Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

mяkissh 🫀

@miakissh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002743898660
TypeChannel
Username@miakissh
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 16 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/miakissh

Growth

151615.59 August 2026 — 16 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15–16 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:0115no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:5815-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:4516first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
37
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓3435.1%
custom 53504388702887110061616.5%
💋99.28%
🔥99.28%
88.25%
💔77.22%
custom 532369854993270494566.19%
custom 538874859129459611266.19%
💘22.06%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2025 to 15 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Feb 2026, 19:06 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Друзя ч не ебу чо с клменькмт я их сломала ну и хуц с ними

4🍓1💘1

Signed Кiшка

15 Feb 2026, 18:59 UTC107 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @buravckPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥6🍓4

Signed Кiшка

15 Feb 2026, 18:59 UTC111 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ой ну и шедевроколлаб с братишкой обязан остаться в истории етова канальчека

🍓52💋2

Signed Кiшка

15 Feb 2026, 18:57 UTC114 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Эти скепчики могли бы стать шедеврами, но я: а) еблан б)без сил, так что пусть хоть в таком виде будут... Хз может доведу до красоты что-нибудь когда уволюсь..... когда-нибудь..

💋7🍓4🔥31💘1

Signed Кiшка

12 Oct 2025, 18:42 UTC107 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Честно говоря, что-то я какую-то полнейшую хуйню рисую последние так..года полтора.

💔7🍓5custom 532369854993270494521

Signed Кiшка

5 Oct 2025, 18:20 UTC101 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хуй знает зачем я их рисую... Ну... наверное лучше чем ничего

🍓6

Signed Кiшка

5 Oct 2025, 18:20 UTC104 viewsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Кiшка

5 Oct 2025, 18:19 UTC94 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мужчинке #c

🍓6custom 53504388702887110063

Signed Кiшка

16 Sept 2025, 18:48 UTC80 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Друзья, ваша честная реакция, если я стану румангакой?????

custom 53504388702887110067custom 53887485912945961123custom 53236985499327049452🍓1

Signed Кiшка

16 Sept 2025, 18:47 UTC78 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Дефчонке #c

custom 53504388702887110066custom 53887485912945961123🍓2custom 53236985499327049452

Signed Кiшка

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @miakissh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 850,625 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mяkissh 🫀” (@miakissh), 15 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miakissh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.