Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mercado Azul

@mercadoazul

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

859subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002476117136
TypeChannel
Username@mercadoazul
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mercadoazul

Growth

859862860.57 August 2026 — 862 subscribers8 August 2026 — 862 subscribers15 August 2026 — 859 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 859–862 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:45859-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:17862no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:13862first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.4%
avg views ÷ 859 subscribers
Avg views / post
321
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,426
Reactions total229
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

229 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9441.0%
6528.4%
👏177.42%
🙏114.80%
👎93.93%
🔥83.49%
😨83.49%
🤔73.06%
💯41.75%
🤨20.873%
🥰20.873%
👌10.437%
😢10.437%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC157 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://mercadoazul.pt/news/e-agora-tottenham-muda-de-ideias-e-quer-apostar-em-souza

👎7

7 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC197 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Conforme revela hoje A Bola, Froholdt não está interessado na saída para o Newcastle. Médio almeja voos maiores e olha para a estreia na Champions como o palco certo para se mostrar.

👍93🥰2

6 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC238 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://mercadoazul.pt/news/fc-porto-rejeita-joselu-oferta

👍41

6 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC237 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Newcastle aprecia bastante Victor Froholdt, mas as exigências portistas devem afastar qualquer possibilidade de acordo, revela @TheAthleticFC. Clube inglês deve seguir outros alvos.

👍83👌1

5 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC331 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Olympiakos é um dos clubes interessados em Francisco Moura, revela @sebsousapinto.

👍93🙏3

4 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC306 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Chelsea não está a planear avançar por Diogo Costa, avança @TheAthleticFC.

👍94

4 Aug 2026, 01:59 UTC338 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Saída de Rodrigo Mora está em cima da mesa até ao fecho do mercado. Jogador tem pouco espaço com Farioli e não teve sequer minutos na Supertaça.

🙏8👍52😢1

3 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC383 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://mercadoazul.pt/news/santiago-gimenez-quer-o-dragao-mexicano-ja-falou-com-farioli

4👍3

3 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC348 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Santi Gimenez foi colega de equipa de Eustáquio e está bem atento ao FC Porto

👍104

3 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC319 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Newcastle tem Victor Froholdt na sua shortlist, mas ainda não decidiu qual será o alvo primordial para substituir Bruno Guimarães. FC Porto só vende pela cláusula (85M€).

7👍2

2 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC331 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

O mercado está a entrar na fase decisiva e o Mercado Azul é o sítio certo para acompanharem. Estamos em todas as plataformas. 😎 🔗 https://mercadoazul.pt/lancamento

👍21

2 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC296 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨🚨 Bednarek tem um estiramento no joelho e está fora da primeira jornada, sendo muito provável que irá perder mais encontros.

😨83🤨2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mercadoazul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mercado Azul” (@mercadoazul), 859 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mercadoazul.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.