Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 42 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 354–367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:41
355
-1
9 Sept 2026, 16:59
356
-2
31 Aug 2026, 17:04
358
-3
16 Aug 2026, 02:18
361
-4
8 Aug 2026, 06:31
365
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:11
365
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 56s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
139 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
49
35.3%
❤
47
33.8%
👍
15
10.8%
😁
7
5.04%
🎉
5
3.60%
💯
5
3.60%
🗿
3
2.16%
😱
2
1.44%
🤝
2
1.44%
🤯
2
1.44%
⚡
1
0.719%
👌
1
0.719%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 14 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mentor_in_biz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2026 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Когда-то мне попался этот фильм и я не смогла переключиться, посмотрела его до конца. Позднее опять пересматривала, чтобы глубже понять сюжет и историю главного персонажа.
Это тот случай, когда не все однозначно с первого раза, и именно это осознание цепляет и заставляет возвращаться к просмотру снова.
Фильм заставляет задуматься над простыми, но важными вещами. И так получилось, что в моей семье сейчас аналогичная …
Сегодня День российского предпринимательства. Этот праздник был установлен Указом Президента в 2007 году
Цель праздника — подчеркнуть вклад предпринимателей в развитие экономики, привлечь внимание к проблемам малого и среднего бизнеса, а также подчеркнуть значимость бизнес-сообщества для страны.
Так ли это на самом деле? Оправдывает такое внимание ту действительность, которую мы видим - это большой вопрос.
Скажу че…
Ну что, друзья, добро пожаловать в новую реальность!
Честно говоря, в последнее время не знаю, что и писать: только мы отходим от одной «хорошей» новости, как прилетает другая.
Я сегодня сделала практически все из этого списка. Хотя понимаю, что возможности для оплаты всегда найдутся.
У меня лично один вопрос остается: зачем власть все это допускает, учитывая, что бюджет трещит по швам, а миллиарды рублей наши граж…
Очередной актуальный и смешной ролик от талантливого Андрея Зайцева https://t.me/andreyzaitsevt
Пока все в панике от того, что происходит и куда бежать дальше, давайте по факту ⤵️
Алгоритмы меняются, аудитория кочует между платформами, а форматы устаревают быстрее, чем мы успеваем привыкнуть.
Часто звучат мнения про переход в новые мессенджеры, и вот, что, на мой взгляд, эксперты недооценивают:
Конечно-же подстраи…
Я уверена: каждый эксперт может создать свой уникальный продукт и зарабатывать на нем стабильно 300-500 тыс. в месяц
Любую задачу можно решить, если видеть общую картину и понимать, где сосредоточить усилия.
Когда я начинаю работу с экспертом, я всегда смотрю в глубину - какие решения принимались раньше, почему именно так и как это повлияло на результат. Этот стратегический взгляд помогает быстро выявить ключевые т…
Утро субботы провела на мастермайнде с юристами. Давно думала организовать свой, но все не хватает ресурсов. А ресурсов мне нужно много, я всегда по-максимуму вкладываюсь в экспертов, вне зависимости от того, какой это продукт: платный или бесплатный.
И я заметила такую вещь: как только начинаю «тянуть» других, давать много пользы бесплатно, у меня уходит энергия, и появляется какой-то хаос. А все потому, что я сил…
Провели эфир, разобрали всю систему. Участников было немного, поэтому получилось разобрать запросы каждого 🙌🔥
По технической причине записи нет. Но если вы хотите понять, как создать именно вашу систему продаж, пишите мне в личные сообщения @elnech «система», и я отвечу на ваши вопросы.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mentor_in_biz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена Нечаева | продажи и масштаб” (@mentor_in_biz), 355 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentor_in_biz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.