Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dark forest

@mevdiggers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

823subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001600694288
TypeChannel
Username@mevdiggers
CreatedBetween 1 November 2021 and 25 July 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mevdiggers

Growth

823824823.57 Aug 2026, 06:26 — 824 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:32 — 824 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:56 — 823 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:267 Aug 2026, 16:56
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 823–824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 16:56823-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:32824no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:26824first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10864.3%
🔥4023.8%
63.57%
❤‍🔥63.57%
21.19%
👏21.19%
💩21.19%
🌚10.595%
🤯10.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2022 to 24 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2023, 11:14 UTC≈4,960 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Идеальная тюрьма. Hedging LP uni v3 with options

👍6👏2

16 Aug 2023, 13:44 UTC≈4,050 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Разлок токенов как стратегия

👍7

3 Aug 2023, 21:42 UTC≈3,750 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://quantpedia.com если у кого-то имеется подписка или планирует покупать, есть предложение пошейрить оплату Пишите @isop9

24 May 2023, 12:42 UTC≈4,670 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хеджирование LP позиций Uniswap V3

💩2

22 Feb 2023, 15:22 UTC≈2,600 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

25 января всем известный агрегатор 1inch представил свое обновление под названием Fusion. Этот мод должен облегчить пользовательский опыт, а также сэкономить деньги пользователей. Fusion-мод, частично основанный на уже существующих технологиях (1inch Limit Order Protocol, 1inch Aggregation Protocol, 1inch Swap Engine) – позволяет пользователям размещать свои ордера, с указанной ценой и временным диапазоном, не платя

👍42🌚1🤯1

31 Oct 2022, 15:02 UTC≈1,920 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

MEV в эпоху Proof-of-Stake ч.3 Сбор данных Прежде чем приступить к анализу MEV-Boost, мы должны определить конечный набор данных. Такие как информацию консенсус уровня (builder_publickey, proposer_payment или slotnr), а также данные экзекюшн уровеня (eth1_fee_recipient), и информацию о каждой транзакции, включенной в соответствующие блоки. Можно использовать Relay API для анализа каждого блока с момента слияния и сб

🔥9

24 Oct 2022, 08:33 UTC≈1,250 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

MEV в эпоху Proof-of-Stake ч.2 Что такое MEV-Boost? MEV-Boost создан компанией Flashbots и представляет собой дополнительное программное обеспечение, использующее разделение инициации и создания (Proposer-builder separation или PBS). Валидаторы могут использовать MEV-Boost, чтобы самостоятельно идентифицировать MEV в предлагаемых ими блоках. Его цель - демократизировать процесс извлечения MEV, открыв его для обычны

👍16

24 Oct 2022, 08:31 UTC926 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

MEV в эпоху Proof-of-Stake ч.1 С блоком 15 537 393 Ethereum завершил переход на proof-of-stake. Если на уровне dApps все осталось более или менее без изменений, то консенсус Ethereum был полностью переработан. Ethereum 2.0 отличается не только улучшенной безопасностью и централизацией, но и новой терминологией, которую необходимо знать при анализе данных. В последние недели я начал копаться в данных, которые вместе

❤‍🔥6

13 Oct 2022, 11:28 UTC≈1,060 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Состояние MEV дел на Co-smosis С момента запуска Osmosis поисковики MEV получили примерно 7 млн$ профита, при этом заплатив комиссий за транзакции на 50к$. При том, что половину общего профита делят 5 ботов. 16% от всех транзакций на osmosis пришлись на MEV и 87% (из тех 16%) были фиктивными, что приводит к пустой трате места в блоке, высокие комиссии и т.д Относительно недавно, кофаундер Osmosis Sunny Aggarwal дал

👍7

12 Oct 2022, 10:36 UTC904 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://twitter.com/fintechintern/status/1579487695575060487 Твитор спэйс 12 октября 2 pm utc, The block x Hasu. Будут разговаривать за Mev. Стоит послушать. Возможно позже сделаем транскриб и перевод

🔥11

9 Sept 2022, 08:50 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 7 August 2026

Кто знает или засекал с какой частотой идёт забор timestamps у Uni v.2 для TWAP?

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mevdiggers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,154,700 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dark forest” (@mevdiggers), 823 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mevdiggers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.