с апреля рисовала …………. ну ниче, мону лизу тоже 16 лет писали
💘8🕊1custom 53325447738132142871custom 53593760658715156311

Channel
@merccredi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002745259234 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @merccredi |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/merccredi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 93 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 93 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (12 February 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,182 |
| Reactions total | 128 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
735 reactions across 16 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5359320128217457522 | 87 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5352715731236592609 | 82 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5377580362065025952 | 66 | 8.98% | |
| custom 5190618945316487040 | 65 | 8.84% | |
| custom 5190915899355334623 | 63 | 8.57% | |
| custom 5377777209006139670 | 57 | 7.76% | |
| custom 5429353736097011627 | 57 | 7.76% | |
| custom 5359376065871515631 | 38 | 5.17% | |
| 💘 | 33 | 4.49% | |
| custom 5456487131859950274 | 28 | 3.81% | |
| custom 5332544773813214287 | 27 | 3.67% | |
| custom 5375355242588184070 | 27 | 3.67% | |
| custom 5192760377355566150 | 26 | 3.54% | |
| custom 5226664428283383903 | 20 | 2.72% | |
| custom 5443110971612608064 | 20 | 2.72% | |
| custom 5193006109614440437 | 13 | 1.77% | |
| custom 5190819520289210046 | 11 | 1.50% | |
| custom 5192819613544510037 | 8 | 1.09% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.952% |
Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 735reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @merccredi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 February 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
с апреля рисовала …………. ну ниче, мону лизу тоже 16 лет писали
💘8🕊1custom 53325447738132142871custom 53593760658715156311
пересмешники когда моггают весь каст зенлесса
custom 535937606587151563120💘16custom 533254477381321428711🕊1custom 53753552425881840701
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 537535524258818407018💘7custom 53325447738132142877🕊3custom 53593760658715156311
вот влад м6р2 уже на подходе odetari — I peep art cr (twt) smyecc, mksrw #edit
custom 535937606587151563114custom 53325447738132142878custom 53753552425881840708💘1🕊1
майонез #art
custom 535932012821745752234custom 537758036206502595220custom 537777720900613967015custom 53593760658715156312💘1🕊1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 535932012821745752222custom 53775803620650259527custom 53777772090061396706
let me explain — bryson tiller art cr (twt) : Apoool___, Aoma_xzxx, co6_3g sdt дуралина #edit
custom 537758036206502595226custom 535932012821745752217custom 537777720900613967014
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 537777720900613967022custom 535932012821745752214custom 537758036206502595213
плохой из меня эстет — хотела под каждый пост делать тематические реакты, Но я об этом забыла .
custom 519276037735556615014custom 54293537360970116278custom 54431109716126080647custom 54564871318599502741
хуго босс и смартфон виво
custom 542935373609701162726custom 545648713185995027413custom 519276037735556615012custom 54431109716126080641
коммишко для фуси !! 🌟 #art
custom 542935373609701162723custom 545648713185995027414custom 544311097161260806412
девочки скетчевые
custom 519091589935533462319custom 51928196135445100377custom 51906189453164870405custom 51930061096144404371custom 53527157312365926091
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @merccredi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 606,851 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mercredi” (@merccredi), 93 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/merccredi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.