Channel
@meta_vr
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001422824040 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meta_vr |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meta_vr |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @meta_oculus | 20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (15–5) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 18 November 2021 to 22 June 2022. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @addmeta. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:10 | 4 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Nvidia, Meta, Epic Games, Unity, Microsoft, W3C — это список компаний, образовавших новый форум стандартов для метавселенных Metaverse Standards Forum. Задача форума — решать проблемы интероперабильности разных метаверсов, её считают ключевой для будущего виртуальных миров. Довольно разумный шаг, большое будущее веба тоже началось с образования W3C. https://thenewstack.io/metaverse-standards-forum/
И новости во время войны одной строкой: в последнем обновлении oculus quest пропал фирменный логотип в виде продольной буквы O. Теперь вместо него показывается лого Meta.
Самое важное из регулярного звонка Meta Platforms - очень красивая цифра: оборот Quest Store, магазина приложений и VR-контента для шлемов Oculus Quest составил более 1 миллиарда долларов. Всё подразделение Reality Labs заработали $2.3 миллиарда за 2021, это в 2 раза больше чем в прошлом году. На самом деле рост всего в два раза - это плохой знак, потому что при росте почти с нуля можно было вырасти существенно быст…
В FT отличный мета-анализ (всмысле анализ Меты) патентов, в том числе направленных на монетизацию метаверса. Крупными мазками: в метаверсе будет реклама на основе собранных по аватару данных (а собирается всё), виртуальные магазины с виртуальными и реальными товарами (спонсируемыми брендами), куча всего рассчитана на отслеживание выражения лица и направление взгляда (чего нет в нынешних шлемах от Меты) и многое друго…
Слухи: Meta полностью остановили разработку своей собственной OS для VR/AR устройств. На проекте работало несколько сотен человек, без каких-либо приличных результатов на протяжении последних 4 лет. Если вы не в курсе, операционная система в нынешних Oculus построена на базе открытой части Android https://www.theinformation.com/articles/meta-platforms-halts-vr-and-ar-operating-system-project
Nvidia так же обьявили о выходе из беты платформы Omniverse. Это такая платформа для создания виртуальных сцен (ну, считайте что миров) с проработаной физикой и инструментами коллаборации и создания новых обьектов. Разумеется для работы платформы требуется видеокарта от Nvidia. Есть такая штука “самосбывающееся пророчество. Это когда пророчество исполняется просто из-за того, что люди в него верят. Так вот, кажется …
Goertek, китайский производитель VR-гарнитур, помогающий Meta с компонентами для Oculus Quest 2, получил контракт на поставку 1-2 млн новых шлемов от некоего японского заказчика. В сети полагают, что этим заказчиком является Sony, а новый шлем, соответственно, PSVR 2. А ещё Goertek, похоже, будет поставлять компоненты для шлемов от Apple, но это не точно. https://gamerant.com/playstation-vr-2-production-when/
Состоялся анонс первых в мире перчаток с обратной тактильной связью TactGlove — стоить они будут 299$, а продажи начнутся в 4 квартале 2022 года. Совместить можно будет со шлемами Holosens и Meta Quest. Разрабы говорят, что трекинг рук тоже будет. Выглядит все очень футуристично.
Meta на прошлой неделе открыли в США доступ к Horizon Worlds, и он крутой, но пишу я не об этом. Судя по всему уже во время бетатестирования, еще 26 ноября, в этом новом мета-мире произошел случай домогательств к женщине. Т.е. мир новый, а проблемы старые. Такие проблемы всегда были во всех VR мирах, но в Horizon есть хорошая дополнительная функция, Safe Zone - ты нажимаешь кнопку и тебя помещает в особый пузырь, гд…
Начинается ... 😂 Тестировщица Meta пожаловалась на «сексуальные домогательства» в метавселенной Horizon Worlds. Девушка рассказала, что её аватар «облапали без её согласия» в виртуальной реальности. Компания провела внутреннее расследование: вскоре операторы новой соцсети заявили, что девушка должна была воспользоваться инструментом «Безопасная зона». Это защитный купол, который сделает присутствие в Horizon Worlds …
Некоторые новости звучат очень парадоксально: Meta купили права у Meta чтобы называть себя Meta. Т.е. создатели Facebook купили набор торговых марок Meta Financial Group, чтобы называться Meta, сумма сделки составила около $60m. На моей памяти это одна из самых дорогих торговых марок в IT. Ну и отдельно забавно наверное, когда такая простая торговая марка стоит больше чем иная компания целиком. https://www.reuters.c…
Meta/Facebook запустила приложение с аватарами виртуальной реальности Приложение Horizon Worlds было в тесте среди пользователей Oculus VR, а теперь стало доступно пользователям старше 18 лет в США и Канаде. В нем можно создать аватар (почему-то без ног!), и он будет перемещаться в анимированной вселенной, общаться с другими аватарами и играть в игры. Horizon Worlds — один из первых шагов к метавселенной, концепцию…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @meta_vr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Meta” (@meta_vr), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meta_vr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.