Channel
@mianbeichigua111
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003846422076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mianbeichigua111 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 22 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mianbeichigua111 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 47 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 48 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 51 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 53 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 56 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 56 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 55 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友投稿 #吃瓜 这个女的就是一个渣女叫 #微微 胶脉的原来在雍景台20栋做人事 听说现在26度酒店做人事 给中国人做小三，，说了也正常我就是找工作的都来和我睡了几次,被我睡了不去他们公司带组就各种各样叫我买东西给她 让我给他买手机没有给他买就拉黑 真无语 老子都还在用16PM哪里来的钱给你买17P M，我只是咨询工作是你自己跑来让我干，现在想让我当接盘侠吗？觉得我污蔑他现在的男朋友可以看看他b上是不是有痣
❤2
#吃瓜 缅甸小姐姐 和小男友在酒店做羞羞的视频 分手后被渣男 男友爆出来了
#吃瓜 缅甸小情侣为求刺激在酒店开房啪啪啪 自拍视频被男友曝光流出
缅甸极品身材小骚货和男友做爱视频流出
#网友分享 缅甸小情侣在酒店做爱的视频 被她的男友的曝光出来了
❤2
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @mianbeichigua111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅北（吃瓜搞笑）🍉曝光 ｜自拍” (@mianbeichigua111), 47 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mianbeichigua111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.