Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

звёздная теплица огуёков🪿

@meowitzy_hehe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

134subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002057135824
TypeChannel
Username@meowitzy_hehe
Descriptionадмин хочет вафли , пожертвуйте . парные авы с: @karamellovee лс: @ImYour_Star тт: tiktok.com/@meowitzy_hehe щп: https://t.me/+f9k-eGmX_s9hODhi анон: http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=geGkZve9Hti1WkQ коммишки не принимаю,я независимы й 🫶
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/meowitzy_hehe

Growth

1348 Aug 2026, 09:31 — 134 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:01 — 134 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:319 Aug 2026, 00:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:01134no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:31134first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.2%
avg views ÷ 134 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.6
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held16 (22 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,162
Reactions total117
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
758
Videos
167
Links
96

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53909336945611569032420.5%
custom 52580446189891219241613.7%
custom 54115935524068038801512.8%
custom 53777864131210391981311.1%
👾108.55%
🍓97.69%
custom 541118498934781395486.84%
💋54.27%
custom 539795189875609038743.42%
💘32.56%
custom 538631148082197791121.71%
🐳21.71%
👀21.71%
💊21.71%
10.855%
😨10.855%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC33 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

короче мега интерактив на ком будет больше реакций( из тех двоих, что выше. ) тому я полноценку нарисую.

custom 54111849893478139544custom 54115935524068038804custom 53777864131210391983

4 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC34 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

девочки волшебницы в тему да.

🐳2💘2custom 53979518987560903871custom 54115935524068038801

4 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC33 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

уффф краткий.........никогда его больше не нарисую ухуххух они с Ёшкой на одном листе бумаги типу мило.

custom 53777864131210391984custom 52580446189891219243🍓2custom 53909336945611569032custom 53979518987560903871custom 54115935524068038801

4 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 525804461898912192421custom 53909336945611569031

4 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC38 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ладно держите своего стесняшку ёшку.🥱

💋3custom 53777864131210391983🍓1💘1custom 52580446189891219241custom 53909336945611569031custom 54115935524068038801

4 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😑

🍓2custom 53777864131210391982👀1custom 53863114808219779111

2 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC51 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

сам не знаю для чего добавил функцию к анон комментариям. вдруг вам будет так по-комфортнее. готовьтесь, что я всегда могу его обратно удалить!

custom 52580446189891219244custom 53909336945611569032custom 53979518987560903872

1 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC74 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

глупенькие чего вы так яростно отписывайтесь. вы мне мотивации так никак не сможете добавить и никак не принесёте рост. и к инмт я не выгорал, если что.

custom 54115935524068038808custom 53909336945611569035💊2🍓1😨1

29 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC85 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

хорошо опенинг 3 сезона тоже очень крут. правда эндинг прямо слабоватый. больше под стиль семьи шпиона как по мне. кстати из за этой песни появился религиоз Ёшка.🤩

29 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC82 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

для меня опенинг 2-го сезона и эндинг первого и, конечно же, айдол всегда будут просто римской империей. и вообще все песни звёздного дитя. хоть вы и не шарите, всё равно посмотрите, очень красиво. и да, это та самая айдол беременна в 16 что зафорсилась в 23 году.🤩

👾2

27 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC95 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Краткий нормально придуматься никогда не сможет. остаёться ток коллабы.

custom 52580446189891219242custom 53909336945611569032👾1custom 53777864131210391981custom 53863114808219779111

27 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC97 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

по крупицам пытаюсь своё мировозрение об Азе и перестать его бояться. хочу максимально отдалить его от его стереотипного образа. ещё не закончил. но больше показывать не хочу. #скетч

custom 52580446189891219243🍓2👀1👾1custom 53909336945611569031

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @meowitzy_hehe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,108,991 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“звёздная теплица огуёков🪿” (@meowitzy_hehe), 134 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meowitzy_hehe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.