Channel
@messaggioinbottiglia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
111subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001169301249 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @messaggioinbottiglia |
| Created | 10 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/messaggioinbottiglia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 111 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 111 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 231 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Oh! I danesi iniziano l'arruolamento per fronteggiare la minaccia.. russo-americana. Ancora una volta l'impossibile diventa possibile ed ancora una volta.... Ho ragione. Federico Dezzani ha sempre ragione.
https://youtu.be/oC4043GZfXw?is=tq4hsWoW00TxjIqn
Gli USA cominciano a far circolare strane versioni su quel che accade in Spagna. Qui parla Rubin, ex funzionario del Pentagono, da sempre centrato sul “dossier Iran”, ora direttore di un centro studi sul Medio Oriente. Al di là delle valutazioni politiche, criticabili ma, appunto, politiche è straordinariamente sospetto che chiami “territori occupati” quelli che sono a tutti gli effetti territori spagnoli d’oltrema…
Il gruppo di Repubblica (ora in mano ai greci filo-israeliani) sostiene che Russia e Iran stanno con la Cina. Io sostengo che stanno con gli USA e Israele. Qualcuno sta commettendo un clamoroso errore o raccontando una vera menzogna. Chi vivrà, vedrà.
Una palestra dei movimenti anarchici, legati a servizi segreti vari. Il ponte di Messina non è mai partito, il tunnel del Moncenisio è partito ma è ostacolato in ogni modo. Del resto, l'intero apparato burocratico e di polizia attorno alla Tav é costruito proprio per ritardare il più possibile i lavori. Verità che nessun giornale dirà mai
Americani e iraniani stanno seguendo la stessa strategia di Churchill e Roosevelt nel 1941. Bloccare tutti gli accessi degli europei al Golfo.
In passato hanno già visto giusto. Possibile che Putin voglia aprire un fronte Nato (Baltici o Polonia o Finlandia) per dimostrare che la Nato è morta. O meglio, che gli USA sono usciti
Dopo l'arresto per truffa, le possibilità del catto-conservatore-israeliano Adinolfi di entrare nel governo sono
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
La feccia americana e quella iraniana sono identiche. Dicono e fanno le stesse cose. Alleati dal 1979 e fino alla sconfitta finale.
🇷🇺🛢🚫 — RIA Novosti says that a complete ban on the export of diesel fuel has been introduced in Russia, Novak announced at a meeting between Putin and the government. This month, Russia will start importing fuel from other countries, he added. https://t.me/rian_ru/341820 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 💧 Rainbet.com the #1 Non-KYC Crypto Casino & Sportsbook @rainbetcom ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @BellumActaNews
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116869343915433662
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @messaggioinbottiglia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Dopo l'arresto per truffa, le possibilità del catto-conservatore-israeliano Adinolfi di entrare nel governo sono
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Messaggio in bottiglia” (@messaggioinbottiglia), 111 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/messaggioinbottiglia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.