Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AiimsonianARS

Channel

AiimsonianARS

@aiimsonianARS

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

93,262subscribers

-7,196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001403370393
TypeChannel
Username@aiimsonianARS
DescriptionWelcome to My Telegram Channel. I am Dr Aryan Raj Singh AIIMS DELHI - NEET UG AIR 9, AIIMS UG AIR 11 and UP State Rank 1. I also Cracked NEET PG with AIR 397 and AIIMS PG with AIR 104 and 328. NO GUTS,NO GLORY💪🫶 #Keephustling🤟
CreatedBetween 1 March 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/aiimsonianARS

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@NEETprep/3785011 Sept 2026, 15:09 UTC@aiimsonianARS/23771 · this entry11 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC1.002 minutes
@NEETprep/3785111 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC@aiimsonianARS/23773 · this entry11 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC1.0072 seconds
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@NEETprep5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@NEETprep (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 38 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

93,262100,45896,8607 August 202610 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 95 days, net -7,196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92,183–101,537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 11:0693,262-105
8 Nov 2026, 19:4193,367-73
7 Nov 2026, 13:4793,440-69
6 Nov 2026, 11:1693,509-78
5 Nov 2026, 07:4593,587-35
4 Nov 2026, 08:5793,622-76
3 Nov 2026, 07:0893,698-64
2 Nov 2026, 03:3593,762-52
1 Nov 2026, 05:4093,814-89
31 Oct 2026, 04:4993,903-83
30 Oct 2026, 03:0893,986-60
29 Oct 2026, 05:4094,046-62
28 Oct 2026, 03:3594,108-76
27 Oct 2026, 04:2094,184-52
26 Oct 2026, 03:4594,236-47
25 Oct 2026, 00:0694,283-74
24 Oct 2026, 01:4594,357-56
23 Oct 2026, 00:5794,413-108
21 Oct 2026, 20:3994,521-67
20 Oct 2026, 16:0894,588first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 202 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.55%
avg views ÷ 93,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,980
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.452%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held82 (26 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total167,516
Reactions total757
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 06:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,310
Videos
≈207
Links
≈5,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,216 reactions across 80 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,25470.1%
🫡42713.3%
👍1865.78%
🔥1625.04%
💯1304.04%
😢70.218%
😭70.218%
🥰70.218%
🎉50.155%
🤓50.155%
✍30.093%
🌚30.093%
👻30.093%
😍30.093%
🤔30.093%
🆒20.062%
🍓20.062%
🤨20.062%
🎃10.031%
👏10.031%
3 further kinds30.093%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (28.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 05:47 UTC386 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Short Notes posted on the Ultimate Revision Telegram Group of All India Rank 8, Swayam Shakti Tripathi...currently in AIIMS Delhi!!!

🫡3

11 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,550 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Posting Revision Material for 22 Nov Test (1st test of ASCEND 5.0) on the Revision Group (https://t.me/+QEw8GPHxUVA4Njg1) Syllabus of the test (captured in Test Planner above is): Physics: Units & Measurements, Motion in a Straight Line, Motion in a Plane, Laws of Motion, Work, Energy & Power. Chemistry: Some Basic Concepts of Chemistry, Structure of Atom, Classification of Elements and Periodicity in Properties Bio…

🫡3❤1

11 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,580 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
File

Another chance to start testing NOW!!! Fill Google Form (https://forms.gle/hZjJxuq7ugjao8sm7) to get a call and discuss which option is best for you out of 6 options for test series at 350+ locations across India!!

🫡3❤1

6 Nov 2026, 04:40 UTC≈4,670 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

If you always wanted to join Target Batch for question practice & testing, WE WILL MAKE SURE YOU JOIN. 👉Fill Google Form from the link https://forms.gle/hZjJxuq7ugjao8sm7 and our person will help you. Practice 27,000+ questions (0.5 level + Recommended MCQs + Recommended PYQs) from now till NEET from Target Batch...YOU CAN DO IT!!

