Channel
@metamodell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
105subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003484725845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @metamodell |
| Description | Официальная группа YouTube-канала "Метамодель": https://www.youtube.com/@metamodell?sub_confirmation=1 |
| Created | 1 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/metamodell |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 105 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 105 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (1 December 2025 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 343 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
33 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15 | 45.5% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 30.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 15.2% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пока Леопольд делил галактики, Citadel забрал его портфель «Не разориться — задача номер один и номер два», — говорил Леопольд Ашенбреннер в 2024 году. В этом месяце его хедж-фонд потерял 67%. Из-за маржин-коллов пришлось продать Citadel почти весь биржевой портфель. Сам фонд уцелел: остались частные активы, включая долю в Anthropic — хотя и она под вопросом. Но операция по захвату будущего споткнулась о прозу жизн…
Шутки матрицы
😁3❤2
Сохранится ли свободный интернет?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Свободный интернет был их ошибкой. Ее исправляют Мы привыкли думать, что интернет должен быть свободным. Это казалось чем-то естественным и почти незыблемым. Но что, если свободный интернет был не нормой, а исторической аномалией? https://youtu.be/fdJ0ujufhbw
🔥4❤1
Объясняем искусственный интеллект за 30 минут: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3NXZdTnYYk
👍3❤1
О чем сделать ближайшие видео?
The shares total 192%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Илон Маск — триллионер В наших видео мы часто делаем прогнозы о будущем. И вот один из них подтвердился: Илон Маск стал триллионером на бумаге — или, по более осторожным оценкам, подошел к этому статусу вплотную. Это произошло благодаря IPO SpaceX и слиянию компании с xAI. Прогноз мы дали три месяца назад в ролике про андроидов. На тот момент IPO SpaceX еще оставалось на уровне слухов. Теперь же SpaceX вышла на би…
🔥2
Как не сбивают самолеты Вторая Иранская война началась 28 февраля 2026 года. Американские дроны начали сбивать сразу, но дрон — это легкая мишень и расходный материал. Первые потери в пилотируемой авиации от огня иранского ПВО у США появились только через месяц, в начале апреля. Иран сбил истребитель F-15E, штурмовик А-10 и повредил истребитель F-35. Остальные потери в пилотируемой авиации США понесли из-за аварий, …
👍2
От спутника до смартфона: что техническая разведка может на самом деле? Как США удается так легко похищать президентов и бомбить другие страны с такими малыми потерями? Такие операции, как похищение Мадуро и молниеносное обезглавливание Ирана, стали возможны благодаря прогрессу в технической разведке. Армия с сильной разведкой теперь иногда знает о противнике больше, чем он сам знает о себе. https://www.youtube.co…
👍5🔥1
Андроиды: когда они захватят всё? Человекообразные роботы десятилетиями обитали только в фантастике. Сегодня они становятся реальностью. Но почему только сейчас? Почему нужны именно гуманоиды? Как они устроены и сколько будут стоить? Отберут ли они у нас работу, мотивацию жить, а может и саму жизнь? Приведут ли они к росту одиночества и краху семьи? Как они изменят политику и весь мир? https://youtu.be/qZZ76BE1__I
🔥4❤1
Убьет на ли нас ИИ? Кто и зачем разгоняет искусственный страх об искусственном интеллекте В последние пару лет регулярно выходят новости о том, что еще немного — и в мире появится настоящий «Скайнет». Якобы нейросети уже демонстрируют опасное поведение, обманывают людей и даже готовы нас убивать. Пресса и блогеры не погружаются в этот вопрос глубоко, а читатели, как правило, и смотрят дальше заголовка. А погрузиться…
🔥2
Какими будут войны будущего. Технологии завтрашнего дня Следующую мировую войну не объявят — ее дату историки назначат задним числом. Возможно, она уже идет. Война всегда ускоряла развитие технологий. Это видео — о том, какими будут военные технологии в следующие 10-15 лет. Мы рассмотрим дроны, искусственный интеллект, космос, бронетехнику, артиллерию, авиацию, флот, роботы, нейрочипы, а также изменения в тактике и…
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @metamodell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сохранится ли свободный интернет?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
О чем сделать ближайшие видео?
The shares total 192%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 368,511 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Метамодель” (@metamodell), 105 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metamodell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.