Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stefan Hartung

Channel

Stefan Hartung

@HartungStefan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,782subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001233171998
TypeChannel
Username@HartungStefan
Created25 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HartungStefan

Growth

2,7802,7822,7816 August 2026 — 2,780 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,780 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,781 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,782 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,780–2,782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:042,782+1
10 Aug 2026, 01:422,781+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:052,780no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:512,780first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
152.0%
avg views ÷ 2,782 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,230
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held19 (5 June 202626 July 2026)
Views total4,230
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40m 40s
Average length
3m 23s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,007 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,38869.2%
28514.2%
👎1979.82%
👏1125.58%
😢251.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,007reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC≈4,230 views105 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Das Recht auf Versammlungsfreiheit ist in einer freiheitlichen Gesellschaft ein unverhandelbares Grundrecht. Auch wenn eine Kundgebung von Menschen, deren Ansichten ich in den allermeisten Punkten nicht teile, von Islamisten angegriffen wird, verurteile ich das aufs Schärfste! Allerdings habe ich aus dieser politischen Richtung diese Bestürzung vermisst, als am 31. Mai 2024 der Islamkritiker Michael Stürzenberger in

👍88👏87👎2

Signed Stefan Hartung

8 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC≈1,360 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiesachsenVideo

Aue-Bad Schlema: Anti-Asylheim-Antrag schlägt weiter hohe Wellen! Heute berichtet auch der alternative Fernsehsender AUF1 in ihrer Nachrichtensendung über den gestrigen Erfolg im Erzgebirge. Eine wichtige Aufklärung, denn die Mainstream-Medien schweigen bisher zum erfolgreichen Antrag von Stefan Hartung und den Freien Sachsen! FREIE SACHSEN: Folgt uns für alle Nachrichten und Informationen bei Telegram! http://t.me

👍826👎5

Signed Stefan Hartung

7 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,850 views121 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bevor ich morgen nochmal im Detail darauf eingehe, kurz das abendliche Resümee: 1. CDU, "Freie Wähler" und SPD haben Angst vor der Öffentlichkeit und auch heute wieder am Video-Verbot festgehalten. Der übervolle Ratssaal wusste dies entsprechend zu bewerten. 2. Die CDU argumentierte und stimmte FÜR(!) den Bauantrag des Landrates! Wie Stadtrat Thomas Colditz sagte, sprach er heute Mittag extra noch mit ihm. Man merk

👍1124👎3👏2

Signed Stefan Hartung

7 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC≈1,380 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiesachsenVideo

Aue-Bad Schlema: Das Rathaus platzt aus allen Nähten, zahlreiche Bürger sind erschienen! Die Erwartungshaltung ist klar: Dieses Asylheim muss verhindert werden. Und die Ablehnung im Strategieausschuss muss der erste Schritt sein! FREIE SACHSEN: Folgt uns für alle Nachrichten und Informationen bei Telegram! http://t.me/freiesachsen

👍83👎2

Signed Stefan Hartung

7 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC≈27,900 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Antrag zur Asyl-Gemeinschaftsunterkunft heute Abend: Jetzt den Klageweg vorbereiten! Die Stadtverwaltung muss jedes rechtliche Mittel nutzen um dieses Vorhaben des Landrates zu verhindern! Heute Abend treffen wir uns um 17:30 vor dem Rathaus zu einer kurzen Kundgebung, in deren Rahmen ich noch einmal auf das eingehe, was der Landrat an der Mulde in Niederschlema geplant hat. Um 18:00 beginnt dann die öffentliche Sit

👍614👎3

Signed Stefan Hartung

3 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,710 views86 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dienstag, 7. Juli: Bauantrag zur Asyl-Unterkunft mit insgesamt 268 Plätzen an der Mulde wird von den Stadträten behandelt! Um 18:00 Uhr tagt der Stadtentwicklungsausschuss des Stadtrates und berät über den Antrag zum Umbau und zur Nutzungsänderung der ehemaligen Bau-Berufsschule in Niederschlema. Diesen stellt der Landrat als Eigentümer des Gebäudes und bittet die Stadt um Erteilung des gemeindlichen Einvernehmens.