❤18🫡4

30 Oct 2026, 14:23 UTC≈8,130 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Topic wise correct percentage is available in Target Batch. You can now see it in performance snapshot!!! 4 STUDENTS got into AIIMS DELHI after NEET 2026 who practiced MCQs & Tests from Target Batch!! Proud of Target Batch...it started as my idea in 2020, then discussed it with Kapil sir...and it slowly developed into THE MOST CREDIBLE source of MCQ practice & Testing for NEET aspirants. No Topper will give this mu…

❤24🤓1🫡1

29 Oct 2026, 02:29 UTC≈8,410 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Only 27% got this right!!! You are targeting 350+ in Biology or you want to fall in love with Biology...you must be on Dr. N.K.Sharma's channel (@mibdrnksharma)

🫡12❤6

29 Oct 2026, 02:29 UTC≈7,780 views25 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @mibdrnksharmaPoll

"Girdling Experiment" was performed by Plant Physiologists to identify the plant tissue through which:

  1. osmosis is observed17%
  2. water is transported17%
  3. food is transported28%
  4. for both water and food transportation38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤10🫡7🤓4🌚2🔥1🥰1

27 Oct 2026, 16:50 UTC≈8,460 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
File

Test Planner of ASCEND 4.0 Classroom Test Series starting on 08 Nov. Must start testing now. Don't postpone. No excuses. Fill Google Form (https://forms.gle/hZjJxuq7ugjao8sm7) to get a call to discuss which option is best for you out of 6 options for test series

❤2🍓1🫡1

26 Oct 2026, 08:56 UTC≈8,870 views23 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤19🫡2🍓1🤔1

26 Oct 2026, 08:56 UTC≈10,300 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Might hurt but do listen👆🏼

🫡7👍1🥰1

26 Oct 2026, 08:56 UTC≈10,900 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/5I3gSFkaSdM?si=ALBZhl81yzIqYPJo

🫡4👍1

25 Oct 2026, 10:06 UTC≈9,060 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @NEETprep

Posted without readable text

❤14🫡2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @aiimsonianARS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@aiimsonianARS edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @aiimsonianARS as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
28 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Oct 2026, 02:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,570 voters approx.

"Girdling Experiment" was performed by Plant Physiologists to identify the plant tissue through which:

  1. osmosis is observed17%
  2. water is transported17%
  3. food is transported28%
  4. for both water and food transportation38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

NEETprep.com - PURE MCQ Practice & Testing Courses
@NEETprep · 91,688
#1
Manish raj mr sir
@mrphysicss · 463,982
#2
NEET Wallah
@neetwallahpw · 360,091
#3
NEET BIOLOGY - DR. NK SHARMA
@mibdrnksharma · 31,129
#4
Yakeen Legend 2026 Neet Physics wallah
@Yakeen_legend_Neet_2026_Pw · 23,085
#5
Biology at Ease
@renuka_biologyatease · 147,891
#6
Physics with Vivek sir
@phyviveksir · 948
#7
Aman Tilak Organisation
@amantilakorg · 173,867
#8
Dr. Anand Mani
@anandmani001 · 79,890
#9
Avinash Sharma
@Heyavinash2022 · 44,470
#10
Chemistry with Shashi sir
@ShashiBhushan_Chemistry · 3,905
#11
Seep Pahuja Biology - Official Unacademy
@seepmaam · 411,365
#12
NEET_Counselling_ADDA247
@NEET_Counselling_ADDA247 · 79,724
#13
NEET Ki Duniya
@pw_yakeendropper · 171,962
#14
Tamanna Chaudhary
@physics_tcarmy · 99,089
#15
🌟The Apron Boy🌟
@TheApronBoy · 84,272
#16
MemoNeet | Free NEET Practice & 3D Shorts
@MemoNeet_NCERT · 81,847
#17
Dr Rishabh & Future Doctors
@FutureDoctorsr · 30,345
#18
Anmol Sharma Sir Biology NEET UG
@anmolsharmalive · 94,380
#19
Ritu Rattewal Official
@RITULIVE · 68,717
#20
TNM Sir - Physical Chemistry
@tnmsirpc · 14,005
#21
Pulkit Yadav (VMMC)
@neetleading · 3,968
#22
manthan_2_0_batch_lectures_2026
@Manthan_2_0_Batch_lectures_2026 · 3
#23
Pankaj Sir Chemistry ≛
@Pankaj_Sir_Chemistry01 · 96,121
#24
MentorMee
@mentormeein · 12,409
#25
Ncert Abhyas batch Aman tilak
@Ncert_abhyas · 15,931
#26
Beauty jha- NEET Dropper mentorship
@medicobeautyjha · 10,290
#27
ATHARVA AGGARWAL OFFICIAL
@AtharvaAggarwal · 53,625
#28
SANKALP NEET VEDANTU
@sankalpneetvedantu · 73,075
#29
NEET PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTION | NEET PYQ | JEE MAINS PYQ
@NEET_PREVIOUS_YEAR_QUESTION · 2,572
#30
NEET ADDA247
@neetpreparationadda247 · 100,560
#31
YSYSir- Organic Chemistry
@itsysys · 13,875
#32
Physics Wallah - Alakh Pandey (Official)
@Physics_Wallah_Official_Channel · 525,380
#33
PW Lakshya NEET - Class 12th
@PWlLakshyaNEET12thclass · 7,297
#34
Prateek Jain - Physics (NEET)
@neet_physics · 95,330
#35
SKC SIR - CHEMISTRY WORLD PW
@absolutealcohol · 93,133
#36
Deepak AIIMSonian
@deepakaiimsonian · 25,171
#37
NEET HANDWRITTEN NOTES
@NEET_HANDWRITTEN_SHORTNOTES · 8,079
#38
NEWLIGHT TEST SERIES
@NEWLIGHT_TEST_SERIES1 · 6,241
#39
BiologyDefinite
@Biologydefinite · 3,390
#40
NEET Alchemy by Unacademy
@neetalchemybyunacademy · 41,813
#41
Unacademy NEET Toppers
@unacademyneettoppers · 67,792
#42
ALLEN NEET Official 🩺
@ALLENNEETOfficial · 184,880
#43
Target NEET with Dr. Aditya Sanjay Gupta
@TargetwithDrAditya · 12,067
#44
SARTHA NEET Counseling 2026
@ncertmorise · 9,692
#45
Chemistry Simplified by ACiD Sir Unacademy
@acidsirone · 25,696
#46
NEET 2024 NOTIFICATIONS
@NEET_UG_Updates · 4,457
#47
New Light Institute
@NewLightInstitutekanpur · 34,868
#48
Physics with Ankur sir
@phyankursir · 8,228
#49
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅɪᴀʀʏ ᴏꜰ ʜᴇʀ ᴅʀᴇᴀᴍꜱ
@TheDiaryOfHerDreams · 1,863
#50
PGprep by DrARS
@PGprepwithDrARS · 6,577
#51
Midnight Arena ✨
@Midnight_Arena · 2,933
#52
Live Lectures Yakeen Neet 2.0 2027
@LIVE_LECTURES_YAKEEN_NEET_2_0 · 17,842
#53
INORGANIC_BY_RD Sir
@iocbyrdsir · 11,606
#54

