Это всё закончилось Хорошо, что диплом синий, красный бы сливался с платьем🙏
custom 52309722890712197015custom 54002822578165731943custom 53098025182539457651

Channel
@mentaldumpnotes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
34subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003589495236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mentaldumpnotes |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 27 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mentaldumpnotes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 34 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 34 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (27 May 2026 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 94 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5400282257816573194 | 22 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5230972289071219701 | 21 | 23.9% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5451935737836488236 | 10 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5309802518253945765 | 4 | 4.55% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5938425687021986461 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| custom 5192988878205645310 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.14% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это всё закончилось Хорошо, что диплом синий, красный бы сливался с платьем🙏
custom 52309722890712197015custom 54002822578165731943custom 53098025182539457651
🌟25.06.26🌟 Happy 23🤮 Думала как-то подписать пост, поэтому долго не выкладывала Но в итоге не собрала мысли в текст В общем, вот так вот отпраздновали ДР
custom 540028225781657319410custom 54519357378364882363custom 52309722890712197011
Биотипы расстройства дефицита внимания и гиперактивности (РДВГ) Практически как продолжение рассуждения о гетерогенности РАС вышла статья про гетерогенность РДВГ (кратко на русском и первоисточник). Авторы проанализировали данные структурной МРТ у детей с РДВГ, выявили 3 подтипа с разными нарушениями как клиническими, так и нейробиологическими, и проверили выводы на независимой выборке. Было выявлено три основных …
custom 59384256870219864612custom 54002822578165731941
Ответ! 🌸МК проводила https://t.me/ya_kica. Советую🌟
custom 52309722890712197014❤3🙏1
Мое ожерелье под номером...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Посетила мастер-класс по созданию ожерелья Хочу, чтобы вы попробовали угадать, какое сделала я🐇
custom 54519357378364882361
Сшила диплом под цвет ноготочков
❤6custom 54002822578165731945custom 52309722890712197014custom 53098025182539457651custom 54519357378364882361
Недавно была на презентации книги «Тяжёлая жизнь с "лёгким" аутизмом». В печатной версии издательство выпустило её под названием «Аутизм у взрослых». Зоя Соколова (клинический психолог и сама женщина с РАСДВГ) совместно с психиатром Кириллом Сычёвым, который, кстати, тоже человек с СДВГ, написали книгу по аутизму, основанную на современном представлении о нём. Во время лекции Зоя Соколова сказала, что сейчас будет …
custom 52309722890712197017❤3🕊1🆒1custom 53098025182539457651custom 54002822578165731941custom 59384256870219864611
🤩Траты на мое здоровье за май-начало июня🤩 ⭐️повторный приёма у психиатра - 7 000р. ⭐️лекарства (ежемесячный платёж) - 4 200р. ⭐️МРТ - 5 600р. и вот скоро пойду к неврологу за 9 500р. разбираться со своей хронически больной поясницей🤩 Действительно крутые врачи обходятся дороже. Но у меня хотя бы есть уверенность, что не придётся тратить время и деньги на неэффективные (или даже опасные) назначения и на поиски адек…
❤3🤯2🙏1custom 51929888782056453101custom 54002822578165731941custom 54519357378364882361
Книгу саму не читала пока, но уже приглянулась эта таблица. Можно использовать как методичку при общении🤝
custom 54519357378364882364🤯2⚡1💯1🕊1custom 51929888782056453101custom 53098025182539457651custom 54002822578165731941
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mentaldumpnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мое ожерелье под номером...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,044,917 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mental dump // notes” (@mentaldumpnotes), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentaldumpnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.