Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Memhash Report

Channel

Memhash Report

@memhashreport

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

62subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002491029254
TypeChannel
Username@memhashreport
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 2 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/memhashreport

Growth

626362.57 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers15 August 2026 — 62 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:3862-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:3163no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:0463first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 2 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7153.8%
👏2317.4%
1410.6%
🔥129.09%
86.06%
💊32.27%
👌10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2025 to 7 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Mar 2025, 15:59 UTC255 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

We are waiting memhash founder arrest.

👍12👌1🔥1

7 Mar 2025, 05:14 UTC251 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Did you give up already?

  1. Yes59%
  2. No41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Mar 2025, 18:06 UTC315 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

https://www.instagram.com/yungstary?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=ZDNlZDc0MzIxNw== Nick Borisov Inst. Maybe you can take some photos from there.

👍3

6 Mar 2025, 18:05 UTC225 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

The Memhash project has two public faces — the enigmatic creator Hashoti Memokoto and Nikolai Borisov. Nikolai Borisov positions himself as a skilled developer and the project’s CEO. Hashoti, meanwhile, portrays himself as a wealthy older man who’s lived a lavish and privileged life. Fun fact: During an AMA, Nikolai was live on camera while messages from Hashoti’s account were simultaneously being posted in the whal

👍6

2 Mar 2025, 15:05 UTC651 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

INTERPOL (Financial Crimes): https://www.interpol.int/Report-a-Crime Europol (Cybercrime): https://www.europol.europa.eu/report-a-crime Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA): https://www.dfsa.ae/complaints About alcholol parties CEO of Memhash in Dubai https://www.dubaipolice.gov.ae → "Report Cybercrime" UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA): https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/report-scam French AMF (Market Abu

🔥11👍7👏51

2 Mar 2025, 14:45 UTC564 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

So, they deleted posts. Before/After

👍61

2 Mar 2025, 13:22 UTCviews —

Memhash Report pinned «To all. Collect all proof of fraudulent activity: Blockchain Transactions: by your payment to their app, or funds in memhash team wallet. Transaction hashes (TXID). Memhash team wallet addresses (e.g., 0x4a6c...d8f3). Screenshots from public group: Telegram/social…»

2 Mar 2025, 13:21 UTC638 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Demanding Transparency: Stolen Funds and Fake Metrics The team refuses to disclose basic financial details because the money is stolen. Critical Questions is: Total Funds Raised: If they claim "modest fundraising," why not share wallet balances? The public wallet have only 570k, where is the rest? Exchange Listings & Ads: If funds were spent on listings (e.g., MEXC, Bybit), show invoices or blockchain transactions.

👍161👏1

2 Mar 2025, 13:21 UTC549 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Bot-Driven Deception and the "Listing Price" Myth Bots in comments and Telegram groups are aggressively pushing a "listing price" of $0.005 per token, claiming investors will recover losses if they "hold long-term." This is a classic psychological trap: False Hope: The number is arbitrary, with no mathematical basis (e.g., no tokenomics model or burn mechanism supports it). Distraction: While bots spam this narrative

61👍1

2 Mar 2025, 12:35 UTC623 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026

About their our money. "It is a passive and misguided strategy to assume that 'since our money is already in their hands, nothing can be done.' Currently, the public wallet https://tonviewer.com/UQAZ5dJqe0v1T-_WmMSCTGIKjMqWY68CB0DxC2QOnaXuIGsH holds only $570,000. This is impossible, as Pavel Durov’s official post explicitly stated that $500,000 was raised in just one week. The math does not add up — the funds have b

👏13👍41

2 Mar 2025, 12:23 UTC584 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Should we create a post with comments, where victims can communicate with each other?

  1. Yes, it would make it easier to share evidence (e.g., screenshots of Memhash and Telegram scams).97%
  2. No, scammers could use the comments to send phishing links.3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2025, 11:57 UTC690 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026

List of another organisations: Russia - https://мвд.рф/request_main UK - https://www.actionfraud.police.uk France - https://signal.conso.gouv.fr/en (Highly reccomend against Pavel Durov) USA - SEC - https://www.sec.gov/submit-tip-or-complaint/tips-complaints-resources/report-suspected-securities-fraud-or-wrongdoing Against DWF labs and Memhash Dubai - https://www.dubaipolice.gov.ae/ India - https://cybercrime.gov.in/

👍11💊32👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @memhashreport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Mar 2025, 05:14 UTCAnonymous Poll59 voters

Did you give up already?

  1. Yes59%
  2. No41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2025, 12:23 UTCAnonymous Poll65 voters

Should we create a post with comments, where victims can communicate with each other?

  1. Yes, it would make it easier to share evidence (e.g., screenshots of Memhash and Telegram scams).97%
  2. No, scammers could use the comments to send phishing links.3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2025 to 7 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Memhash Report” (@memhashreport), 62 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/memhashreport.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.