Channel
@metavaultprotocol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
845subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003199916044 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @metavaultprotocol |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 12 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/metavaultprotocol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 845 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 846 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 846 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
108 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 12.0% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.70% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.926% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2025 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
MetaVault monitors network fees, liquidity pools, and protocol performance in real-time. This means your funds are always working smarter, not harder. Thanks to automation, analytics, and risk management, MetaVault allows even casual investors to enjoy DeFi returns without manually chasing opportunities. Imagine having a personal DeFi strategist inside your wallet. That’s MetaVault. Engage with this post on our X…
❤20
🚨 META VAULT MEME CONTEST: $50 PRIZE POOL! 🚨 We’re picking 10 winners to receive $5 each for creating the funniest, most accurate MetaVault memes! But before you create anything… You MUST research MetaVault. We want memes that actually understand the project How to Enter: 1. Follow @MetaVaultP 2. Join our Telegram community: t.me/MetaVaultP 3. Research MetaVault 4. Create your meme 5. Post it on Twitter with the…
🔥9❤4⚡1
Most DeFi indices are static. MetaVault’s indices adapt. Every dToken continuously adjusts weights based on: • issuer score changes • liquidity conditions • risk events • new protocol integrations If a protocol’s risk increases, its weight drops automatically. If a safer or more efficient issuer appears, dTokens capture it instantly. Adaptive indices > static indices. This is how modern risk systems should work. …
❤1🔥1
Choosing between 5 versions of the same token isn’t “optional.” It’s a full-time research job. MetaVault converts that complexity into a scored, optimized index: a dToken. You still hold the exposure. You just skip the unpaid labor.
Protocols differ in: how they mint assets how they collateralize how they secure oracles how they manage liquidity MetaVault’s risk model doesn’t treat them equally and neither should you. Weighted exposure = safer exposure. Engage with this post on our X page #MetaVault #Defi
❤2👍2
Many DeFi indices are just curated by teams behind closed doors. MetaVault changes that. Adding or removing an asset from a dToken index requires: • community discussion • $MVP voting • transparent scoring criteria • no backroom decisions The community decides what gets included not a centralized index committee. Engage with this post on our X page #Defi #Metavault
❤1🔥1
In MetaVault, $MVP isn’t a “bonus token.” It’s mandatory collateral for publishing a public Vault. Why? Because strategies should come from people with skin in the game. Good performance → strategist earns fees Poor performance or malicious behavior → staked $MVP gets slashed That’s how you align incentives properly. #MVP #DeFi #MetaVault Engage with this post on our X
❤4👍1
MetaVault’s governance isn’t passive, it’s a feedback loop: More users → more fees More fees → more $MVP buybacks More $MVP staked → stronger rating governance Better governance → higher-quality dTokens Higher-quality dTokens → more users A self-reinforcing system powered by risk-aware community decisions. #MetaVault #Defi Engage with this post on our X
❤3👍1
Most governance tokens simply allow you to vote. However, $MVP lets you govern how assets are rated, weighted, and included in MetaVault’s curated ecosystem. As a holder, you can influence: ⇨ rating parameters ⇨ asset inclusion/removal ⇨ protocol fee structure ⇨ Vault staking requirements ⇨ treasury strategy Governance isn’t cosmetic here. You can shape how the entire curated layer works. #MetaVault #MVP #DeFi En…
❤6🔥1
Still chasing yield? In 2025? MetaVault delivers curated, risk-optimized exposure through dTokens + automated strategy vaults. So you don’t have to chase anything. Your portfolio deserves better. Engage with our post on X #MetaVault #dTokens #DeFi
❤4
While synthetic assets rely on single issuers, dTokens rely on many. So a conclusion can be reached from this: Synthetic assets inherit single-protocol risk. dTokens dilute it. Synthetic assets track price. dTokens track risk-adjusted exposure. If DeFi evolves into real infrastructure, dTokens will be the standard. Engage with this post on our X page: https://x.com/metavaultp/status/1992165411421348055?s=20 #De…
❤4
MetaVault is a curated ecosystem of rated assets and automated strategies. The the fuel that'll back this up is $MVP What $MVP Does: • Enables Vault Creation: strategists must stake $MVP to publish strategies. • Aligns Incentives: good vaults earn; unsafe vaults get slashed. • Governs the Protocol: holders shape ratings, asset inclusion, and system rules. • Captures Value: a share of protocol fees flows back into t…
❤5👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @metavaultprotocol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 956,487 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Metavault Protocol Official” (@metavaultprotocol), 845 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metavaultprotocol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.