Вижу то, что не видят другие. Перевожу идеи в визуальный язык.
Здесь ты узнаешь как и о чем думает графический дизайнер.
Для связи: @anastasia_meloch
Портфолио:
https://dprofile.ru/anastasia_meloch
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 761–763 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 15:50
762
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:01
762
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.4%
avg views ÷ 762 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
13 (22 June 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
1,388
Reactions total
252
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,270
Videos
≈56
Links
≈356
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
660 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
217
32.9%
🔥
155
23.5%
😁
79
12.0%
❤🔥
58
8.79%
🤯
22
3.33%
🥰
17
2.58%
😍
16
2.42%
🫡
16
2.42%
👏
15
2.27%
💯
15
2.27%
🤡
15
2.27%
👌
14
2.12%
🤝
13
1.97%
💔
4
0.606%
custom 5353033649010789960
3
0.455%
👍
1
0.152%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 660reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @melo_och. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Задача вышла из-под контроля
На воркшопе Егора Мызника нужно было разработать графический реквизит для «Тайны третьей планеты». Представить, что мультфильм решили переснять как игровой фильм.
Нам задали общий вектор стилистики, локации и сцены, для которых нужен реквизит.
Я выбрала Громозеку.
Но приступив к работе, поняла, что до реквизита ещё далеко.
Потому что прежде чем делать какие-то объекты, нужно понять, к…
Игра в кружок
Знаете такую?
Задача проста: нужно показать знак «окей» ниже линии плеч и заставить посмотреть на него другого человека. Хитростью, неожиданностью и прочими способами.
Посмотрел — попался.
И всё)
Игра без какого-то счета, финала и побед, длительность по времени не ограничена.
Можно было подождать когда все подзабудут и снова кого-то поймать.
Вот вы и попались👌
попался — ставь 👌
Про систему
Недавно я показала вам кейс «Иду лесом» с упором на коммуникационную систему, и мне прилетел вопрос:
Как ты вообще пришла к интеграции компонентов в коммуникационный дизайн?
Логично ответить на него публично, чтобы это нашло применение у большего количества специалистов.
Ответ прост: подсмотрела подход у цифровых продуктов.
В ДС один раз создают правила и компоненты, а потом собирают из них десятки сц…
Дистанционная прогулка по цветам
Устроили с Евой вылазку каждый по своим делам, но с общей задачкой:
Найти определенный цвет на улицах города)
У меня был синий цвет в Москва
У Евы красный в Питере)
Прикольно ощущать запрограммированный мозг под поиск определенного цвета, спокойно идешь и когда уже почти прошел поступает сигнал что это то, что нам нужно)
Начинаешь больше смотреть по сторонам и замечать происходящее…
Одна маленькая жизнь
Гоняла на летнюю школу Таврида.Арт, но уже в роли подмастерья экспертов.
Это когда все вместе и сразу:
так же впитываешь знания у экспертов, учишься, посещаешь лекции, смотришь, как выстраивают работу с участниками лучшие из лучших, и одновременно сам делишься своим опытом с участниками и становишься частью команды. Разгоняешь идеи, подкидываешь референсы и обсуждаешь, как двигаться в рамках за…
Чёткий логотип
Сделала его в августе того года, а сегодня он начинает свою жизнь в медиа)
Знак для Лены — педагога по технике речи и актёрскому мастерству — и её будущего курса по речи для спикеров.
В основе — ощущение собранной, точной речи. Узкие ритмичные буквы словно отбивают каждое слово, а восклицательный знак становится моментом, когда всё получилось. Тем самым уверенным «Да!», которое появляется после хоро…
С чатом GPT у нас сугубо рабочие отношения, ничего личного с ним не обсуждается, но видимо сквозь дизайн просвечивает моя любовь к еде и он это почувствовал…
Меня все меньше интересуют отдельные макеты. Гораздо интереснее придумывать правила игры.
Этот проект окончательно пересобрал мне голову.
Началось все довольно обычно: логотип, цвет, шрифт, несколько графических приемов. Но потом постепенно начали появляться новые задачи. Соцсети, презентации, сервисные материалы, мерч…
Делалька за деталькой и вместо набора макетов выросла целая система.
Здесь я попробовала постр…
Кастомные шахматы
Егор Мызник на своей лекции рассказал про кастомный мотик и сказал:
«Дизайнеру хочется, чтобы его вещи были уникальные»
Это факт. Я всегда выбираю штуки базовые и лаконичные либо стремлюсь их «освоить».
Перекрасить, что-то отрезать или перешить. Даже при покупке смотрю на все через призму как это сделать своим.
А с недавнего времени учусь играть в шахматы, стала нужна физическая доска.
покупать н…
«Мы дадим небольшое тестовое»
Открываешь, а там всё. Вообще всё. Логотип, фирменный стиль, описать правила взаимодействия, собрать кучку постов в разных форматах, мерч и будьте так добры и любезны, еще страницу журнала.
Даем вам 7 дней, как будто я уже устроилась на работу и у меня нет других собесов, тестовых, дел и жизни.
И всё это — за спасибо. Гарантий никаких.
Сами ТЗдаватели обычно не удосуживаются даже нап…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @melo_och. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 125,389 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мелочь” (@melo_och), 762 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/melo_och.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
