Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MGTOW ENG

@mgtowENG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

516subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001639982582
TypeChannel
Username@mgtowENG
DescriptionThis channel is about exposing the rigged game and giving you the redpill. SELF IMPROVEMENT IS A MUST NO EXCUSES IMPROVEMENT IS A MUST https://t.me/mgtowENG @mgtowgym for workout music sent to us by you guys Admin: @niggarijec
Created7 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mgtowENG

Growth

5167 Aug 2026, 07:34 — 516 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 516 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:347 Aug 2026, 07:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 515–517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:46516no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:34516first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
293
Videos
149
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

433 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10925.2%
😁8720.1%
7216.6%
🤡378.55%
👏296.70%
🔥266.00%
🤮225.08%
112.54%
💯112.54%
❤‍🔥92.08%
🖕71.62%
🥱51.15%
🏆20.462%
🤯20.462%
🌚10.231%
🍌10.231%
💔10.231%
😱10.231%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 433reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2024 to 18 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Nov 2024, 16:20 UTC≈1,540 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁20🤮13👏2🌚1👍1😱1

10 Nov 2024, 14:34 UTC≈1,330 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @trvecelarmyVideo

Video, posted without a caption

10👍7

14 Sept 2024, 08:14 UTC≈1,650 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥10👍321

30 Aug 2024, 13:15 UTC≈1,720 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CoreyJMahler

Having any women involved anywhere in politics — at any level, in any way — is sinful and a curse from God. ✠

👍24💯3🤯2

19 Aug 2024, 09:07 UTC≈2,010 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

What are all these women going to do once they realize they made a horrible mistake?

👏271🍌1

13 Aug 2024, 15:11 UTC≈1,530 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @trvecelarmyVideo

https://t.me/trvecelarmy

🔥132🏆2

23 Jul 2024, 13:52 UTC≈1,620 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @trvecelarmyVideo

https://t.me/trvecelarmy

16😁6

15 Jul 2024, 19:48 UTC≈1,650 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @trvecelarmyPhoto

https://t.me/trvecelarmy

😁15👍10🔥2

13 Jul 2024, 09:38 UTC≈1,450 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @trvecelarmyPhoto

https://t.me/trvecelarmy

👍19🤡6

13 Jun 2024, 20:25 UTC≈1,720 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Man get's his wife to sign a pre-nup Yet in the end, during the divorce court, the female judge just throws it out of the window Still believe in a legal, political solution?

🤡29👍4🖕3

29 May 2024, 12:32 UTC≈2,120 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍275🤡1

26 May 2024, 07:54 UTC≈1,600 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WhoreschwitzPhoto

Every form of maladaptive sexual perversion is not only tolerated in the West but actively promoted, including pedophilia via "drag queen story hours," while breeding during prime years — which produces healthier children who grow up to be more right-wing — is demonized. This sick civilization is on its deathbed. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3548

👍81

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mgtowENG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MGTOW ENG” (@mgtowENG), 516 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mgtowENG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.