Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Melodix Channel

@melodix_crypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

143subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002360624666
TypeChannel
Username@melodix_crypto
Created15 September 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/melodix_crypto

Growth

143144143.57 August 2026 — 144 subscribers8 August 2026 — 144 subscribers14 August 2026 — 143 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 143–144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:14143-1
8 Aug 2026, 21:31144no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:48144first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3832.5%
2420.5%
👍2117.9%
👏119.40%
65.13%
🎉65.13%
🦄43.42%
💯21.71%
😎21.71%
🥰21.71%
🫡10.855%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2024 to 17 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @melodix_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 September 2024 to 17 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jan 2025, 07:00 UTC225 views8 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026

What track do you want to play in Melodix? 🎶 Share your favorite song in the comments, and it might just become part of the game 😎 Let’s create the ultimate playlist together 🕺💃

3👍3🔥2

9 Jan 2025, 05:12 UTC249 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

While we await the test version of Melodix, we invite you to explore our roadmap and Whitepaper, where the key plans and mechanics of the project are detailed. Here’s just a glimpse: In the first quarter (Q1), we’re gearing up for a fresh start with an updated game version, a new engine, customization options, UX/UI improvements, leaderboards, gangs, leagues, and much more 🙌 The Whitepaper provides an in-depth look

4👏2🥰2

20 Dec 2024, 11:05 UTC230 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

What’s New and How Development is Progressing? Hello, community 👋 We’re excited to share updates on Melodix and the changes it has undergone and will undergo in the near future. 🎮 Game Development Over the past months, we’ve explored various tools and solutions to create the perfect game mechanics. After thorough testing, we concluded that the only way to bring our vision to life is to build the game from scratch o

5🔥2🦄2

7 Dec 2024, 10:31 UTC188 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💥 We’re working hard behind the scenes! 💥 Every day, we’re putting in the effort to make Melodix even better. Here’s what will be waiting for you: 1️⃣ Release is near. Testing of the updated app is just around the corner. If everything goes smoothly, you’ll soon enjoy the new version of Melodix 🎶🆕 2️⃣ What’s new? — Completely revamped design. The app is now more stylish and user-friendly — New features and rew

👍5🔥5🎉4

29 Nov 2024, 13:14 UTC209 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Let's listen great pitch again 😉 Link to live

🔥7

28 Nov 2024, 15:01 UTC206 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

It's already started! It's time to come in😎

🔥72👍1

28 Nov 2024, 10:53 UTC224 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

AMA sessions day 🗣 Today, you have two amazing opportunities to connect with our team and learn more about Melodix: 📆TODAY (29.11.2024) ⏰ 6:00 PM (MSK) / 3:00 PM UTC — AMA session on Discord in QUBIC's "qubic-stages" channel 📆FRIDAY (29.11.2024) ⏰ 2:00 PM (MSK) / 1PM UTC — AMA session on Twitter at TON Society's page Join us to ask your questions, share your ideas, and discuss the future of the music industry t

4👍2🫡1

27 Nov 2024, 06:29 UTC223 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

First AMA Session with QUBIC Get Ready For Qubic Ecosystem All-Hands 😎 During the event, we’ll share the latest updates on Melodix, discuss future plans, and answer your questions. You’ll also get insights into other projects connected to the QUBIC ecosystem 🦾 Why QUBIC is a Game-Changer? expand to find out 🧠 🌍 This is open innovation QUBIC is fully open source from day one. Every development, every improvement,

🔥6👍3😎2

22 Nov 2024, 09:39 UTC389 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️Attention, everyone! We have detected that a token claiming to be from Melodix has been launched on the Memepad Blum platform. However, this token is not affiliated with our project and has been issued by third parties. Please be cautious and do not invest in this token. It might be a scam. We are actively working to resolve this issue. If we ever release a token or similar products, we will always make official

👍7

5 Nov 2024, 05:06 UTC899 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Not playing Melodix yet? 🥶 Don’t miss the perfect moment to jump in! 🎶 The alpha test is the best time to start scoring points and becoming one of the first players. While the test is still live, take your chance to secure a top spot! Exciting updates are on the way, from enhancements to leaderboards and competitive leagues. So, don’t wait — dive into Melodix now!

👏98

31 Oct 2024, 09:13 UTC827 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎸 Diary of the Rhythmic Rebel 🎸 Patch v0.1.19 🤪Animations and visual effects New visuals, upgraded animations — your beats are now wrapped in a whole new layer of awesome. Feel the intensity as you hit the rhythm; every note just looks cooler now. 😎Vibe & Vibration Overhaul We've fine-tuned haptics for both Android & iOS, turning each hit into a beat you can feel. The vibe is real, the rhythm is live, and every tap

🔥42

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @melodix_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 617,151 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Melodix Channel” (@melodix_crypto), 143 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/melodix_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.