👉Fill Google Form from the link https://forms.gle/hZjJxuq7ugjao8sm7 to talk to our support person to join Target Batch!!
🫡6

Channel
@aiimsonianARS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
96,382subscribers
-4,076 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001403370393 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aiimsonianARS |
| Description | Welcome to My Telegram Channel. I am Dr Aryan Raj Singh AIIMS DELHI - NEET UG AIR 9, AIIMS UG AIR 11 and UP State Rank 1. I also Cracked NEET PG with AIR 397 and AIIMS PG with AIR 104 and 328. NO GUTS,NO GLORY💪🫶 #Keephustling🤟 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aiimsonianARS |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 96,382 | -536 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 96,918 | -134 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 97,052 | -124 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 97,176 | -78 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 97,254 | -179 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 97,433 | -174 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 97,607 | -283 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 97,890 | -171 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:23 | 98,061 | -97 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:47 | 98,158 | -93 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:12 | 98,251 | -101 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 98,352 | -56 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 98,408 | -84 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 98,492 | -91 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 98,583 | -56 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 98,639 | -49 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 98,688 | -59 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 98,747 | -91 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 98,838 | -143 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 98,981 | first reading |
48 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (26 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 103,920 |
| Reactions total | 244 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,310 reactions across 46 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 968 | 73.9% | |
| 🫡 | 269 | 20.5% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 1.68% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 1.68% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 0.534% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.382% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.305% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.229% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.153% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.153% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.076% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👉Fill Google Form from the link https://forms.gle/hZjJxuq7ugjao8sm7 to talk to our support person to join Target Batch!!
🫡6
This is why my Target Batch is OP!!! Proud of Target Batch...it started as my idea in 2020, then discussed it with Kapil sir...and it slowly developed into THE MOST CREDIBLE source of MCQ practice & Testing for NEET aspirants. No Topper will give this much time to a course unless it is THE BEST!!!
❤9🫡1
Hello Kapil Sir! I just wanted to thank you and the NEETprep team. The quality of questions on NEETprep has really helped me improve my problem-solving and perform well in my PW Arjuna tests. Because of my consistent performance, I’ve now been selected for the Arjuna NEET Rankers 2027, an exclusive batch with only around 100–150 students. I genuinely feel NEETprep played a big role in this achievement. Thank you so m…
❤10
Posted without readable text
❤12🫡2
I also support this. Please sign this petition to release AIIMS Past Year Papers. Students waste their time on BOGUS AIIMS PYQs...this must stop!!
🫡47👍6❤5🥰1
https://youtu.be/vpr3t5BMn5k
🫡19❤11
MUST JOIN NOW and build confidence in one of the toughest chapters of Physical Chemistry!!
🫡5
https://www.youtube.com/live/CafXA3DIay4
🫡5
Fill Google Form (https://forms.gle/hZjJxuq7ugjao8sm7) to join Target Batch (Gold Standard for NEET Question Practice & Testing) Target Batch is EXCLUSIVE course for question practice & testing (No Lectures. No Live Classes)
❤6🫡3
Bhai sahab ChatGPT bhi trend follow kr rha hai 😎
🫡21🔥7❤2🤔2
One quick correction in the video. Chemistry syllabus is as per old syllabus and we missed it. Chemistry syllabus will be: 1. Redox Reactions 2. Electrochemistry 3. Chemical Kinetics.
❤11🫡3
You can attempt Classroom Test Series of NEETprep in NTA-CBT mode or Pen Paper OMR mode Till government announces the mode!! Fill Google Form (https://forms.gle/hZjJxuq7ugjao8sm7) to get discuss which option is best for you out of 6 options for test series
🫡6😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @aiimsonianARS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@aiimsonianARS edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AiimsonianARS” (@aiimsonianARS), 96,382 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aiimsonianARS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.