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Deepak AIIMSonian
@deepakaiimsonian · 25,171
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 12 September 2026
NEETprep.com - PURE MCQ Practice & Testing Courses
@NEETprep · 91,688
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 16 August 2026
Dr. Rakshita Singh🐝
@drrakshitasingh · 168,394
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 August 2026
NEET BIOLOGY - DR. NK SHARMA
@mibdrnksharma · 31,129
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 4 September 2026
MemoNeet | Free NEET Practice & 3D Shorts
@MemoNeet_NCERT · 81,847
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 18 August 2026
Biology at Ease
@renuka_biologyatease · 147,891
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 August 2026
(QS) Quality Speaks KOTA
@qualityspeaks2 · 33,916
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 2 September 2026
Dr Rishabh & Future Doctors
@FutureDoctorsr · 30,345
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 5 September 2026
Avinash Sharma
@Heyavinash2022 · 44,470
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 26 August 2026
Anmol Sharma Sir Biology NEET UG
@anmolsharmalive · 94,380
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 16 August 2026
Dr. Parth Goyal Official
@parthneet · 135,971
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 September 2026
Dr. Anand Mani
@anandmani001 · 79,890
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
Aman Tilak Organisation
@amantilakorg · 173,867
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 August 2026
Dr.Sumit Prajapat [ NEXT DOCTORs ]
@sumitprajapatarya · 22,323
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 26 September 2026
PW AITS YAKEEN NEET TEST SERIES 2027
@PW_YAKEEN_NEET_AITS_TEST_SERIES · 36,304
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 8 September 2026
AIIMS Pioneer ( Nikhil Bhaiya)
@Aiimspioneer · 30,714
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 4 September 2026
ATHARVA AGGARWAL OFFICIAL
@AtharvaAggarwal · 53,625
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 August 2026
🌟The Apron Boy🌟
@TheApronBoy · 84,272
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 August 2026
Manish raj mr sir
@mrphysicss · 463,982
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 11 August 2026
neetaspirentsorg
@NeetAspirentsOrg · 2
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 12 September 2026
Ritu Rattewal Official
@RITULIVE · 68,717
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 August 2026
Tamanna Chaudhary
@physics_tcarmy · 99,089
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 15 August 2026
NEET Ki Duniya
@pw_yakeendropper · 171,962
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
Lakshya Ambastha
@LakshyaAmbastha · 22,668
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AiimsonianARS” (@aiimsonianARS), 93,262 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aiimsonianARS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.