#颁布最高可判处死刑的《打击网络诈骗法》 2026年8月1日 据了解,联邦议会于昨天(7月31日)审议通过并颁布了《打击网络诈骗法草案》,涉网络诈骗最高可被判处死刑。 该法作为2026年联邦议会第(3)号法律颁布,旨在有效打击网络金融诈骗活动,其中包含严厉的惩罚措施以及能够迅速阻断资金流向的相关程序。 根据该法规定,如果在网络诈骗中心(Scam Center)内犯有人口贩运、虐待或非法拘禁等罪行的,可判处10年至终身监禁;若造成人员死亡的,则必须判处死刑。 此外,规定还明确,若经核实确认遭遇资金诈骗,相关机构必须在15分钟内立即冻结可疑银行账户,并赋予相关部门临时暂停可疑账户长达72小时的权限。 据悉,该《打击网络诈骗法》共计12章、63条,详细规定了网络诈骗防范措施、禁止行为以及相关处罚条例。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔

Channel
木姐//缅北// 东南亚新闻//缅甸新闻
@miandian880099
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
336subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003685010174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miandian880099 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miandian880099 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 336 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 338 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.3%
- avg views ÷ 336 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 34.5
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (28 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 483 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 40s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#网友投稿 大其力的朋友们请小心。不要因为说自己要去上班、房间锁好了就掉以轻心。今天我去外面的时候,明明锁了房门,但他们用钥匙进屋偷走了东西 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
#懵逼??? 什么鬼,Telegram 杜叔叔和小马哥合体了吗? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔 、
#突发情况 木姐户纳 1名不明武装,扛着AK给1男的突突没了。 👉🏻受害者照片👈🏻 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
🇲🇲 #东枝瑞娘市汽车配件店命案 顾客持刀报复致一死一伤 缅甸掸邦南部东枝县瑞娘市,一家名为日本的汽车配件店发生血案 一名顾客因两天前购货时与店主发生价格争执,心怀不满,持刀闯入店内行凶。 店主夫妇双双被刺,女性店主当场死亡,男性店主头部受伤 案件正在调查中。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
🇲🇲 #敏昂莱批评外国媒体 将电诈问题归咎于缅甸 缅甸军政府领导人敏昂莱7月31日表示,外国媒体将缅甸描绘成电信诈骗问题的主要责任方,对此提出批评。 他称,约75%的电诈犯罪嫌疑人为外国公民,经由邻国非法进入缅甸从事诈骗活动。 敏昂莱还表示,诈骗集团使用的星链通信设备、电脑配件均从境外非法输入,资金结算也依赖外国银行系统。 他指出,电诈问题曾引发缅甸东北地区冲突,国家为此付出了巨大代价 缅方表示将继续与中国、泰国等友好国家合作,打击网络诈骗和跨境犯罪。 此外,缅甸政府于7月28日正式通过《网络安全法》和《技术法》草案,称此举旨在更有效防范和打击网络诈骗及网络犯罪。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
#网友投稿 🇲🇲大其力 近期连续强降雨,淹没了道路,也影响了许多人的生活 洪水风险不断增加 请大家尽量避免前往低洼地区、河道附近,注意出行安全 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
#网友投稿 今天下午在木姐专做三号路抓到一名小偷,不知道是哪里的被某个民团抓到后审问 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
#网友投稿 今天是缅甸的“瓦索满月日”(Full Moon Day of Waso,ဝါဆိုလပြည့်နေ့) 腊戌曼苏人特别的多 人山人海 也是佛教安居开始日(雨安居开始日),属于缅甸全国公共假日 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
🇲🇲 #军政府称安全局势未稳 昔卜大桥暂无开放计划 7月29日,缅甸军政府表示,因昔卜地区安全局势尚未稳定,暂无重新开放昔卜大桥的计划 军政府称,目前仅控制昔卜城区及9个村组,其余地区仍由MNDAA和TNLA控制。 当地议员指出,大桥关闭已导致民众在交通、医疗、教育和经济方面面临严重困难。 据介绍,大桥自2025年11月关闭至今已近一年,期间民众需乘船过河,已造成19人溺亡。 尽管当地民众持续呼吁恢复通行,但军政府表示将在安全条件成熟后才考虑开放。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
#2026上半年掸邦交通事故 致94死 全国死亡人数上升 缅甸道路运输管理局数据显示,2026年上半年掸邦发生交通事故151起,致197人受伤、94人死亡,较2025年同期(154起、126死)有所下降。 全国范围看,上半年共发生事故1686起,受伤2371人,死亡932人,死亡人数较去年同期大幅增加。事故最多的省份为仰光(360起)、伊洛瓦底(270起)、勃固(260起)、曼德勒(223起)和掸邦(151起)。 死亡人数方面,仰光191人居首,曼德勒128人、勃固122人、伊洛瓦底113人、掸邦94人。 仰光-曼德勒高速路上半年发生70起事故,致43人死亡。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
🇲🇲 #密支那 鸡蛋价格飙升至每枚千余缅元 近日,密支那市鸡蛋价格涨至每枚约1000缅元,创历史新高。据当地居民反映,主要原因是密支那-曼德勒道路封闭,导致鸡蛋供应受阻。 目前,鸡蛋每枚售价在900至1300缅元之间。莫宁、葡萄等地同样涨至每枚1000缅元左右。 当地养鸡场数量本就减少,需依赖外地供应,道路封闭后更推高了价格。奶茶店卤蛋售价也随之涨至约2000缅元。 此外,肉、鱼及其他基本食品价格也在上涨。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🔔
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @miandian880099. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,007,552 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“木姐//缅北// 东南亚新闻//缅甸新闻” (@miandian880099), 336 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miandian880099.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.