Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

خرد انديشان متفکر

@micro_mindedDenker

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

369subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001089980670
TypeChannel
Username@micro_mindedDenker
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/micro_mindedDenker

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@micro_mindedDenker/4727 · this entry28 Feb 2019, 23:14 UTC@richard_davkings/425728 Feb 2019, 23:14 UTC1.00under a minute
@richard_davkings/425323 Feb 2019, 15:07 UTC@micro_mindedDenker/4732 · this entry5 Mar 2019, 09:33 UTC1.0010 days
@micro_mindedDenker/4733 · this entry8 Mar 2019, 08:48 UTC@richard_davkings/42628 Mar 2019, 08:48 UTC1.00under a minute
@micro_mindedDenker/4734 · this entry10 Mar 2019, 19:45 UTC@richard_davkings/426310 Mar 2019, 19:45 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@richard_davkings7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (43)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 15 February 2019 to 3 May 2019. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @richard_davkings. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3693733716 August 2026 — 373 subscribers6 August 2026 — 373 subscribers13 August 2026 — 369 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 368–374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:04369-4
6 Aug 2026, 20:33373no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:25373first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 February 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

2 Mar 2022, 16:54 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zeus_110Video

نژادپرستی در شبکه های غربی😏😏😏 https://t.me/zeus_110

28 Mar 2020, 23:26 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mortad_orgVideo

🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵 @mortad_org

21 May 2019, 08:49 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zeus_110Video

💎💎 #کلیپ جدید 304: «اتوفاژی و روزه اسلامی» #من_زئوس_هستم #زئوس لینک یوتیوب: https://youtu.be/3hRrsr9bi0M @zeus_110

14 May 2019, 12:24 UTC≈1,650 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zeus_110Video

💎💎 #کلیپ جدید 303: «زمین تخت گرایان» #من_زئوس_هستم #زئوس لینک یوتیوب: https://youtu.be/OsXrQt04mnQ @zeus_110

7 May 2019, 14:53 UTC≈1,580 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zeus_110Video

💎💎 #کلیپ جدید 302: «کارما» #من_زئوس_هستم #زئوس لینک یوتیوب: https://youtu.be/y_sEVutIHmQ @zeus_110

3 May 2019, 08:17 UTC590 viewsread 6 August 2026

گروه کتابخانه ممنوعه که فیلتر شده بود مجددا راه اندازی شد جووین بشید و لینک رو برای دوستانتون بفرستید 👇👇👇👇👇 📓Forbidden Library 📓 https://t.me/joinchat/C_v2Vz_rW0tjL0hfe5ygpA کتابخانه ممنوعه صوتی @forbidden_library با بیش از سی هزار جلد کتاب صوتی و پی دی اف

8 Apr 2019, 09:04 UTC772 viewsread 6 August 2026

گروه کتابخانه ممنوعه که فیلتر شده بود مجددا راه اندازی شد جووین بشید و لینک رو برای دوستانتون بفرستید 👇👇👇👇👇 📓Forbidden Library 📓 https://t.me/joinchat/C_v2Vz_rW0tjL0hfe5ygpA کتابخانه ممنوعه صوتی @forbidden_library با بیش از سی هزار جلد کتاب صوتی و پی دی اف

24 Mar 2019, 14:03 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mehbaang

از بردگی تا حاجی‌فیروز t.me/mehbangvideos/2 مهدی اخوان ثالث، با نشان دادنِ بیزاری از حاجی فیروز (در پاورقیِ خود در سروده‌ی ارغنون)، آن را «بقایای نفرت‌انگیز عهد توحش و برده‌داری» نامیده‌است. بعد از لغو برده‌داری، نظریه‌های زیادی در آمده که حاجی فیروز یک شخصیت زرتشتی است، و چون آتش برای زرتشتیان مقدس است و آنها در مراسمشان از آتش زیاد استفاده می‌کنند، دود صورتش را سیاه کرده و برای همین است که او سیاه است. این استدلال

14 Mar 2019, 22:28 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @MAADMAX365Video

🎞 مکالمه و گرامر از صفر تا پیشرفته 🎞 👈 آموزش کاملا تصویری (ویدیو با کیفیت عالی) 👈 آموزش کامل قالب های مکالمه (با سریع ترین و جذاب ترین روش علمی) 👈 آموزش کامل و لذت بخش گرامر (مناسب مکالمه و آزمون ها) 👈 تدریس با استفاده از فیلم های جذاب‌. 👈 مناسب برای تمامی آزمون های داخلی و بین المللی. 🛑تعداد ترم ها: 2ترم 🔴 طول ترم اول: 3 هفته با این دوره میتوانید با قدرت حرف بزنید و با اعتماد به نفس در آزمون ها شرکت کن

14 Mar 2019, 22:20 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

مشکل حفظ لغات داری؟ ☄️حفظ 1100&504واژه ضروری ❄️بهار 97❄️ #بهترین_روش یادگیری از نظر متخصصین زبان #کدینگ_تصویری #یادگیری_تضمینی 👇🏿👇 https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEB7eZQgr-9RiCv4UA

11 Mar 2019, 20:21 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dr_nayeriPhoto

۲۰ اسفند سال روز ترور زنده یاد احمد کسروی حقوقدان و روشن‌گر ایرانی است. احمد کسروی و منشی‌ش حدادپور با ۲۷ ضربه چاقو در کاخ دادگستری تهران توسط گروه تروریستی «فداییان اسلام» به جرم توهین به خرافات اسلام و تشیع ترور شدند. ⚛ @dr_nayeri ✍

10 Mar 2019, 19:45 UTC977 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mortad_org

#پرسش_پاسخ در مورد «تفاوت مغز خانم‌ها و‌ آقاها» گفتگو با دکتر تقی کیمیایی‌اسدی(متخصص مغز و اعصاب) از نظر قوای ذهنی هیچ تفاوتی بین آن‌ها نیست. اما آمیگدال مغز خانم‌ها که محل ترس است و قشر جلوپیشانی آن‌ها در بخش‌های مربوط به هم‌دلی و‌ هم‌دردی بزرگ‌تر از مردها است تا از کودکان و اعضای خانواده بهتر مراقبت کنند و اعضای خانواده را بیشتر بهم مرتبط کنند. بقیه‌ی تفاوت‌ها تربیتی بوده و ناشی از سرکوب خانم‌ها توسط مردها طی تاری

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @micro_mindedDenker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,067,810 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خرد انديشان متفکر” (@micro_mindedDenker), 369 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/micro_mindedDenker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.