📱lildzharakhov
Signed Mars

Channel
@meri_Liga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
256subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002186432291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meri_Liga |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meri_Liga |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 256 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 259 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 261 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 268 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 267 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 265 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
67 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5463202635349781238 | 54 | 80.6% | |
| custom 5465371903071906410 | 10 | 14.9% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 4.48% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📱lildzharakhov
Signed Mars
📱klavacoca
custom 54653719030719064103
Signed Mars
📱klavacoca
custom 54653719030719064105
Signed Mars
📱samoylovaoxana #inst #reels
custom 54632026353497812383
📱lizarainbow19 #reels
custom 54632026353497812383
Signed Mars
📱hello_ru #inst #фото
custom 54632026353497812386custom 54653719030719064101
Что нашел в архиве @dima_maslen 😂 @nikushkarus @stoliarovaleksey @didenok 📱rafkat #inst #reels #архив
custom 54632026353497812386
📱markrudak #TikTok
custom 54632026353497812386
📱karinakross #stories #inst
custom 54632026353497812383
Я всё понимаю, но зачем публиковать материал по частям каждый день? Лучше сначала собрать всё вместе, а потом выложить полноценное видео.😬 Рада за ребят. Желаю им счастья🤍
custom 54632026353497812382
Не верим, что всё это произошло!! Лучший день в нашей жизни!!! 🎂 Всё пронеслось как вспышка, как самый яркий сон! Хотя шли мы к этому очень долго: месяцы подготовки, тысячи деталей и команда, которая смогла воплотить всё, что мы задумали, и даже больше! Любимые, @bigbird.events !!!!! Вы создали не просто свадьбу. Вы создали воспоминание на всю жизнь. Спасибо за каждую деталь, каждую эмоцию и за то, что в этот день …
custom 54632026353497812385custom 54653719030719064101
📱daniladi777 #stories
custom 54632026353497812385👻3
Signed Mars
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @meri_Liga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@meri_Liga named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Meri” (@meri_Liga), 256 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meri_Liga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.