Channel
@metel_tg_ads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
94subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001809649590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @metel_tg_ads |
| Description | 🩵Упакую ваш бизнес лучше, чем купер. DIGITAL Стратегия, ваша unique позиция и продвижение в осознанности 💎Привлеку СВОИХ целевых для экспертов и бизнеса 🫂 Выстрою цепочку "смыслы - доверие - продажи" Консалт @olga_metel Кейсы Кhttps://clck.ru/3QnYqv |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/metel_tg_ads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 94 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 94 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 78.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Макс или ТГ, где продвигаться? Или немного моей любимой статистики Ну как вы, определились, что делать с Максом и как его встраивать в свою стратегию (и надо ли вообще, и надо ли выбирать) ? Что делать или оставлять как есть? Ознакомилась совсем недавно со статистическими(ПИАРХАБ) и другими данными от крупнейших и средних представителей бизнеса касательно Телеграм и их коррекции и стратегии, мыслей и планов по п…
❤2
Всем привет, мои хорошие. Благодарю за опрос. Как вижу, план и системный взгляд на развитие в кризисные (лучшие по прокачке,кстати!) времена есть не у всех. Обновила название канала, ибо об этом я говорила всё последнее время: неважно, где ты - важно, кто ты и кто твоя аудитория, а развиваться можно хоть на доске объявлений, хоть на офлайн мероприятиях, хоть в ВК, Максе, оставаясь здесь, хоть на Базаре (новая соцсе…
❤2
Channel name was changed to «Ольга Метель 🌐 осознанный маркетинг TG|Макс|Вк|Threads»
Какие планы развития?
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Весеннее обострение Или куда бежать? Бить или замереть? Сейчас грядут и уже идут интересные времена. Когда нужно делать выбор или оставить все как есть. Чётко понимать свою стратегию развития. Уметь быть гибким и адаптироваться к новым условиям. Но при всем при этом ☀️ Видеть новые возможности для своего роста. Улучшать процессы. Повышать свою компетентность и компетентность «личного состава» команды. И работать н…
❤2
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Психология: Антихрупкость. Гибкость. Проактивный подход. Маркетинг: Личный бренд. Анализ своего бизнеса и аудитории. ⬆️ Самые главные козыри современности ©️ Расскажу в подкасте 🎙 по итогам выбранной вами в опросе темы. О третьем - проактивный подход (он же Гоша один из главных принципов успеха в жизни и в решениях любых «проблем», не говоря уже о печалях по поводу чего бы то ни было) раскрою в своём личном бл…
❤2🔥1
Немного позитива на этой короткой послепраздничной неделе от @radiorecord . Я на полном серьёзе вчера думала, что сегодня понедельник между прочим) Пока из новостей: наполняюсь собираю для вас и для своих клиентов ценнейшую информацию по поводу развития в диджитал маркетинге в ближайшие месяцы и год и что делать с тг и вообще. Кому не терпится, всегда открыты консультации. Доделываю парочку небольших проектов, и о…
❤2
Какой подкаст для вас сейчас более актуален?
Shares as published, totalling 33%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🎙Какой более актуальный для вас сейчас подкаст записать? ↩️Голосуйте, кто живой ещё не ушёл в Макс А послание на моём сегодняшнем кофа очень похоже и на ваших текущих клиентов
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @metel_tg_ads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие планы развития?
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой подкаст для вас сейчас более актуален?
Shares as published, totalling 33%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 28 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@metel_tg_ads named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ольга Метель 🌐 осознанный маркетинг TG|Макс|Вк|Threads” (@metel_tg_ads), 94 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metel_tg_ads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.