: ➿•➿🐝нтерактив от вуны! ➿•➿ 🥂:: Wuna the real summer, grr какая вы косметика?😠 условия: быть подписаным(проверю) репост в канал отправить аву канала или тг отправить псевдо ⭐• : tegs : #NaiWuna #интерактив #Summer #grr

Channel
𐌼𐌹𐌳𐍰𐌹𐌼 𐌴𐌽𐍄𐌴𐍂𐍄𐌳𐌹𐌽𐌼𐌴𐌽𐍄
@mialiment
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004328255703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mialiment |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 21 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mialiment |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 10 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 10 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
CRASH-LIST ℂ𝕆𝕄ℙ𝔸ℕ𝕐: @softlabel1 @mialiment @NAYAMI_ENTERTAINMENT @stellarenter @cat_entertaiment3 𝕊𝕆𝕃𝕆: @yunmi_solo_kenshin @Solli_solnik @soheerock @NaiWuna ℂ𝕆𝕍𝔼ℝ-𝔾ℝ𝕆𝕌ℙ @astralcvg ℍ𝔼𝕃ℙ: @astat_help порядок не имеет значения!!
🍓1
🐻❄️:ваа мы в краш листе
❤🔥1
🐻❄️:Хотите инт?
🍓1
Доброе утро
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🐻❄️:Вуна го дружить
~~ ૮ꪚꪋઽꫝ ꪶꪱઽꫂ ~~~ SOLO https://t.me/yumiofficall https://t.me/NaiWuna https://t.me/Hwangg_Leriss11 https://t.me/ch0nsu JOURNALIST https://t.me/leslijour https://t.me/journalist_fox COMPANY https://t.me/shining_voice_entr https://t.me/lionenterOI https://t.me/Nass_entertainment GRUPP Нет . Порядок не имеет значения!! Не расстраивайтесь если не попали в наш краш лист!.
👍1
🌱// @𝒀u𝒎𝒊𝑺olO (#我爱你)🌟 . 우리 🆕⌗ 2026 BeSt % 100 >>ARIANA GRANDE// поддержим Юми! поставим много реакций и много комм! спасибо ⭐️: c𝗼v͟͟𝗲ʀ ву yuMii. . [🌟] ** 📰 . @yumiofficall👄 🤩. ‐ ‐ yumi # ๋࣭ > 🤩 OMG THIS YUMI!››🤩 #yumi #solo #ои
🐻❄️: сегодня сделаю краш лист,ждите)
:: ➿•➿🐝ew🐝ideo➿•➿ | :: 🥂:: Wuna the real summer, grr 🐝🐝🐝🐝🐝: 🤍 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦вуна когда увидела новый ои🌟🌟tik tok🌟 💛::shh! поддержите реакцией и коментарием! ⭐• : tegs : #NaiWuna #video #Summer #grr
🐻❄️:Делать краш лист?
🍓1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mialiment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,123,458 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@yumiofficall · 853 postsWuna solo || berry🍓
@NaiWuna · 602 postsхелп от астата
@astat_help · 9,6001 post𐐼𝗌𝘁𝗿𐐼𝗹 𝗰ꪜ𝗴
@astralcvg · 1061 post𝘾𝙖𝙩 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 🕊
@cat_entertaiment3 · 5041 postᯓ Hwang leriss☀️
@Hwangg_Leriss11 · 2131 postРЕСТ # 🕯️ / 𝒿ℴ𝓊𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉 𝑭𝑶𝑿 🤎 / ☕ }
@journalist_fox · 151 post.
@leslijour · 561 postlion entertainment 🐾
@lionenterOI · 481 postƝαss
@Nass_entertainment · 6451 post𝕾𝐡𝙞𝗻𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝑽𝐨𝗶𝐜𝐞 𝑬𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭
@shining_voice_entr · 1121 postSoft label
@softlabel1 · 491 post𓆩𐍃᧐-𐋏ᥱᥱ Ꞧ᧐ᥴκ-ꞩᴛᥲɍ𓆪
@soheerock · 891 post᥉ᥱbιᥒ//SOLO
@Solli_solnik · 141 postᏚᴛᴇllᴀr ᵉᶰᵗᵉʳᵗᵃᶦᶰᵐᵉᶰᵗ
@stellarenter · 1351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mialiment named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𐌼𐌹𐌳𐍰𐌹𐌼 𐌴𐌽𐍄𐌴𐍂𐍄𐌳𐌹𐌽𐌼𐌴𐌽𐍄” (@mialiment), 10 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mialiment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.