Channel

Методолог рассказывает

@metodology_prosto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

155subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001174870508
Type	Channel
Username	@metodology_prosto
Created	Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 September 2026
Measurements held	4
Confirmed unchanged	2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/metodology_prosto

Growth

4 measurements spanning 29 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 155–158 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
4 Sept 2026, 22:41	155	-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:53	156	-2
8 Aug 2026, 18:01	158	no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:18	158	first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	41	39.0%
❤	28	26.7%
🔥	25	23.8%
👏	4	3.81%
👀	2	1.90%
😁	2	1.90%
🥰	2	1.90%
🙏	1	0.952%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2025 to 6 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Nov 2025, 13:49 UTC45 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Проверь, не пустослов ли ты? Недавно я проводила аудит одного обучающего проекта. 20 уроков, длительность до 25 минут. Первые уроки я смотрела и не понимала, что мне не нравится, что тут не так? И вскоре до меня дошло, что 70% времени в уроке – вода, лишние слова, неясные паузы. Обучающий материал реально классный, опыт эксперта – шикарен. Но вот эти ничего не значащие фразы, бессмысленные предложения портили всю ка…

👍5