The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If it remains inactive in the next 18 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.

Channel
+
@meownsterr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001284848602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meownsterr |
| Created | 14 July 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meownsterr |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 9 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 10 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 11 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 11 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 14 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
gwe blm ada duit buat ngerombak nya
apsh sbr y
akan w rombak
ini ch buat ap y
IM READY FOR VOGOS GANK EVENT
People come and go, some people break our heart and someone try to mend it. No matter how strong we are at certain point we need someone. At lowest point of life when everything starts to feel heavy inside, we need someone. You know when people get tested? When we have nothing to give and still they refused to leave us. Never forget that person who was there when you needed someone, when that void inside your heart w…
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤLee Dong-hyuck (이동혁) known by his stage name 𝙃𝙖𝙚𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣 (해찬) is a 𝐒𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝐊𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗻 singer and dancer who was b𖦹rn in Seoul on June 6, 2000. ㅤ ✮◞ 𝐓he man who is familiarly called 𝕱ull 𝕾un or 𝐃ongsookie had studied at the School of Performing Arts Seoul with the Department of Practical Music. His nickname as '𝘿𝙤𝙣𝙜𝙨𝙤𝙤𝙠𝙞𝙚' was coined for the 'girl versi✪n' of himself, Haechan also dressed up as a girl for the roleplay par…
۫◞ 💣 𝐄ach one of the case was 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 out 🅰𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁, like a 𝐜𝐲𝐛𝐞𝐫 who own erect 𝖉𝖊𝖋𝖊𝖓𝖘𝖊 all above the 𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘮𝘺. ★✩ way to guilds hold up the 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝘁 on above 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭, made 𝖈𝖆𝖑𝖑'𝖎𝖓 like “ oh.. an howdy that ur gonna get mislay ” that case might be get 𝗱𝗿𝘂𝗻𝗸𝗲𝗱, on 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 that I'll 𝖔𝖈𝖈𝖆𝖘𝖎𝖔𝖓 you on 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 crash that I've 𝙣✪𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙮 you❕˖˚ ✦ ː 𝐆et hold the time 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗹✪𝗮𝗱 , Rezvan Aderald Abimandra who had an 𝖊𝖖𝖚𝖎𝖛𝖆𝖑𝖊𝖓𝖙…
𝕳𝗲𝗟𝗟𝗼 rpw people 💀 🄸🄽𝗧𝗿𝗢𝗱𝘂𝗖𝗲 me Rezvan, using 𝕷𝐞𝐞 𝕯𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐡𝐲𝐮𝐜𝐤 as face claim, i want to tell a little bit about Lee Donghyuck 😮💨💥. Born June 6, 2000, known by his stage name 𝕳𝐚𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧, he is a member of the 🆂︎𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵 🅚︎𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗻 🇰🇷 boy band, 🅝︎Ⓒ︎🅣︎ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ・・ ──────── ・・ ✦ ★ . I'm Ⓝ︎Ⓞ︎Ⓣ︎ the real 𝕷𝐞𝐞 𝕯𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐡𝐲𝐮𝐜𝐤, this channel is made for 🆁︎🄾🄻🄴🄿🄻🄰🅈 purposes only. And all media photos, videos and others come from 𝗜𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺, 𝗧𝘄𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿, …
[] selamat bertambah umur Epan 🥁🥁
Wdyt about me?
- Friendly and very nice, social butterfly, and very easy to talk to, very gentle. Let's get closer.76%
- You are very cool and very sexy, your charm will never be defeated. I really like you.14%
- Everything about you makes me excited every time, you are funny. You always think positively.9%
- Ugh! You are annoying, very fierce and arrogant. You're too scary to talk to, I don't like you.1%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @meownsterr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Wdyt about me?
- Friendly and very nice, social butterfly, and very easy to talk to, very gentle. Let's get closer.76%
- You are very cool and very sexy, your charm will never be defeated. I really like you.14%
- Everything about you makes me excited every time, you are funny. You always think positively.9%
- Ugh! You are annoying, very fierce and arrogant. You're too scary to talk to, I don't like you.1%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2021 to 13 January 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“+” (@meownsterr), 9 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meownsterr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.