Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Men Ayolman ❤️

Channel

Men Ayolman ❤️

@men_ayolman_vebinar

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

18,206subscribers

-2,854 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002813394042
TypeChannel
Username@men_ayolman_vebinar
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 October 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/men_ayolman_vebinar

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ayollik_yadrosi/7313 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC@men_ayolman_vebinar/1304 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@ayollik_yadrosi/7325 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC@men_ayolman_vebinar/1305 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC1.00under a minute
@men_ayolman_vebinar/1306 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC@ayollik_yadrosi/7335 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@ayollik_yadrosi/7345 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC@men_ayolman_vebinar/1307 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC1.002 minutes
@men_ayolman_vebinar/1315 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC@ayollik_yadrosi/7426 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@ayollik_yadrosi/7436 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC@men_ayolman_vebinar/1316 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ayollik_yadrosi15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (14–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @men_ayolman_vebinar — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

18,20621,06019,6337 August 2026 — 21,060 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,060 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,020 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,989 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,940 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,920 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,883 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,836 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,757 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,698 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,696 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,664 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,625 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,578 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,519 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,475 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,415 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,354 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,302 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,281 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,236 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,195 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,147 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,116 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,071 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,011 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,953 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,836 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,749 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,710 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,662 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,564 subscribers25 September 2026 — 19,226 subscribers4 October 2026 — 18,975 subscribers8 October 2026 — 18,871 subscribers12 October 2026 — 18,743 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,728 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,710 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,669 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,644 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,615 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,579 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,537 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,487 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,443 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,405 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,371 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,332 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,302 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,268 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,241 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,206 subscribers7 August 202629 October 2026
52 measurements spanning 83 days, net -2,854. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,778–21,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Oct 2026, 13:5918,206-35
28 Oct 2026, 13:1518,241-27
27 Oct 2026, 13:4918,268-34
26 Oct 2026, 15:5518,302-30
25 Oct 2026, 13:5118,332-39
24 Oct 2026, 10:5018,371-34
23 Oct 2026, 10:2918,405-38
22 Oct 2026, 13:4818,443-44
21 Oct 2026, 08:1818,487-50
20 Oct 2026, 07:0918,537-42
19 Oct 2026, 09:3618,579-36
18 Oct 2026, 11:3018,615-29
17 Oct 2026, 13:0718,644-25
16 Oct 2026, 15:4018,669-41
15 Oct 2026, 14:0918,710-18
14 Oct 2026, 12:1618,728-15
12 Oct 2026, 23:0618,743-128
8 Oct 2026, 15:4118,871-104
4 Oct 2026, 05:3918,975-251
25 Sept 2026, 09:3919,226first reading

Engagement

144 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 144 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33m 44s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,820 reactions across 135 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,03156.6%
🔥27915.3%
👍22012.1%
🥰1025.60%
👏623.41%
😢432.36%
💯281.54%
😍241.32%
❤‍🔥130.714%
😱80.44%
🤔70.385%
🤝20.11%
🤩10.055%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 144 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,820 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTC503 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Бугун дам олиш куни эди…Лекин биз ишдамиз! Нега? Яқинда катта проектимиз бор ва жамоа рахбари сифатида ўзгаришлар қилаяпман, батафсил видеода… 🎥

❤7👏2

2 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTC501 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤9🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC646 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Дилрабо Исроилова ишда раҳбар, минглаб аёллар кўзида Психолог☝🏻 Лекин жажжи шу икки фарзандларим учун Онаман! ❤️🥰

❤9👏1

2 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC628 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤13🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 06:40 UTC860 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

2-сентябрь, бошландии 😁 Мактабни 1-куни кимда қандай бошландии?

❤10🥰4👍3

1 Sept 2026, 16:59 UTC996 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Вот это даа! Овқатга келинглар! 😍 Ҳа айтганча, биз каатта жамоамиз билан яқинда янгиликлар билан чиқамиз! 🤫 Жуда катта бомбачалар тайёрлаяпмиз, сиз тайёр бўлсангиз бўлди! 🔥

🔥23👍5👏1🥰1

1 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC972 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Дилрабо Исраилова рецепти бўйича бугун таом қиламиз! 🥙

👍10🔥6❤1

1 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC992 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Кўпчилик орзу-мақсадларини январь ойига қўйишади… 🧠 Лекин, бизни миямиз болаликдан нимани кўрган бўлса, шуни ҳис қилади 🍁Сентябрь - Янгиланиш, бошланиш ва трансформация ойидир⚡️

❤22👍3💯2👏1

1 Sept 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,030 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

☕️ Кунимни ўзимга нонушта тайёрлашдан бошладим… Сизда тонг қандай бошланади? 🥰

❤14🔥5👍1

1 Sept 2026, 06:14 UTC≈1,010 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

☀️ Бугун эрта турдим… Шу дақиқани сиз билан улашгим келди 😍☺️

❤19

31 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈1,010 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @ichimdagi_men_idPhoto

Сизларни яхши кураман 🤍

❤18🥰3🔥2

30 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,140 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

👀Хўш қизлаар, тест жавоблари қанчалик тўғри чиқди? Ўз фикрларингизни ёзиб қолдиринг ☺️👇🏻

❤14💯12👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @men_ayolman_vebinar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTCAnonymous Poll71 voters

⁉️ Менинг қайси курсимда қайта ўқишни танлаган бўлардингиз?

  1. 💄 «Аёллик жозибаси»69%
  2. 🎯 «Мендаги Мен»32%
  3. 🧠 «Менторлик»21%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTCAnonymous Poll71 voters

⁉️ Менинг қайси курсимда қайта ўқишни танлаган бўлардингиз?

  1. 💄 «Аёллик жозибаси»69%
  2. 🎯 «Мендаги Мен»32%
  3. 🧠 «Менторлик»21%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Men Ayolman ❤️” (@men_ayolman_vebinar), 18,206 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/men_ayolman_vebinar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.