Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for оранжевая (психолог)

Channel

оранжевая (психолог)

@meoooww6169

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

128subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001955827263
TypeChannel
Username@meoooww6169
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/meoooww6169

Growth

12812 Aug 2026, 01:30 — 128 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 10:07 — 128 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 01:3012 Aug 2026, 10:07
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 127–129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:07128no change
12 Aug 2026, 01:30128first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54497919220905582845575.3%
custom 53458246022390164651824.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @meoooww6169. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 February 2026 to 16 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 May 2026, 01:42 UTC249 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zabombas161488

я ввожу в свою жизнь следующие эксперименты: • 1 день в неделю без телефона и без людей просто одна в мыслях. не важно где, главное без внешних факторов. для усложнения, можно попробовать весь день молчать, все мысли только на бумаге писать. иногда, если прям не в моготу, можно слушать музыку, но не лезть ни в какие другие приложения. • получить 100 отказов за месяц. выполнимое вполне себе задание, таким образом нау

custom 54497919220905582842

Signed fistashka1488

26 Apr 2026, 11:50 UTC222 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zabombas161488Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 54497919220905582842

Signed fistashka1488

26 Apr 2026, 05:33 UTC254 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 54497919220905582843

Signed fistashka1488

26 Apr 2026, 05:27 UTC244 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

друзья, есть имбовая техника, которую я либо вспомнила, либо мозг сам придумал (сомневаюсь). какая суть: у вас есть проблема, объект симпатии, незакрытый гештальт и тд. Берем лист бумаги (чем больше, тем лучше, можно даже ватман почему бы и да), в центре сверху обозначаем суть переживаний (пр: любите Пашу - пишите его имя, хуйня с родителями - «родители» и тд) Далее 3 столбика: Мысли Чувства Факты и по

custom 54497919220905582846custom 53458246022390164651

Signed fistashka1488

12 Mar 2026, 04:41 UTC364 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

дорогие друзья, всем привет, к сожалению, у меня был очень нестабильный период жизни и по действительно важным обстоятельствам я не могла писать сюда в целях безопасности (не моральное состояние, а просто вот невозможно было🥲) теперь я готова снова врываться сюда йоу

custom 54497919220905582847

Signed fistashka1488

15 Feb 2026, 00:44 UTC491 views6 reactions15 Starsread 12 August 2026

ну что, теперь разберем стресс, выгорание и как итог депрессивное состояние. я сама на днях столкнулась с этим явлением и сейчас ниже расскажу как пофиксить этого зверя, чтобы не охренеть от жизни

custom 54497919220905582846

Signed fistashka1488

9 Feb 2026, 02:05 UTC523 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

так произошло, что у меня сейчас крайне сложный период в жизни. события затрагивают все сферы, поэтому активность будет меньше, но она будет. ну а по прохождении периода я смогу поделиться своим опытом и на собственном примере раскрыть решения некоторых проблем. думаю для очень многих это будет полезно

custom 53458246022390164658custom 54497919220905582844

Signed fistashka1488

8 Feb 2026, 03:33 UTC453 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

как вы считаете, психолог может применять эзотерические методы или транслировать магическое мышление на сессиях?

  1. да22%
  2. нет78%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed fistashka1488

8 Feb 2026, 03:20 UTC373 viewsread 12 August 2026

дублирую: здесь будет контент о психологии, но не душно.+ интересные факты, иногда короткие видео, гс. ну и лайфстайл - делюсь опытом обучения на психолога. а всем, кому интересно наблюдать уже за моей личной жизнью велком сюда: https://t.me/+zeQ5JPXELOoyM2My

Signed fistashka1488

8 Feb 2026, 03:17 UTC327 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ментально осознанные друзья, есть у людей 2 проблемы: не думают вообще, или думают обо всем. и вот иногда нужно устроить себе детокс от осознанности, просвещения и тд. некоторых дебилов не нужно анализировать и думать почему он поступил так, ведь надо было по-другому. дебилы они на то и дебилы. поэтому здесь включаем похуизм, двигаясь дальше

custom 54497919220905582845

Signed fistashka1488

7 Feb 2026, 03:24 UTC288 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

фан факт: зачастую именно тревожников раздражают медлительные/ глупые люди. это все туда же, к потребности все контролировать. как это он так делает медленно? это не правильно, надо быстрее быть!! почему он глуповатый, тут же все просто! и если вас прям заботит такое, то скорее всего немного тревожка повышена. подобное происходит, тк есть страх не за человека, а за себя. (запомните: когда у вас кто-то или что-то из

custom 53458246022390164656

Signed fistashka1488

7 Feb 2026, 03:02 UTC236 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

и да. у вас НЕ обязательно все будет идеально! я знаю, что тут есть тревожники, которые боятся начинать что-то делать, потому что выйдет не идеально. но и хуй с ним! поставьте себе цель: сделаю на троечку, а дальше как будет. и так с чем угодно, что вызывает у вас страх! запомните: лучше попытаться и пожалеть, чем не делать ничего вы сильнее своего страха. это он часть вас, а не вы часть его. верю в каждого. дз о

custom 54497919220905582844

Signed fistashka1488

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @meoooww6169. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Feb 2026, 03:33 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

как вы считаете, психолог может применять эзотерические методы или транслировать магическое мышление на сессиях?

  1. да22%
  2. нет78%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Feb 2026, 05:27 UTCAnonymous Poll36 voters

у меня каша в голове, какая тема актуальна??

  1. тревожники28%
  2. здоровый похуизм и как достичь8%
  3. нарциссы6%
  4. любовь к себе8%
  5. одиночество8%
  6. тема рпп (+ самооценка)8%
  7. стресс, выгорание -> депрессивное состояние17%
  8. зависимости (самая сложная для меня тема, тк не специалист, со своей колокольни вещаю)6%
  9. раздражительность, проблемы с гневом (+ усталость) (+ тревожка)11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Feb 2026, 21:48 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

что воспринимается удобнее?

  1. пост с подробным текстом + картинки в нем же с основой содержимого56%
  2. видео короткое (до 1 мин) с основой32%
  3. гс подробное9%
  4. гс краткое3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 16 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Curly mum
@curly_mum · 220,206
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“оранжевая (психолог)” (@meoooww6169), 128 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meoooww6169.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.