🔴چند روزه شایعه بود ایران اجازه بازدید از تاسیسات هستهایش رو داده ولی آژانس انرژی اتمی گفته از این خبرا نیست و از وضعیت هستهای ایران اطلاعی نداریم @micro_tradee
🤯598👎198🤬102💔32👍16❤15🔥14🎉11

Channel
@micro_tradee
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
1,013,529subscribers
+163,213 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001277282089 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @micro_tradee |
| Description | با مایکرو ترید هم از خبرها باخبر باش هم سرمایتو چندبرابر کن |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/micro_tradee |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @omidfadavi_com/1298410 Oct 2026, 07:44 UTC | @micro_tradee/7113 · this entry10 Oct 2026, 09:46 UTC | 0.98 | 2.0 hours |
| @omidfadavi_com/129495 Oct 2026, 08:25 UTC | @micro_tradee/7075 · this entry5 Oct 2026, 15:20 UTC | 0.98 | 6.9 hours |
| @omidfadavi_com/126555 Sept 2026, 07:07 UTC | @micro_tradee/6862 · this entry5 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC | 0.98 | 16 minutes |
| @omidfadavi_com/1251619 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC | @micro_tradee/6661 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC | 0.98 | 4.1 hours |
| @omidfadavi_com/1254822 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC | @micro_tradee/6692 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC | 0.97 | 2.2 hours |
| @omidfadavi_com/1298810 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC | @micro_tradee/7117 · this entry10 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC | 0.97 | 20 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @omidfadavi_com | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 2.2 hours | @omidfadavi_com (13–0) |
| @rastad | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 1.6 hours | @rastad (12–0) |
| @IrJaavan | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4 minutes | this entry (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 26 of the 26 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 405 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 12:08 | 1,013,529 | +15,858 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 23:04 | 997,671 | -5,240 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:17 | 1,002,911 | -3,890 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 1,006,801 | -3,737 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 1,010,538 | -3,833 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:21 | 1,014,371 | -2,902 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 1,017,273 | -3,433 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:39 | 1,020,706 | -3,650 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:28 | 1,024,356 | -4,061 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 1,028,417 | -4,222 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 1,032,639 | -4,553 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:45 | 1,037,192 | -4,087 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:45 | 1,041,279 | -4,641 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:31 | 1,045,920 | -5,298 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:19 | 1,051,218 | +25,813 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 1,025,405 | -4,661 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 1,030,066 | -6,057 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 1,036,123 | +9,778 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 1,026,345 | +493 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:39 | 1,025,852 | first reading |
748 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 199 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 748 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 5,174,600 |
