ممنون;(🎐

Channel
𝖠𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖴𝗌 (𝑪𝑽)
@menwhocv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
201subscribers
+34 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003968759449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @menwhocv |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/menwhocv |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 201 | +34 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 167 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 167 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 46.2%
- avg views ÷ 201 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 92.8
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (2 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,207 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 41s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
دوستش داشته باشید:[
Sticker, posted without a caption
🀢 🀣 🀦 🀤 ❝ 𝖬𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗅𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝒉𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗒 𝗅𝗈𝗈𝗄 𝖺𝗍 𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾, 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝑓𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗉𝗉𝖾𝖺𝗋. ❞ 𓆸 ╰┈ #𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗅𝗈𝖿𝗌𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗐
𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗒𝖺𝗇𝗅𝗂.
ᝰ 𝑊𝐸𝑁 𝐶𝐿𝐴𝑁 𝗈𝖿 𝖰𝗂𝗌𝗁𝖺𝗇 𝗉𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖺 𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗅𝖾𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗉. 𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖾, 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖽, 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗎𝗌, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖾. 𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗍 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗅𝗒, 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖿𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗒 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾."
ᝰ 𝐿𝐴𝑁𝐿𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝐽𝐼𝑁 𝐶𝐿𝐴𝑁 i𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾, 𝗐𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗁, 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍, 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗎𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾, 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖼𝖼𝖺𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗉𝖾𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗉𝗈𝗐𝖾𝗋, 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁 𝗂𝗍 𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝖿𝗍𝖾𝗇 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖾, 𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗒, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗌 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗀𝗀𝗅𝖾𝗌
ᝰ 𝑄𝐼𝑁𝐺𝐻𝐸 𝑁𝐼𝐸 𝐶𝐿𝐴𝑁 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗀𝗍𝗁, 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾, 𝗅𝗈𝗒𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗒, 𝗁𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗋, 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾, 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝖾𝖺𝗄, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗒 𝖻𝖺𝗍𝗍𝗅𝖾 𝗁𝖾𝖺𝖽-𝗈𝗇, 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇 𝗂𝖿 𝗂𝗍 𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗌."
ᝰ 𝐺𝑈𝑆𝑈 𝐿𝐴𝑁 𝐶𝐿𝐴𝑁 𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾, 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗒, 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾, 𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖿-𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅, 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾, 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖽 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇, 𝖺 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖾, 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝗎𝗅𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗉𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗎𝗂𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍
ᝰ ⚠️𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗅 𝗐𝖺𝗋𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀; #𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗒𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗆𝗒𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗒 #𝖿𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗌𝗈𝖿𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇e #𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗆 #𝗆𝗒𝗃𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗒𝗍𝗈𝗒𝗈𝗎 #𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗅𝗈𝖿𝗌𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗐 #𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖽
🀢 🀣 🀦 🀤 ❝ 𝗂𝖿 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝗆𝖾, 𝗅𝖾𝗍 𝗆𝖾 𝗀𝗈— 𝖮𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗒 𝗂 𝖺𝗆 𝗀𝗈𝗇𝗇𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝗈𝗐 𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 ❞ 𓆸 ╰┈ 𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒: 𝖬𝖾𝗇𝗐𝗁𝗈𝖼𝗏
ᝰ 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝖨'𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖾𝗍 𝐼 𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢, 𝖻𝖺𝖻𝗒, 𝖨 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝖾 #𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @menwhocv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 851,102 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ 𝖠𝗋𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝖴𝗌 (𝑪𝑽)” (@menwhocv), 201 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/menwhocv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.