NEW АКЦИЯ 🔓 Делаю любую 1 работу за рекламу на канале +200 пдп БЕСПЛАТНО Договариваться в ЛС @kesha_088 🔝 : Разделители, видео, аватарку, обложку, любую картинку....

Channel
¡👾 𝗠IS𝗧 𝗘𝗡𝗧𝖤𝖱`ɪɴᴅ & ᴇɴɢ
@memuclab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001932484152 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @memuclab |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/memuclab |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 50 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 50 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 27 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 15s
- Average length
- 34s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377674988784459513 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 20.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2025 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
𝗡ew #PRACTICE ! 👾 <😈> by #ASHARIN --- s0ng: RAILWAY ♬ —— 𝖿𝗋.. ˙ MIST Все компании у тебя до меня — отстой
custom 53776749887844595132👾1
—🔠➖🤩🌟🤩🔇➖ 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🤩ISTORY OF 🔠ROUP 🦷 AAAAA🫵 голова. . ? who is she? (🔠)RROR #teaser #concept #yumixel #best >> @yumixelm
— оnce upon a time . . 🖐 ``park chunghee ♱ 🎵 ``22.05.2012 ``enfj ⭐ ✮ ``all round — who is villain? . . 🤩
—🔠➖🤩🌟🤩🔇➖ 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🤩ISTORY OF 🔠ROUP 🦷 AAAAA🫵 остров.. ? who is she? (🔠)RROR #teaser #concept #yumixel #best >> @yumixelm
—🔠🤩🔇🌟➖🤩 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐😀⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🤩ONCEPT 🤩EASER 🦷HO(😀)RROR or 🖤🖤🖤 soon.. 😀 #teaser #concept #yumixel #best >> @yumixelm
𝗡ew #PRACTICE ! 👾 <😈> by #CHUNGHEE --- s0ng: ZEN ♬ —— 𝖿𝗋.. ˙ MIST Все компании у тебя до меня — отстой
𝗡ew #PRACTICE ! 👾 <😈> by #EVEREST --- s0ng: WOKE UP ♬ —— 𝖿𝗋.. ˙ MIST @mistenter - RUS канал
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩🤩 ➖➖➖➖➖🤩🔇 solo artist, prod. 🔇 rap machine with a little bit of vocal skills. 〽️ pretty b🤩tches never die. creator of best projects: ▫️ 🔇➖@I0U_NV 🔇➖@BL00M_Z 🔇➖@witchesoigroup 🔇➖@BEHA1_NV 🔇➖ 〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️〽️ 🔇 songwriter 🤩 covermaker: 🔇➖ 🔇➖ 🔇➖ ▫️@N0NNV
adalah berlian utama di toko ini 👾 🔮 MIST CENTER — produksi untuk menemukan perspektif baru, pemenuhan keinginan, dan banyak hal lainnya... . . . PS @ MISTCENTER
Sayang, tunggu.. ` HAVIGATSUYA 😈 tentang kami ! administrasi PERATURAN ENTER ARTIS KAMI @mistenter - RUS канал
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @memuclab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@mistenter · 2766 postsПЕРЕЕЗД ᴀsʜᴀʀɪɴ||ᴏɪ
@asharincover · 832 posts𝘊𝘩𝘶𝘯𝘨h͟͟e͟͟e͟͟ | 100% 𝘴𝘦𝘹𝘺 🌹
@chuusolo · 92 posts🇪🇸G0Dbl3ss
@N0NNV · 532 postsᴀɪʏᴀ 🫧
@aiyamist · 641 post♯𝘽𝘓𝘖𝘖𝘔_𝙕
@BL00M_Z · 81 postㅤ< 𝐆 σꪱ > 🤍 B͟͟E͟͟S͟͟T͟͟ 𝖠RTIST
@g_oiartist · 1161 postᝰ QŃN "[🔪] 콴
@quann_oi · 181 postКомнатка Ринн🩵
@RinnsRoom · 1001 post~VIOLLA|OI
@viollaoii · 251 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@memuclab named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“¡👾 𝗠IS𝗧 𝗘𝗡𝗧𝖤𝖱`ɪɴᴅ & ᴇɴɢ” (@memuclab), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/memuclab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.