Если какая-то из команд в Казани готова сняться с нами в челлендже, — мы готовы зарубиться на бабки! Ваши парни против наших!
❤8🔥3👌2🤣2

Channel
@mfcflorida
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
147subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002063920324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mfcflorida |
| Description | Это Telegram канал Медиа ФК Флорида (коллектива, основанного ещё в 1911 году во времена Российской Империи). Новая история клуба, начавшаяся в 2024 году, обещает возродить историю легендарного клуба и возродить интерес жителей г.Казани к футболу. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mfcflorida |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 147 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 147 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
170 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 55 | 32.4% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 28.8% | |
| 🤣 | 24 | 14.1% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 5.88% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 4.12% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 3.53% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 2.94% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.35% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.76% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 1.76% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 1.18% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.588% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.588% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2024 to 8 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если какая-то из команд в Казани готова сняться с нами в челлендже, — мы готовы зарубиться на бабки! Ваши парни против наших!
❤8🔥3👌2🤣2
Сняли пачку футбольных челленджей, — скоро всё увидите на нашем YouTube! А пока предлагаем вам насладиться кусочком с предстоящего ролика. Кому-то явно нужно научиться попадать по мячу и по воротам 😂
😁4❤2👍2🔥2
Флорида встречалась с Воздухом дважды, — это были наши самая первая и самая последняя игры турнира. По итогу обоих матчей: забито по 3 гола друг другу. Обе встречи были жаркими, и у всех были претензии, но всё, что остаётся на поле, — должно оставаться на поле, не так ли? Администрация Флориды не обращалась в лигу с просьбами внимательно рассмотреть эпизоды игры, где «Воздуханы» (т.е. игроки ФК Воздух) распускают св…
❤5🤣3🔥2😢2
ШОК-НОВОСТИ Нашей команде засчитали техническое поражение в матче против (теперь уже точно) непобежденного ФК Воздух
🔥6😢4💔3❤1
🙂 Снимали сегодня челленджи, ловите короткий кусочек из предстоящего большого ролика
🔥13❤4👌2
Вот настолько тренерский штаб в шоке 😂😂😂
🔥5🤣2❤1👍1
И так, — давайте понаблюдаем за тем, как Булат Шокер (или Олег, или Шокериньо (у него много имён)) забил гол, а затем много раз не забил. Тренерский штаб в шоке 😱
🔥5❤🔥1👍1🤣1
Саныч: «Безобразная игра была! Олег, ты меня за*бал! Заканчиваем на этом…» Матч окончен со счётом 2:1 в нашу пользу. Наша команда одержала победу над соперником, который за сезон ни разу не проиграл и занял первое место в турнирной таблице (мы заняли третье место). В матче было очень много интриг, позже скинем все видео-подробности. Даже была драка… 😱 Получается, что МФК Флорида победители чемпионов! 😂 От всей души…
🔥7🤣3🤷♂2💘1
Игра прервана, потому что на поле выбежал болельщик без FAN ID
❤15👍3🔥2😁1
Тренерский штаб во время перерыва: «Нам не нужно сегодня выиграть!»
🔥6❤5🤗3
🟨 Пенальти в ворота ФК Воздух UPD: ФК Воздух забил быстрый гол после полученной красной карточки; Макс Пасынков сравнял счёт, пробив пенальти в правый от вратаря угол; счёт 1:1
❤4🔥2🤗2🤣1
МФК Флорида — ФК Воздух Матч уже начался 🟥 Судья показывает красную карточку игроку ФК Воздух в конце первого тайма, на стадионе гробовая тишина, все шокированы
❤4🔥2🤗2🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mfcflorida. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Голосование!!! Кого больше хочешь увидеть без волос и с поражением?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2024 to 8 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,024,055 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МФК ФЛОРИДА” (@mfcflorida), 147 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mfcflorida.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.