Исследуем, применяем, пишем (да, и в телеграме!)
Студенческое научное общество
«Методы и тексты» РГГУ.
Научно организуем, популяризируем, мемим.
Научный руководитель — А.А. Киличенков, доктор исторических наук.
ВК — https://vk.com/methodsandtexts
Created
Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 847–849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 01:19
848
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:09
848
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 848 subscribers
Avg views / post
179
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held
8 (8 May 2026 – 20 July 2026)
Views total
179
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,400
Videos
≈12
Links
≈300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
105 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
26
24.8%
😭
20
19.0%
❤🔥
15
14.3%
custom 5265131705869542493
13
12.4%
⚡
12
11.4%
🍓
11
10.5%
💅
5
4.76%
🙏
3
2.86%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"точка, запятая."
мы зовем вас в края лесной тиши, чтобы остановить медленное изнашивание повседневности и раскрыть нашу способность к замедлению и соучастию. без ложной осознанности и попыток исправления себя, а через поиск общности с другими, которая сокрыта в содвижении и созамирании, в лесу, в тишине.
осталось две недели до нашей встречи, смотрите в карточках, что вас ждет!
где и когда: подмосковный лес 1 и 2 …
День молодёжи в Историческом музее пройдет 27 числа!
Да, число не то (может, оно и к лучшему), но в остальном будем на молодёжном вайбе. С 12:00 до 19:00 вас ждут мероприятия на любой вкус: от исторических лекций и археологического паблик-тока до концерта классической музыки и хакатона «Москва в Minecraft». Полная программа — ниже. Билеты продаются со скидкой, но количество мест ограничено — запланируйте визит заран…
Друзья, мы возвращаемся с докладом доктора исторических наук, профессора РГГУ Алексея Алексеевича Киличенкова 18 июня в четверг в 19:00 традиционно в Приговской аудитории 615(3).
"Художественный фильм как "историографический источник": опыт использования произведений кинематографа в курсе истории России ХХ в."
В докладе речь пойдет о возможности использования произведений художественного (игрового) кино в курсе ист…
🤩🤩 Истоки американского религиозного плюрализма: колониальный опыт (или о том, почему в Америке так много церквей и деноминаций) 🤩
06.06.2026 (суббота)
17:00
Зал визуальных искусств РГБМ
🤩🤩Религиозный ландшафт США поражает: сотни деноминаций, независимые мегацеркви и молельные дома на каждом углу. Выясним, как на это повлиял колониальный период, когда Новый Свет стал убежищем для европейских религиозных диссидентов…
‼️ II Конференция «Аудиовизуальный поворот в гуманитарных науках» отменяется ‼️
Друзья, к сожалению, мы вынуждены поделиться непростой новостью: II конференция «Аудиовизуальный поворот» не состоится в запланированные даты.
Нам очень жаль, что приходится отменять событие, к которому многие из вас готовились. Мы приносим искренние извинения каждому, кто планировал участие, подавал заявку или хотел прийти как слушател…
🙂 Ломаете голову подавать ли заявку на нашу мастерскую? Понятно. И не думали подавать к нам заявку? Понятно.
В любом случае, сейчас мы постараемся вас переубедить, что поехать с нами нужно. В карточках мы рассказали, почему Летняя школа — это то место, куда вы должны поехать этим (и следующим) летом.
А если вы хотите поехать на ЛШ с нами, то спешите подать заявку, неделя до дедлайна!
#мит_делает
🤓 Как в XIX веке привлечь внимание читателя к интересующим тебя проблемам? Отвечает журнал «Искра».
XIX век полон событий, которые вызывали волну недовольства и критики власти со стороны населения. Правительство нередко не могло решить острые общественные проблемы, а если и решало (отмена крепостного права), то это вызывало массу недовольств. В таких условиях активно развивалась русская революционная мысль, поскольк…
🍓8custom 52651317058695424936⚡4💅3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @methodsandtexts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 805,814 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Методы и тексты” (@methodsandtexts), 848 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/methodsandtexts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
