Кто помнит? 🤍
❤2👍1🙏1

Channel
@message_to_the_future
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,050subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001510696409 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @message_to_the_future |
| Description | «Послание в будущее» — это приложение, в котором вы можете записать видеосообщение или интервью для себя или близких и выбрать дату и время активации послания. Скажи важное сегодня — и дай этому прозвучать тогда, когда это действительно нужно. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/message_to_the_future |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 1,050 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 1,050 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
139 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 32.4% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 17.3% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 15.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 15.1% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 7.91% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 7.19% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.44% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.44% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.719% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.719% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кто помнит? 🤍
❤2👍1🙏1
О том, кто стоит за каждым из нас Чтобы появился ты, потребовалось участие: 2 родителей 4 бабушек и дедушек 8 прабабушек и прадедушек 16 предков четвёртого колена 32 — пятого 64 — шестого 128 — седьмого 256 — восьмого 512 — девятого 1024 — десятого 2048 — одиннадцатого Всего — 4094 человека за последние 400 лет. Ты — не просто один человек. Ты — продолжение тысяч историй. Выборов. Судеб. Встреч. Того, что удалос…
❤3👍2🙏1
Загадка истории рейса 513 😨 Самолёт, провалившийся во времени на 35 лет Подробнее на видео 👆
❤3❤🔥2🔥2👍1
О том, что мы не всегда замечаем Иногда в знакомых с детства вещах скрыто больше, чем кажется. Например, иллюстрации к сказке «Репка», опубликованные в XIX веке. Если присмотреться — там можно увидеть детали, которые выбиваются из привычного восприятия. Как будто в этих образах зафиксировано что-то большее, чем просто сказка. Мы привыкли воспринимать подобные вещи как вымысел, фольклор, фантазию. Но интересно др…
👍2❤1👏1💯1
Небольшая карикатура из старого советского журнала за 1988 год. Уже тогда понимали проблему переписывания истории.
🙏3❤1💯1🔥1
О том, что остаётся 🤍 Иногда самое важное скрыто в деталях, которые невозможно увидеть с первого взгляда. В глазах Богоматери Гваделупской, размером всего в несколько миллиметров, обнаружили отражения людей — сцену, застывшую во времени. Мгновение, которое не исчезло. Оно просто стало частью чего-то большего. И в этом есть правда: каждый наш взгляд, каждое сказанное слово, каждое состояние — оставляет след. В д…
❤2🔥2🥰1🙏1
У весны странное чувство юмора, но мы не отчаиваемся и двигаемся только вперед 🤍
❤🔥3👍2🔥2
Доброй ночи всем нам ☺️✨
🔥5❤🔥4❤2👍1
Замечаете, как время летит все быстрее с каждым годом? Это не просто ощущение. Посмотрите на эти кадры сравнения времени на примере нашей планеты с 2012 по 2025 год, чтобы убедиться в этом. Интересно, что некоторые теории от уфологов связывают это ускорение с разрывом реальности или "сдвигом временной шкалы", произошедшим примерно в 2018 году. 🕰️Более того, если опираться на старое, неизменное время, то современные…
❤3❤🔥2🔥1🥰1
🕰️ Всё приходит в своё время. Иногда кажется, что ты отстаёшь. Что у других уже получается, а ты всё ещё ищешь, пробуешь, сомневаешься. И в такие моменты легко начать сравнивать. Смотреть по сторонам и думать: «А со мной всё нормально?» ✨ Но правда в том, что у каждого свой ритм. Своя точка старта. Свои повороты. Кто-то быстро находит путь. Кто-то долго идёт через ошибки. Кто-то меняет всё в самый неожиданный мом…
❤3❤🔥3🔥2👍1
Настоящая дружба, пройденная сквозь года, выглядит именно так🤍
❤5🥰2👍1🔥1
😁😆😁 напомнить подписчикам, что жизнь прекрасна 🤍
❤🔥3❤1🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @message_to_the_future. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А какой способ(-ы) оставить о себе память нравится вам?
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 23 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Послание в будущее” (@message_to_the_future), 1,050 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/message_to_the_future.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.