【验证留名】胖哥 【验证时间】2026年 07月 19日 【老师花名】梦婷 【联系方式】https://t.me/wuhanhua1/15252 【卫生环境】很好 【所在位置】汉口 【修车水费】16pp 【服务内容】例子: 情趣调情,69,🐍,各种姿势,课表内容都有) 【服务过程】:我只能说大队的兄弟吃的真好,珍惜白皮,三点粉,人照误差165的嫩妹还是大蟒蛇真是极品,有一大拇指左右的稀疏毛发,逼是真好看又粉又肥上品鲍鱼。还有老师刚下海的口齿不太灵活但是很配合,蛇多久都可以(蛇党狂喜)紧润是嫩妹的优势,做爱经验比较匮乏,看后续老哥的调教了,(没有纹身,肤色正常,🐻真是极品c,最后文明出击,不要暴力驾驶考试老师第一天上班就哭了) 【推荐程度】:必返(9.5) 【所在群组】https://t.me/wuhanlou

Channel
梦婷的小家园
@meng521000
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
641subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003993036158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meng521000 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 17 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meng521000 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 641 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 648 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 648 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 127.5%
- avg views ÷ 641 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 817
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.082%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (17 June 2026 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,269 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/wh229777/3598
❤1
【验证留名】飞哥 【验证时间】2026年 07月 18日 【老师花名】梦婷 【联系方式】https://t.me/wuhanhua1/17032 【卫生环境】很好 【所在位置】硚口 【修车水费】8p 【服务内容】例子: 情趣调情,69,🐍,各种姿势,课表内容都有) 【服务过程】:终于约上了梦婷老师了,不得不说真人比照片好看多了,很有礼貌的招待,服务也是该有的都有,身材匀称身上一点赘肉没有,胸粉,挺,太完美了,老师刚下海没多久,兄弟们冲啊,约到就是赚到…下边紧致水多,要不是下午有事,直接pp了,给个好评。 过两天不忙了继续cj 【推荐程度】10 【优点缺点】全是优点,奶子好看,粉,挺,紧,水多多 【机车行为】无 【推荐程度】9.5分(10分最高,最好不要10分) 【所在群组】https://t.me/wuhanlou
元气少女美美哒🥰🥰🥰
❤1
【验证留名】仓桥 【验证时间】2026年 06月 20日 【老师花名】梦婷 【联系方式】https://t.me/wuhanhua1/15252 【卫生环境】很好 【所在位置】南湖 【修车水费】8p 【服务内容】例子: 情趣调情,69,🐍,各种姿势,课表内容都有) 【服务过程】:为什么要吃嫩妹,吃的就是这一口调教,懵懂。笨拙的舌头在你的指挥下摩擦着你的敏感部位,那份羞涩不安的神情能极大满足你的征服欲 梦婷老师就是这样的,大开门的嫩,条子柔顺。把玩着她的敏感部位会手脚无措的闭着眼,品尝着小豆豆时会双腿用力的夹住你双腿,明明会动情却不敢睁开眼睛 必须要让他睁开眼睛看着大肉棒塞进她的小穴,享受爱欲在小穴里面膨胀,在一点一点的退出然后又快速的进入,我告诉梦婷这个过程就叫做造爱,这需要两个人的配合你必须要睁开眼看着我,抱着我。没有投入的造爱只能叫做交配,老师听懂了,在她的浅吟,嘶叫下,我开始以三快一慢的频率重复…
❤4
https://t.me/Jmnu027a/2335
来了一个人被打了两针🥹🥹🥹
❤1
又是元气满满哒一天🥰🥰🥰
https://t.me/wuhan_899/662
【验证留名】匿名 【验证时间】2026.6.18 【老师花名】梦婷 【联系方式】https://t.me/wuhanhua1/15252 【卫生环境】小区、干净整洁 【所在位置】南湖附近 【修车水费】16pp 【服务内容】鸳鸯浴,情趣调情,69,🐍,各种姿势,课表内容都有 【服务过程】见到妹妹的一瞬间就觉得很可爱好心动、真人比照片视频还要好看;jk装像从漫画出来一样,胸大屁股大腿细腰细腿长,肌肉线条恰到好处,气质体态都很好;妹妹性格比较细腻安静,但服务态度很认真,一点都不催,没有那种老油条的装模作样;基本上做的姿势都能接受,妹妹比较娇小,可能还是传教士更匹配一点和妹妹的🐍和69就像和恋人一样亲切,妹妹下面比较紧,热热的有包裹感,👄的时候也很细心谨慎胸型很挺很圆润,大的同时丝毫没有下垂的痕迹,是百分百的真🐻,手感超好洗面奶超级舒服;但除去妹妹外在硬件的这些优势以外让我更喜欢的还是内在情绪上的深刻感受:经历复杂浮躁的社会、带着疲惫的…
❤1
晚安~我的欧巴🥰🥰
梦婷的小家园 pinned a video
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @meng521000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 877,363 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“梦婷的小家园” (@meng521000), 641 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meng521000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.