Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Игорь Варнавский

@ah_freeman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

387subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002228386495
TypeChannel
Username@ah_freeman
Descriptionhttps://www.youtube.com/@metamodell https://kritikanstvo.ru/critics/577/ https://www.igromania.ru/authors/169/
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ah_freeman

Growth

3877 Aug 2026, 18:26 — 387 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:03 — 387 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:268 Aug 2026, 06:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 386–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:03387no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:26387first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.9%
avg views ÷ 387 subscribers
Avg views / post
213
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (1 March 202631 July 2026)
Views total425
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
25
Videos
1
Links
89

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

196 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5930.1%
3919.9%
🔥2814.3%
🤡168.16%
👏126.12%
💯126.12%
🥰105.10%
🎉52.55%
😁42.04%
🏆21.02%
😱21.02%
🤔21.02%
🤨21.02%
👎10.51%
🤣10.51%
🤯10.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC127 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @metamodell

Пока Леопольд делил галактики, Citadel забрал его портфель «Не разориться — задача номер один и номер два», — говорил Леопольд Ашенбреннер в 2024 году. В этом месяце его хедж-фонд потерял 67%. Из-за маржин-коллов пришлось продать Citadel почти весь биржевой портфель. Сам фонд уцелел: остались частные активы, включая долю в Anthropic — хотя и она под вопросом. Но операция по захвату будущего споткнулась о прозу жизн

🤡2🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC298 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Война уходит за горизонт Fun Dog снова бьют под дых роликом Forever Winter. Это не просто дальний культурный потомок рассказа «Будет ласковый дождь», а правдоподобный образ дальнейшей эволюции войны. Дроны сделали современное поле боя прозрачным и почти убили маневр. Для прорыва нужно сосредоточить силы, но любое скопление людей и техники быстро обнаруживается и поражается. Наступать можно — но дорого, трудно и ме

👍6💯1🔥1🤡1

10 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC373 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @metamodellPhoto

Свободный интернет был их ошибкой. Ее исправляют Мы привыкли думать, что интернет должен быть свободным. Это казалось чем-то естественным и почти незыблемым. Но что, если свободный интернет был не нормой, а исторической аномалией? https://youtu.be/fdJ0ujufhbw

🤨2👍1🤡1

10 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC350 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Они считают свободный интернет багом. И чинят его Когда-то проблемой были региональные ограничения платформ. 20 лет назад я писал об этом колонки. Какое спокойное и беззаботное было время. С тех пор многое изменилось. Когда они пришли за торрент-трекерами, люди освоили «луковый браузер». Когда пришли за Telegram, стали массово использовать прокси. Когда пришли за соцсетями и всем остальным интернетом, VPN научил

👍6👏2

7 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC365 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ИИ за 30 минут Мы не знаем, как будет работать мозг у будущих Диан и тачиком. Но их предки уже существуют. Пока без милого лица, тонкого детского голоса, доверчивых глаз и способности стесняться аугментированного шкафа-оперативника и холодного майора-киборга. В новом ролике рассказываем, как современные ИИ работают сейчас.

👍6💯2🤡1😁1

7 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC369 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @metamodellPhoto

Объясняем искусственный интеллект за 30 минут: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3NXZdTnYYk

🔥6👍2🤔2🤡1

5 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC527 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ИИ, который жалко выключить В произведениях об ИИ часто бывает такая сцена: машина стала слишком умной, ее пытаются выключить, а машина сопротивляется. Но возможен иной вариант: ИИ не сопротивляется, а просто смотрит на тебя жалостливыми глазами. Дарио Амодеи долго убеждал всех в опасности искусственного интеллекта как кибероружия и не только. И это сработало: правительство США само начало относиться к новым модел

7👍5💯4😱2🤡1

21 Jun 2026, 10:53 UTC454 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Зачем нужен Xbox? Нового босса Xbox Ашу Шарму встретили с подозрением: женщина-корп без игрового опыта полезла в преимущественно мужскую тему — сейчас будет курочить святое. Но ее первые шаги вызывают осторожный оптимизм. Вот она рассказывает Эмили Чанг о причинах отказа от Copilot. Чтобы принять такое решение, нужна смелость. Xbox родился из неоправданного страха, что PlayStation 2 станет главным домашним устройс

6🏆2👍2🤡1🤯1😁1

14 Jun 2026, 10:36 UTC492 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Metal Gear Solid: Sons of Mars Многие авторы всю жизнь создают одно и то же произведение. Кен Левин снова и снова делает игры про утопии, которые становятся клетками. Уоррен Спектор — игры о системах, выборе и последствиях. Патрис Дезиле — игры о памяти, происхождении и исторической цепи. Valve — игры про мир как лабораторию, а человек в ней — герой, аномалия и подопытный. Сэм Лейк — игры о реальности как о тек

👍111🤡1

12 Jun 2026, 16:49 UTC443 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В мире, где можно все, главным станет запрет Страх нашего времени: нейросети убьют игры. Наиболее вероятный сценарий: нейросети убьют не игры, а игровые коридоры. Первые текстовые ролевые игры появились в 70-е. Это были первые попытки сделать миры, которые отвечали бы игроку. Грубо, через текст, но хотя бы так. Современные LLM удивительно похожи на эту стадию. Сейчас они тоже чаще всего выглядят как текстовое окн

9👍2🤡1

7 Jun 2026, 09:46 UTC468 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как не сбивают самолеты Новый Ace Combat 8: Wings of Theve снова улетел в родную для серии вымышленную вселенную. Мне всегда нравились аркадные авиасимы, но когда я слышу про конфликты между Федерацией Центральной Усеи, Сотой, Устио и Белкой, у меня от такой ахинеи стекленеют глаза и пропадает всякий интерес. В Ace Combat: Assault Horizon авторы набрались храбрости и показали реальный мир. Я прошел ее от корки до

👍2🔥1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ah_freeman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,014,948 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Игорь Варнавский” (@ah_freeman), 387 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ah_freeman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.