداد #سال۱۴۰۵

8 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC85 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

*در تمام عمرم هر چی پای منبرها رفتم گمون نکنم چنین سخنرانی را شنیده باشم ، که حرف اخرين پیامبر اسلام را با این صراحت بیان کند یا رسول الله توشاهد باش 📅 #شنبه #روز۱۷ #مرداد #سال۱۴۰۵

7 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

عظمت و قدرت خداوند را ببینید الله اکبر فقط یک عضو از اعضای بدن 📅 #جمعه #روز۱۶ #مرداد #سال۱۴۰۵

6 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC43 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔻بعد از چهار و نیم سال جنـگ؛ نرخ تورم در اوکراین تک رقمی است تورم روسیه با تداوم جنگ و تحریم، ۶ درصد است تورم افغانستان جنگ‌زده‌ی تحت سلطه طالبان، تک رقمی و ما بدون جنگ هم ۴ دهـه تورم چند رقمی و بی‌ارزشترین پول جهان را داشته‌ایم... برای ویرانی ما نیازی به جنگ و دشمن خارجی نیست! 📅 #پنج‌شنبه #روز۱۵ #مرداد #سال۱۴۰۵

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC20 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

هیچ حدیث یا روایتی یارای رقابت با Fact یا عقلانیت را ندارد. فقط Factها را خدا حجت قرار خواهد داد در روز جزا. Factهایی که امروز در مقابل چشمان ما هستند و هر کدام گواهی بر وجودش هستند و یگانگی و قدرت مطلقهٔ او. بر اساس آن حجتها ارزیابی خواهیم شد.

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC24 viewsread 10 August 2026

بله شنیدم که هر حدیثی را که خلاف عقل برآورد کردید بر دیوار بکوبید اساسا دین با عقلانیت و انسانیت منافات ندارد وگرنه در آن دین باید شک کرد البته متاسفانه خیلی از به ظاهر دینداران هستند که اعمال و رفتار و افکار و اعتقاداتشان با اساس دین منافات دارد

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC18 viewsread 10 August 2026

عباس جان و دوستان همراه درود در مورد نقش و اثر دین در تفکرات و تصمیمات بشر ، من نقش آن را بسیار موثر و قوی میدانم . همانطوری که در تصویر ارائه شده کشاورز بیسواد عفت همسر خود را برای کشیش فریبکار به حراج گذاشته است ، در میان ما ایرانیان هم بسیار دیده این از این تیپ ترجیحات ولی شاید به این شدت و حدت نباشد .

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC20 viewsread 10 August 2026

بسیار می‌بینیم افراد معتقدی که برای رفتن به سفر حج در حالی که زن و زندگی شان هیچ بهره ای از مال دنیا ندارند ولی مرجع روحانی عدد بزرگی برای آنها برای حلال شدن مال او و قبول مناسک حج از او میستاند . یا شخصی که ۵ دختر دارد و یکی را بنابر قاعده خمس به سید میدهد که احکام را در همه زمینه ها رعایت کرده باشد . یا سایر احکامی که یک سر آنها دریافت پول و مال اموال از مردم به نفع طبقه روحانی است .

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC20 viewsread 10 August 2026

دوستی همین خرداد سفری به واتیکان داشت و جالب بود که از درآمد هنگفت این امپراطوری مذهبی چه چیزها که نمی‌گفت. دقیقا همانند ترتیبات و مناسک حج که شما نهایتا قبل از سفر که یک روحانی اینجا از شما پول میستاند ، در مقصد هم که شما چه هزینه های بسیار انجام میدهی که همگی آقایون عافیت طلبی را سیراب و تطمیع میکند . ما مردم هم فکر میکنین واجبات دینی خود را انجام دادیم و خوشحالیم .

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC18 viewsread 10 August 2026

علیرضا جان درود بر تو ممنونم که توجه کردی و پاسخ دادی ضمن اینکه نظرم در مورد حرفهای تو اینه که: جانا سخن از زبان ما میگویی اما فکر میکنم بد نیست اضافه کنم که 👇

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026

برادر و خواهر اشتباه مرا به حساب مکتبم نگذار 👆 نمیدانم چرا اشتباه دینداران به اسم "دین" تمام میشود ولی اشتباه بی دینان به بدنامی "بی دینی" ختم نمیشود؟ 📅 #جمعه #روز۹ #مرداد #سال۱۴۰۵

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC18 viewsread 10 August 2026

یک نفر در پاسخ به سوال فوق نوشت """""""""""""""""""""""" چون دین داران مدعی هستند ولی بی دینان ادعایی ندارند

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @midinternet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 884,445 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“با تلگرام” (@midinternet), 41 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/midinternet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.