Channel
@mhsf01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
122subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002849347548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mhsf01 |
| Description | 深耕外贸潮品多年，主打同源品质鞋包、腕表 所有商品实拍验货，做工精细，性价比拉满 支持全球邮寄，部分地区货到付款，批发 / 零售均可 微信：7166080 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mhsf01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 122 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 122 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 303 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
⭐️⭐️⭐️星链互推 - B5车⭐️⭐️⭐️ AD：十万全国楼凤资源🔥每日更新 AD：海量资源免费搜片群 1. ✈️【查一切】聊天记录➏开房记录➏通话记录➏开盒➏查档✈️ 2. 重庆楼凤大全 3. 上海兼职楼凤大全 4. 御女宫香港三级片频道 5. 广州一手妹妹上门 6. 武汉兼职楼凤大全 7. 日本av东京（无码）（强奸）按摩 出轨 8. TT外围俱乐部 全国一二线 高端定制🔥 9. 杭州极品品茶外围 10. SPA按摩/男技师/夫妻SPA 11. 南昌外围品茶 12. 91国产、网红视频、萝莉、空姐、学生、老师福利群 AD：引流神器自动发片机 AD：👉全网破解资源免费搜索👈
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 百达翡丽 Patek Philippe 惊艳登场 配进口 9100 多功能机芯 年会C位非它莫属了吧 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 欧米茄最新一代星座 经典派盘表盘复刻OMEGA新品到货 戴在手上就是低调的高级 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 欧米茄第四代海马系列海洋宇宙腕表 这抹亮橙色简直是腕间小太阳 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 百达翡丽复杂功能计时系列5172G-001系列 三个小表盘暗藏机械猛兽属性 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 欧米伽/OMEGA 四代星座永恒经典款 间金钢带拿捏住了复古千金感 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 欧米伽/OMEGA 四代星座永恒经典款 白盘配钻石就是温婉本婉 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 欧米伽/OMEGA 四代星座永恒经典款 把星光焊在手腕上的浪漫 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 伯爵今年新款推出胶带POLO系列，热门小手雷 这深邃蓝盘简直是梦中情表 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 江诗丹顿历史名作系列4200H/222A.延续传奇222的设计 有人说运动表很难兼顾优雅，但这只表做到了很好的平衡 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 新款百达古典系列女款，型号7200/50G-012 如果说上一只是克制的机械美学，那这只百达翡丽带来的则是一封写给旧时光的情书 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
#高仿手表 #复刻手表 #劳力士 #江诗丹顿 #百达翡丽 爱彼皇家橡树离岸型26231st系列，“APS同源机芯”爱彼女表天花板之作. 谁说运动表不能有千金感？这反差萌我爱了，甜酷天花板 #全球可邮 #一件可发 🔸威信：7166080
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mhsf01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 519,465 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“轻奢生活优选 | 鞋履箱包腕表货源” (@mhsf01), 122 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mhsf01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.