Channel
@miashhj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002406576666 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miashhj |
| Description | @an0nmyash_bot an0n |
| Created | 29 December 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miashhj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 60 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 60 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 29 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (29 December 2024 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 148 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,922 reactions across 8 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.01% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 154 | 8.01% | |
| 🆒 | 145 | 7.54% | |
| custom 5238099087219266795 | 141 | 7.34% | |
| 💘 | 101 | 5.25% | |
| custom 5373350510768174841 | 97 | 5.05% | |
| custom 5470135069047812038 | 91 | 4.73% | |
| 🍓 | 91 | 4.73% | |
| custom 5287272996719855780 | 88 | 4.58% | |
| custom 5350668118463108419 | 83 | 4.32% | |
| custom 5406729166936632097 | 80 | 4.16% | |
| custom 5467633121748876928 | 80 | 4.16% | |
| custom 5471944878072025417 | 67 | 3.49% | |
| 🦄 | 62 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5325712322658854095 | 58 | 3.02% | |
| custom 5260448052623197709 | 41 | 2.13% | |
| custom 5258188229810626263 | 39 | 2.03% | |
| custom 5237728418656717950 | 38 | 1.98% | |
| custom 5240213044352548668 | 37 | 1.93% | |
| custom 5247250872253032535 | 34 | 1.77% | |
| custom 5309855032819072321 | 32 | 1.66% | |
| 27 further kinds | 363 | 18.9% |
Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,922reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @miashhj. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 December 2024 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
File, posted without a caption
custom 52494167941956612044custom 54426250304228273054custom 54449291987727479504custom 52492992753005054753custom 54495530789592454353custom 52627630915353635652custom 54450254532848182402custom 54494989323065446912
🤩
File, posted without a caption
custom 523809908721926679562custom 528727299671985578049custom 547013506904781203845custom 546763312174887692821custom 525818822981062626320custom 526044805262319770920custom 524002830921921215419custom 524021304435254866819
🗒🗒🗒
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤꨄ︎| ... MAIN / REQUEST ... |♡ ᪲᪲᪲а – КТО ЖЕ ГЛАВНЫЙ ИРЛ Суа ?? ╰┈➤ . . . и это 「 @naymmeovv! 」
custom 546763312174887692859custom 547013506904781203846custom 528727299671985578039custom 526044805262319770921custom 525818822981062626319custom 523809908721926679518custom 524021304435254866818custom 544496011394734554818
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 523809908721926679539🕊24custom 530800104146628869918custom 581453469248913890112custom 53257123226588540959custom 52380222631392410468custom 54273487079242607028👻7
🌟🌟.⋆𐙚₊˚⊹♡꒰ঌᰔᩚ໒꒱.𝒽𝒶𝒾 ！！😻🌟.🌟 1.🤩🤩𝑚𝑦 𝑡𝑔𝑐 » » 𝑡𝑖𝑘𝑡𝑜𝑘～ ˚ ༘ ೀ⋆｡˚ ．。🌸 🤩🤩 ✩‧₊🌸''🤩🤩🤩🤩 .🤩😻🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟 https://t.me/+on10ztQUBLRmZDcy. .
custom 547194487807202541767custom 532571232265885409549custom 528279791997029377231custom 523809908721926679522custom 523772841865671795019custom 541788131151370294519🕊17custom 519720252888581812117
𝑤ℎ𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑢 𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒?.? 🌷 💘:𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑑.🎀 🆒: 𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝𝑠/𝑐𝑓.🌺 🍓:𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑚𝑒.😻🏳🏳🏳🏳🏳 🕊:𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘𝑒𝑟?.?🤍 🦄:ℎ𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑒>.<🌟 🐰:𝑤𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑡.🎀 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟...🎀
🆒118custom 540672916693663209780🕊58💘33🦄32🍓30custom 523772841865671795019custom 518824537459000994017
⭐ 🌷🦴2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣8️⃣ 🦴 😻🤩🤩9️⃣🔟1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘮𝘦.!🩶🩶🤍🦴🦴↓↓
custom 535066811846310841983🍓47💘31custom 524725087225303253517🦄15custom 530985503281907232115custom 518824537459000994014🕊13
🤍🤍🪦🪦🪦«m𝑦𝑎𝑠ℎ/𝑠u𝑘𝑎»♡ !! 🤍🤍😻 « 😻, 𝑠ℎ𝑒/ℎe𝑠, ??? 🤩🤩🤩» ::😻 3w4, sх3 & 361, 𝑓𝑒𝑣𝑙 ,,08.11.? ᴀnxiᴏus-ᴀvᴏidᴀnᴛ,, 𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑙! 🤩..𝒶𝓃𝒹 ʍᴇlᴀnᴄhᴏliᴄ-ᴩhlᴇgʍᴀᴛiᴄ🤩 🤩 𖤐⭒๋࣭ ⭑ «それはいいですね»。♪ >.< 𝐼𝑚 𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑦, 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑓𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑑𝑚!.! 🦴 « 𝒌𝒊n𝒏𝒊𝒆s: 🤩 𝑦𝑢𝑟𝑎, 𝑚𝑢𝑢, 𝑠𝑢𝑎 🎀🎀 𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝑡𝑠𝑢𝑘𝑖𝑚𝑖, 𝑦𝑢𝑢𝑛𝑎, 𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑜𝑛..» 🎀🎀
custom 537335051076817484197🕊42💘37custom 521116739171046531517custom 530985503281907232117custom 530783212899245636716🦄15custom 535513495746539265615
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @miashhj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 432,874 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@miashhj named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“︎” (@miashhj), 60 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miashhj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.