Channel
@michaelbrueck90
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,179subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001370742876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @michaelbrueck90 |
| Created | 21 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/michaelbrueck90 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 4,179 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 4,184 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 4,182 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 4,182 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 June 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 38,460 |
| Reactions total | 651 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,300 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,474 | 64.1% | |
| 👏 | 260 | 11.3% | |
| 🤬 | 253 | 11.0% | |
| 🤡 | 233 | 10.1% | |
| 🤯 | 42 | 1.83% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 1.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,300reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
WELT schreibt: Der 21-jährige Terrorist Abdul B. war wegen der Vorbereitung einer schweren staatsgefährdenden Straftat in Jugendhaft und kam auf Bewährung mit der Maßgabe frei, ein "Deradikalisierungsprogramm" durchzuführen. Der nächste Termin sollte am morgigen Montag sein. Das ist doch alles komplett irre! Und trotzdem wird es wieder keine Umkehr in der Migrationspolitik geben. Zumal Abdul B. sogar die deutsche St…
👍100🤬9🤯6👏1
Wo bleiben eigentlich die behördlichen Warnungen an die Bevölkerung, dass ein islamistischer Attentäter im psychischen Ausnahmezustand seit rund 11 Stunden auf der Flucht ist? Und eine Gefahr für jedermann darstellen dürfte? Verhaltenshinweise, sensibilisieren? Fehlanzeige. 🧐 Michael Brück Folge gerne meinem Telegramkanal für Einordnungen, Analysen und aktuelle Nachrichten, die noch nicht überall stehen👇 ➡️ http://t…
👏85👍27🤡6🤬2
Da ist schon wieder einer umgekippt: Letztes Jahr zeigte Didi Hallervorden Mut und sendete u.a. beim großen Friedensprotest am Karfreitag ein Grußwort, in dem er sich gegen die Kriegstreiberei in Osteuropa und im Nahen Osten aussprach. Trat bei Wagenknechts Demo auf und zeigte Kanzler Merz sogar nach dessen „Drecksarbeit“-Äußerung an. Und jetzt organisiert er plötzlich eine Tour mit CDU-Spitzenkandidat Sven Schulze, …
👍97🤬22🤡17
Falls sich jemand fragt, wie das Befinden „unserer“ Regierung ist: Es sind Töne wie im Oktober 1989. Michael Brück Folge gerne meinem Telegramkanal für Einordnungen, Analysen und aktuelle Nachrichten, die noch nicht überall stehen👇 ➡️ http://t.me/michaelbrueck90
👍73🤡9🤬5
Unfassbare Lauterbach-Entgleisung: Wer sich nicht gerne abzocken lässt, soll auswandern. Das ist selbst für SPD-Verhältnisse dreist und zeigt, wie abgehoben diese ganze Politikerclique mittlerweile ist. Während junge Fachkräfte in Massen auswandern, werden sie von einem Mitglied der Regierungsparteien regelrecht verhöhnt. Aber klar, was interessiert es die SPD auch, neue Bürger strömen ja fleißig ins Land. Ob die j…
👍69👏6🤯6🤡2
Na sowas: Stade-Killer bringt sich angeblich selber um… 🧐 Neue Häftlinge werden - gerade nach schweren Verbrechen - in besonders überwachten Zellen unter gebracht. Ohne gefährliche Gegenstände, dafür mit Dauerbeobachtung. Um zu verhindern, dass sie sich in solch einer psychischen Ausnahmesituation selbst umbringen. Ist das hier unterblieben? Und wenn ja: Warum? Gibt es etwas zu verschleiern? Die ganze Stade-Sache s…
👍75👏14🤡14🤬5🥰1
Eine Liveschaltung von n-tv über Marla-Svenja Liebich? Da konnte ich nicht widerstehen… Und schwups, wird eilig abgebrochen. 🤡 📣 Michael Brück Folge gerne meinem Telegramkanal für Einordnungen, Analysen und aktuelle Nachrichten, die noch nicht überall stehen👇 ➡️ http://t.me/michaelbrueck90
👍252👏56🤡19🥰17🤬1
✏️ Der Innenminister könnte das Antifa-Bündnis „Widersetzen“ mit einer Verfügung verbieten. Die Ausschreitungen von Erfurt haben einmal mehr gezeigt, wie gefährlich Linksextremismus ist. Dieses Mal hat sich die Gewalt vor allem gegen Pressevertreter gerichtet. Doch statt Distanzierungen verteidigen die Organisatoren des Blockade-Bündnisses die Attacken sogar noch. Spätestens mit dieser Pressekonferenz ist klar: Die …
👍86👏14🤡4🥰1
🪦 Die Antifa als Bewegung ist tot. Ihre fanatischen Anhänger sind jedoch noch gefährlicher 🚨 Das Versagen von Erfurt ist ein weiterer Tiefpunkt in der Antifa-Geschichte, deren Bedeutung seit etwa 15 Jahren kontinuierlich abnimmt. Um es vorweg zu sagen: Linksextremisten bleiben hoch gefährlich, sie sind oft skrupellose Gewalttäter. Aber sie mobilisieren keine gewalttätigen Massen mehr, die in der Lage sind, Chaos zu …
👍103👏11🤡7
🎥 Jetzt gerade: Antifa versteckt sich vor anderer Antifa im besetzten Haus! 😱😬 Ist das ein Spaß: Antideutsche Antifa-Anhänger haben im Osten Berlins heute ein Haus besetzt, um gegen die antiimperialistische Antifa zu protestieren. Die lässt das ganze aber nicht auf sich sitzen, sondern belagert gerade das Haus und greift jeden Antideutschen an, der aus dem besetzten Haus heraus möchte. Tja, ich hole Popcorn und scha…
🤡109🥰15👏12👍7
Erfurt: Das Antifa-Blockadekonzept ist gescheitert 😎 Durch die erfolgreichen Störungen der AfD-Veranstaltungen in Riesa und Gießen hatte die linksextreme Szene Rückenwind und wollte in Erfurt eine neue Qualität ihrer Massenmobilisierung unter Beweis stellen. Das ist vollumfänglich gescheitert. Statt 50.000 Linksextremisten kamen nur rund 15.000. Und die waren erst dann vor Ort, als die AfD-Delegierten längst die Ver…
👍113👏20🤡3🤬1
Geplante Blockade des AfD-Parteitages: Wie der Großraum Erfurt lahm gelegt werden soll und was der Staat machen könnte, wenn er denn wollte. 💡 Nach Gießen ist vor Erfurt. Und nachdem es Linksextremisten bereits Ende November 2025 gelang, durch das Lahmlegen einer gesamten Stadt, die damalige Gründungsveranstaltung der „Generation Deutschland“ zu behindern und deutlich zu verzögern, wird jetzt in noch massiverer Form…
👍83🤬16👏4🤡3🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @michaelbrueck90. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 25,406 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Michael Brück” (@michaelbrueck90), 4,179 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/michaelbrueck90.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.