‼️New 1:1 Mentorship Batch ‼️ 📢Starting From tomorrow 📚

Channel
MentorMee
@mentormeein
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,991subscribers
-636 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001514714909 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mentormeein |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mentormeein |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 12,991 | -70 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 13,061 | -30 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 13,091 | -19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 13,110 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 13,126 | -41 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 13,167 | -48 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 13,215 | -43 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 13,258 | -22 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 13,280 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:09 | 13,288 | -22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:27 | 13,310 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 13,327 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 13,346 | -30 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 13,376 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 13,381 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 13,392 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 13,407 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 13,436 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 13,454 | -31 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 13,485 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.69%
- avg views ÷ 12,991 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 350
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (11 July 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,049 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
69 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 79.7% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 10.1% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 8.70% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
1:1 Mentorship NEET 2027 New Batch : 1 September 📚 Interested Students Can Whatsapp : 8856038603
Photo, posted without a caption
Happy Independence Day ❤️
❤18
Photo, posted without a caption
Weekly Schedule 1:1 Mentorship For Personal Mentorship Student 🔖
❤12
Good Morning Everyone! 🌅 We’re currently planning to start the MentorMee Virtual Library for NEET 2027 — a daily study environment focused on consistency, accountability & healthy competition. 📚 For the initial phase, we’re looking for students who already have a study circle of serious NEET aspirants among their friends, classmates, coaching/tuition groups, etc. 👉 Ideally, you should be able to bring together 10–…
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Agar App 10 Students Ka Group bana loge toh Hum sathe mai Daily Padai Kar sahkte hai - Virtual Library
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4
Yaha Pe Koi Serious NEET 2027 Aspirants hai kya ? App se kuch puchna hai ?
- Haa Hum hai Serious83%
- Nahi . NEET Nahi karna20%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Thank You for Your Overwhelming Response 🙌 Program is Officially Closed ‼️
❤7🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @mentormeein. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Yaha Pe Koi Serious NEET 2027 Aspirants hai kya ? App se kuch puchna hai ?
- Haa Hum hai Serious83%
- Nahi . NEET Nahi karna20%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Are of you are preparing for NEET 2027 ?
- Yes65%
- No37%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TheApronBoy · 87,977
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 August 2026
@qualityspeaks2 · 35,213
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 2 September 2026
@mibdrnksharma · 32,448
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 4 September 2026
@medicoom · 22,489
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 20 September 2026
@AtharvaAggarwal · 56,713
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 August 2026
@aiimsonianARS · 96,382
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
@Pwvidyapeethneetdropper · 24,769
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 15 September 2026
@FutureDoctorsr · 31,369
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 5 September 2026
@neetwallahpw · 356,568
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 11 August 2026
@pratibhayadavbiology · 24,631
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 15 September 2026
@deepakaiimsonian · 25,988
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 12 September 2026
@ksquareofficial · 26,665
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 11 September 2026
@neetalchemybyunacademy · 44,038
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@parthneet · 135,735
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 September 2026
@Pankaj_Sir_Chemistry01 · 96,317
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 16 August 2026
@MemoNeet_NCERT · 81,738
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 18 August 2026
@unacademyneet_official · 97,061
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 15 August 2026
@drrakshitasingh · 175,768
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 August 2026
@amantilakorg · 180,786
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 August 2026
@pw_yakeendropper · 175,646
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
@Ektasoni18 · 39,088
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 30 August 2026
@renuka_biologyatease · 152,498
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 August 2026
@seepmaam · 419,272
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 11 August 2026
@Physics_Wallah_Official_Channel · 532,845
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MentorMee” (@mentormeein), 12,991 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentormeein.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.