👍822👎2

Signed Stefan Hartung

26 Jun 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,780 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiesachsenVideo

Nach Bürgermeisterwahl: Aue versinkt in Gewalt, doch die Presse schweigt! Es war eine trügerische Ruhe, die in den Tagen vor der Oberbürgermeister-Stichwahl in Aue herrschte. Fast wirkte es, als hätte jemand die jungen, fast ausnahmslos migrantischen Männer, die sonst in der Innenstadt für Unruhe und Unsicherheit sorgen, angehalten, bloß für keine neuen Aufreger zu sorgen und das von der CDU verbreitete Märchen der

👎508👍5

Signed Stefan Hartung

19 Jun 2026, 14:02 UTC≈2,080 views125 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiesachsenVideo

Zahlreiche Gesetzesverstöße: Oberbürgermeisterwahl in Aue-Bad Schlema angefochten! Paukenschlag: Die Freien Sachsen haben am heutigen Tag juristische Schritte gegen das angebliche Ergebnis der Oberbürgermeisterwahl von Aue-Bad Schlema eingeleitet und die Wahl offiziell angefochten. Vor knapp zwei Wochen siegte Stefan Hartung nach Auszählung der Urnenwahllokale mit etwa 53 % gegen den CDU-Kontrahenten, doch nach den

👏92👍246👎3

Signed Stefan Hartung

10 Jun 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,170 views100 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiesachsenVideo

Corona-Täter Spahn feiert „Sieg“ seines Genossen in Aue-Bad Schlema! 😡 Eine erzgebirgische Oberbürgermeisterwahl ist Thema Nr. 1 im ganzen Land. Und während der CDU-Kandidat (der 2024, nach Merkel, Coronawahn und antirussischer Aggression erst in die Partei eingetreten ist) im Wahlkampf so getan hat, als hätte er mit all der großen Politik doch gar nichts zu tun und sei der nette Christdemokrat von nebenan, brüstet

👎914👍4👏1

Signed Stefan Hartung

9 Jun 2026, 08:33 UTC≈6,830 views136 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Der geplante Putsch gegen die freiheitlich-demokratische Grundordnung: Mein Wahlversprechen war schon immer – und nicht erst seit der OB-Wahl 2026 –, Politik transparenter zu machen und die echte freiheitliche Demokratie gegen ihre Feinde aus dem linken Lager zu verteidigen. Ein großer Teil der Alt-Medien gehört offenkundig zu diesem politischen Machtapparat. Für den Fall meines Wahlsieges wurde bereits angekündigt

👍1268👎2

Signed Stefan Hartung

8 Jun 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,220 views135 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @michaelbrueck90Photo

Um das alles mal einzuordnen: Ein Patriot, der von der Mainstreampresse als „rechts der AfD“ und „noch rechtsextremer“ (plus allen möglichen Zuschreibungen) diffamiert wurde, hat gestern in der größten Stadt des Erzgebirges die absolute Mehrheit nur knapp verfehlt. Fast jeder Zweite hat Stefan Hartung gewählt. Trotz wochenlanger Hetzkampagne. Trotz Behauptungen, in der Stadt würde Chaos ausbrechen, Fördergelder von

👍11419👎2

Signed Stefan Hartung

8 Jun 2026, 08:20 UTC≈28,300 views177 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ergebnisse wie 60 % in Oberschlema und Wildbach, aber auch 57 % in der Auer Innenstadt sprechen eine klare Sprache: Viele Bürger - überall in unserer Stadt - wollten den Wechsel. Sie wollten einen Oberbürgermeister, der Klartext redet und Mut beweist. Doch leider war das Altparteien-Kartell diesmal noch knapp stärker. Das "Weiter so" hat sich dank der Schützenhilfe von Seiten der Medien samt ihrer Dreck-Kampagnen ge

👍14321👏9👎4

Signed Stefan Hartung

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @HartungStefan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,630 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stefan Hartung” (@HartungStefan), 2,782 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HartungStefan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.