Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

кошачьи записи.

@meowsnotesx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003927950221
TypeChannel
Username@meowsnotesx
Created29 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/meowsnotesx

Growth

232423.512 Aug 2026, 18:18 — 23 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 18:30 — 23 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 16:06 — 24 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 18:1813 Aug 2026, 16:06
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:0624+1
12 Aug 2026, 18:3023no change
12 Aug 2026, 18:1823first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
351.7%
avg views ÷ 24 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.4
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held11 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total844
Reactions total107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8579.4%
💔2220.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 10 we hold a reading for · 70%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @meowsnotesx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC13 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

я не в себе. дверь на замке, взгляд на стене, из колонок орет, и я не в себе. просыпаюсь в обед, с колокольней в бошке, на завтрак омлет, и я не в себе. голода нет, но кофе в обед, сна ни в глазу, и я не могу. работать нет сил, вдохновения ноль, все говорят, что это пройдет. но я же лежу, с тишиной в голове, а из колонок орет, и я не в себе.

6

10 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC19 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

потерянное(?) в том дневнике были все мои воспоминания: письма людей, которых я встречал всего раз в жизни. кривые зарисовки, вдохновленные книгой. мои первые попытки написания мелодий. стихи о любви, сочиненные со страстью в глазах. ночные черновики, которые тяжело было бы читать с утра. и предсмертная записка, криво начирканная в тяжелые годы. все это осталось и останется в том неряшливом дневнике.

8💔1

31 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC117 views14 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

вдохновение. хандра подкралась незаметно, оцепенел и вздрогнул я. но это было лишь мгновенье, и погрузился в небытия. апатией кличать не стану, да и "депрессия" не то. ведь я тогда писать не стал бы, все эти строчки на ходу. вы скажете, "ну что за нытик", и я в ответ вам лишь кивну. ведь я согласен, что не стоит, тут душу изливать свою. но раз я начал это дело, позвольте попрощаться с ним. как надобно бы это сдел

9💔5

30 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC95 views8 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

ты совсем другой. [куплет 1] за руку тебя держать и не отпускать, я думал, что это легко. но как показали силы, нам это не по силу. давай уже просто летать. [припев] мы, же были так вместе дружны, я, пытался тебя удержать, но, ты оборвал пути. ты, точно другой теперь, я, буду бежать от тебя, вдоль, темных дорог. [куплет 2] как же хочу летать, просто с тобой летать, тебе этого не понять. ты же совсем другой, а я

8

29 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC95 views13 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

хочу. хочу жить в твоей голове, но боюсь убить тебя нечаянно. хочу читать тебя как книгу, но боюсь не понять скрытого смысла. хочу рисовать твои глаза и руки, но только я не художник. хочу быть для тебя единственным, но я не тот, кто тебе нужен.

9💔4

29 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC125 views13 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

страх разговаривать. так страшно начинать разговаривать с людьми. страх, что меня не поймут, что меня обвинят и не дослушают, пожирает меня. как тяжело разобраться в словах, которые стоит говорить, и которые лучше удержать в себе. тяжело промолчать, когда требуется, и высказаться, когда это необходимо. постоянно задаюсь множеством вопросов на данную тему: а как подобрать тон и слова для каждого человека? все люди р

9💔4

29 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC104 views14 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

где ты? я не знаю как мне быть, куда деваться. все что надо это ты, и твое счастье. может быть мне повезет, и может скоро ты заметишь, что я здесь, с тобою. я не знаю где ты есть, и где ты бродишь. но надеюсь ты найдешь ко мне дорогу. мы не виделись с тобой довольно долго. я скучаю по тебе.., совсем немного. я надеюсь ты полюбишь меня снова. не забудешь как мы встретились с тобою. будешь это вспоминать и улыбаться

10💔4

29 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTC96 views12 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

а помнишь? а помнишь, как мы гуляли вдоль чужих гаражей, прыгали по ним, и падали, поднимались и шагали дальше. я припоминаю, как на нас кричали и мы убегали быстро, и понимаю, что стереть я эти кадры не сумею. или даже взять, допустим, любой из тех отважных дней, когда мы не боялись показать себя, и с криками ныряли в бездну. чтобы показать кто лидер, показать что главный я! и вести компанию за приключениям по мес

9💔3

29 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC77 views10 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

почему люди не могут как птицы? за окном уже осень, птицы вьют себе гнезда. по двору стаей летают, поют, так дружно, свободно и весело может. они так любимы, в своем же народе. свободны и счастливы, не зная проблем. почему люди, не птицы? почему закрыты в себе? почему люди не могут как птицы, жить свободно и дружно в семье? люди закрыты в себе, погружены в манящую мглу. их тьма затащила, глубоко в темноту. эх, л

9💔1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @meowsnotesx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,083,746 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кошачьи записи.” (@meowsnotesx), 24 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meowsnotesx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.