| Reactions total | 206,263 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 13:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 90 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 124 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 96 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 1.6 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 36.2% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 89.4% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 21,500 views — 2.08% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 32,950).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /727930 Oct 2026, 20:27 UTC | 243 minutes – 74 minutes old | 12,900 views ~1,065 reactions | 60 minutes: 10,892 interp. | not yet at 24h | 43 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /727830 Oct 2026, 16:08 UTC | 737 minutes – 5.5 hours old | 20,600 views ~1,053 reactions | 60 minutes: 5,836 interp. → 3.0 hours: 14,100still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.0 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /727730 Oct 2026, 15:06 UTC | 99 minutes – 6.6 hours old | 21,700 views ~1,059 reactions | 60 minutes: 5,740 → 3.0 hours: 12,500 → 6.0 hours: 21,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /727630 Oct 2026, 10:46 UTC | 121.6 hours – 11 hours old | 24,200 views ~1,155 reactions | 3.0 hours: 16,700 → 6.0 hours: 21,900still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /726029 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC | 518 minutes – 2.5 hours old | 15,100 views ~1,036 reactions | 60 minutes: 7,528 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 60 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /725929 Oct 2026, 09:50 UTC | 729 minutes – 3.7 hours old | 18,100 views ~1,161 reactions | 60 minutes: 10,400 → 3.0 hours: 18,081 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 52 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /725829 Oct 2026, 09:44 UTC | 635 minutes – 3.8 hours old | 18,300 views ~929 reactions | 60 minutes: 11,703 interp. → 3.0 hours: 18,172 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 46 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /725729 Oct 2026, 09:34 UTC | 781 seconds – 3.9 hours old | 18,000 views ~869 reactions | 60 minutes: 11,314 interp. → 3.0 hours: 17,952 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 44 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
783,180 reactions across 748 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 234,841 | 30.0% | |
| ❤ | 167,422 | 21.4% | |
| 🤣 | 92,857 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 85,445 | 10.9% | |
| 🙏 | 34,696 | 4.43% | |
| 💔 | 31,534 | 4.03% | |
| ❤🔥 | 28,727 | 3.67% | |
| 🤯 | 28,142 | 3.59% | |
| 🎉 | 19,152 | 2.45% | |
| 🍌 | 18,455 | 2.36% | |
| 🤬 | 12,711 | 1.62% | |
| 👎 | 8,800 | 1.12% | |
| 👏 | 8,339 | 1.06% | |
| 😍 | 6,713 | 0.857% | |
| 💋 | 2,360 | 0.301% | |
| 🖕 | 2,058 | 0.263% | |
| 🤮 | 881 | 0.112% | |
| 🫡 | 41 | 0.005% | |
| 😘 | 6 | 0.001% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 748 of the 748 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 783,180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 748 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 207 posts held from the last 30 days (4.83%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴چند روزه شایعه بود ایران اجازه بازدید از تاسیسات هستهایش رو داده ولی آژانس انرژی اتمی گفته از این خبرا نیست و از وضعیت هستهای ایران اطلاعی نداریم @micro_tradee
🤯598👎198🤬102💔32👍16❤15🔥14🎉11
🔴 قیمت ارز TOP به 4.5$ رسید 🔴
🔥604🎉108❤55🤣24🙏18👍15🍌7👏4
🔥 نوش جونت
❤261🔥145🤣134🙏125👍62🎉34👎27👏26
🔥 نوش جونت
🔥598❤🔥195😍98❤50🤣24🙏20🎉19👍19
🔥 نوش جونت
❤259🤣131🔥129🙏125👍66🎉46🍌27❤🔥26
🔥 نوش جونت
🔥598❤🔥195😍98❤47🎉23🙏19👍16🍌7
🔥 نوش جونت
🔥600❤🔥196😍98❤51🤣22👍21🙏19🎉12
🔴دیروز روی ۲.۵ دلار گفتم TOP بخرید، فرصت هست؛ خیلیها نخریدن! 💥 الان قیمت رسیده به ۳.۸ دلار، هنوزم فرصت هست، ولی ممکنه فردا حسرت همین قیمت رو بخورید! 🎯 تارگت فعلی من همچنان ۱۰ دلاره. ➕ اونایی که هنوز وارد نشدن، فرصت رو جدی بگیرن. اونایی هم که خریدن، به نظرم حجم اضافه کنن 🟢 خرید فقط از ربات: @TopOnBnbBot
🔥601❤🔥196😍98❤55🤣23👍22🙏19🍌8
🔴 مراد ویسی: مجتبی خامنهای به احتمال زیاد زیر سفارت چین، زیر سفارت روسیه یا تو حرم امام رضا زیر قبر باباش باشه چون آمریکا این سه تا مکان رو نمیزنه. @micro_tradee
🤣802🍌238🔥117❤61👍48🙏23🎉14👏6
پیشنهاد ترامپ به چین: به جای نفت ایران نفت آمریکا را بخرید ارزون میدیم مشتری بشین:))) @micro_tradee
🤣673🔥218👍116❤62🙏22🎉20🍌6👏5
💖 نوش جونت
❤595🙏98🔥36👍29🤣28🎉22🍌7💔7
🔥 تبدیل ۴۵۰ میلیون تومان به ۱۵ میلیارد و ۷۰۰ میلیون تومان! ❤️ نوشجونت
🔥603🤯198❤110🤣32🙏27🎉25👍19🍌8
Showing the 12 most recent of 748 posts we hold for @micro_tradee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@micro_tradee edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مایکروترید” (@micro_tradee), 1,013,529 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/micro_tradee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.