Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗠 𝗘 𝗟 𝗜 𝗗 𝗜 𝗢 𝗧

@mel1d1ot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

125subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003700514257
TypeChannel
Username@mel1d1ot
CreatedBetween 1 January 2026 and 14 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mel1d1ot

Growth

12510 Aug 2026, 03:46 — 125 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:31 — 125 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:4610 Aug 2026, 20:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124–126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:31125no change
10 Aug 2026, 03:46125first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
86.4%
avg views ÷ 125 subscribers
Avg views / post
108
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (14 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total324
Reactions total46
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌚7433.0%
👻4419.6%
👀4017.9%
💯2812.5%
custom 5188588649851134239177.59%
custom 5474279119782946136104.46%
custom 545851097198940077952.23%
custom 529214686977275600131.34%
custom 546083029727891433220.893%
custom 518827153523580169210.446%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mel1d1ot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC53 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

в тикток видева новое пасматрите

custom 51885886498511342398custom 54742791197829461363custom 54608302972789143322custom 52921468697727560011

25 Jul 2026, 20:23 UTC139 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

скетчи с щп вам расскажиье как дела как жизнь

👻12custom 54742791197829461365custom 51885886498511342391custom 52921468697727560011

24 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC132 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @podval_fokses_SeniPhoto

Колаба с @MELIDIOT А я пошёл чинить стилус который рипнулся...

custom 51885886498511342396🌚3custom 54585109719894007792👻1custom 54742791197829461361

6 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC257 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

пока отрисовываю долги приглашаю вас с анонку на все вопросы отвечу одним большим постом что бы не скучали 🫯

👻11🌚2custom 51885886498511342391custom 52921468697727560011

1 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC318 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ой кто же это

🌚13💯6custom 54585109719894007792

1 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC277 views11 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026

вы дурные какие звезды вы што

🌚6💯4custom 54742791197829461361

24 Jun 2026, 21:25 UTC379 views28 reactions20 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

вы что ли

🌚20👀4💯2👻1custom 51885886498511342391

22 Jun 2026, 16:17 UTC383 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👀👀

👀10🌚2👻1custom 54585109719894007791

22 Jun 2026, 10:02 UTC334 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

а хотите как нибудь устрою ивент с раздевашкой с фуллом на этот канал а не в платку

🌚9👀2👻1custom 51882715352358016921

19 Jun 2026, 16:17 UTC394 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Vandll_lPhoto

коллаб с @mel1d1ot первый нормальный артик моему маскоту (цвета могут меняться, я есчо не определился) ну, я щас буду мб в вд играть, а завтра дорисую долги

🌚9👻2💯2👀1

18 Jun 2026, 18:33 UTC379 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

не скучайте берите приватку скора туда будет дроп

👀20🌚6👻6💯3

16 Jun 2026, 16:59 UTC595 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

можете предлагать ваще че угодно там арты персы хз приор такой потому что я босс ростикса

👻6👀2💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mel1d1ot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,135,971 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗠 𝗘 𝗟 𝗜 𝗗 𝗜 𝗢 𝗧” (@mel1d1ot), 125 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mel1d1ot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.